WEBVTT

00:00:00.660 --> 00:00:08.609
My husband and I went down to Georgia, didn't we?

00:00:08.609 --> 00:00:09.609
That had to be a better trip.

00:00:09.609 --> 00:00:10.609
Yeah.

00:00:10.609 --> 00:00:11.609
It wouldn't be worth it.

00:00:11.609 --> 00:00:15.609
I have to go grab it. Sorry.

00:00:47.850 --> 00:01:21.900
Good evening. Pastor Anna, could you please give the invocation this evening?

00:01:21.900 --> 00:01:31.819
Good evening. God bless everyone. In Psalm 32a says, I will instruct you and teach you

00:01:31.819 --> 00:01:42.019
in the way which you should go. I will guide you with my eye. We're going to pray. Heavenly

00:01:42.019 --> 00:01:49.459
Father, in the mighty name of Jesus, we exalt and bless your name at this hour. We thank

00:01:49.459 --> 00:01:56.579
Thank you for the opportunity to gather together to make important decisions for this community.

00:01:56.579 --> 00:02:04.459
I pray for everything turns out well and that you will be done. May your wisdom, compassion,

00:02:04.459 --> 00:02:12.740
and mercy be poured out upon us. May your Holy Spirit help us make the best decision

00:02:12.740 --> 00:02:15.219
for the well-being of all.

00:02:15.219 --> 00:02:18.560
In the name of Jesus, we pray, amen.

00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:19.400
Amen.

00:02:19.400 --> 00:02:21.620
And we'll officially call this meeting to order.

00:02:21.620 --> 00:02:23.699
Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll?

00:02:24.939 --> 00:02:26.219
Mayor Miller?

00:02:26.219 --> 00:02:27.520
Here.

00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:28.620
Alderpersons, Klemm?

00:02:28.620 --> 00:02:30.000
Here.

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:30.860
Johnson?

00:02:30.860 --> 00:02:31.979
Here.

00:02:31.979 --> 00:02:34.419
Simmons will be marked absent for now.

00:02:34.419 --> 00:02:35.240
Parker?

00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:36.560
Here.

00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:37.460
Stacy?

00:02:37.460 --> 00:02:38.300
Here.

00:02:38.300 --> 00:02:39.120
Shadle?

00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:39.960
Here.

00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:40.800
Sanders?

00:02:40.800 --> 00:02:41.620
Here.

00:02:41.620 --> 00:02:42.460
And Sellers?

00:02:42.460 --> 00:02:46.259
A motion in order for Alderman Simmons to attend remotely.

00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:48.439
So I'll move.

00:02:48.439 --> 00:02:49.840
Second.

00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:53.080
We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle,

00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:58.110
seconded by Alderman Klemm.

00:02:58.110 --> 00:02:59.430
All those in favor?

00:02:59.430 --> 00:03:03.699
No.

00:03:03.699 --> 00:03:05.840
Okay, Madam Clerk, could you please take the roll?

00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:06.800
Shadle?

00:03:06.800 --> 00:03:07.639
Aye.

00:03:07.639 --> 00:03:08.460
Sanders?

00:03:08.460 --> 00:03:09.300
Aye.

00:03:09.300 --> 00:03:10.139
Sellers?

00:03:10.139 --> 00:03:10.960
Aye.

00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:11.800
Klemm?

00:03:11.800 --> 00:03:12.639
Aye.

00:03:12.639 --> 00:03:13.460
Johnson?

00:03:13.460 --> 00:03:14.300
Aye.

00:03:14.300 --> 00:03:15.120
Parker?

00:03:15.120 --> 00:03:15.960
Aye.

00:03:15.960 --> 00:03:16.800
And Stacy?

00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:17.620
Aye.

00:03:17.620 --> 00:03:22.900
Mays, James, Garrett, Coon, Thomas, Derek, Craig, 6 o' 2 p.m.

00:03:22.900 --> 00:03:23.900
Is she on?

00:03:23.900 --> 00:03:26.699
Good.

00:03:26.699 --> 00:03:27.699
OK.

00:03:27.699 --> 00:03:29.560
And if you could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance led by Alderman Shadle.

00:03:29.560 --> 00:03:34.219
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for

00:03:34.219 --> 00:03:44.020
which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

00:03:44.020 --> 00:03:46.900
Item number one is approval of the agenda.

00:03:46.900 --> 00:03:50.759
However, we will not be having item number 25, which is Executive Session.

00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:52.199
is there a motion to approve?

00:03:52.199 --> 00:03:52.879
So moved.

00:03:52.879 --> 00:03:54.400
Second.

00:03:54.400 --> 00:03:56.199
A motion made by Alderman Shadle,

00:03:56.199 --> 00:03:57.879
seconded by Alderman Sellers.

00:03:57.879 --> 00:03:59.560
Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll?

00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:00.479
Shadle?

00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:01.039
Aye.

00:04:01.039 --> 00:04:01.879
Sanders?

00:04:01.879 --> 00:04:02.319
Aye.

00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:02.840
Sellers?

00:04:02.840 --> 00:04:03.360
Aye.

00:04:03.360 --> 00:04:03.879
Klemm?

00:04:03.879 --> 00:04:04.479
Aye.

00:04:04.479 --> 00:04:05.080
Johnson?

00:04:05.080 --> 00:04:05.639
Aye.

00:04:05.639 --> 00:04:14.210
Simmons?

00:04:14.210 --> 00:04:15.210
Parker?

00:04:15.210 --> 00:04:15.770
Aye.

00:04:15.770 --> 00:04:17.569
Stacy?

00:04:17.569 --> 00:04:22.129
Is it fair to ask why we won't be having a closed session?

00:04:22.129 --> 00:04:23.810
There wasn't anything to discuss.

00:04:23.810 --> 00:04:26.209
OK, aye.

00:04:26.209 --> 00:04:35.209
and Alderperson Simmons. Can you hear me? Yes. And how do you vote on the agenda? They tell

00:04:35.209 --> 00:04:44.449
me what? Do you approve the agenda? Aye. Motion passes eight to zero. Item number two is approval

00:04:44.449 --> 00:04:48.810
of the minutes from the regular meeting on August 18th, 2025. Is there a motion to approve?

00:04:48.810 --> 00:04:55.009
So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Parker. Madam

00:04:55.009 --> 00:05:03.240
Clerk, could you please take the role? Madam, Madam Mayor, may I interject? I did receive

00:05:03.240 --> 00:05:08.279
a message today that people at home are still having difficulty hearing older persons, so

00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:12.920
if you could lean in, is that okay if I ask? Please lean into your microphone, even when

00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:19.519
you vote, they're not hearing you at home. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? Aye. Thank you. Sellers?

00:05:19.519 --> 00:05:32.959
Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. And Stacy? Aye. And the motion passes 8 to 0. Item number three is recognition of service awards. Chief?

00:06:04.689 --> 00:06:07.129
and he's a field training officer.

00:06:07.129 --> 00:06:09.089
Dan currently is assigned to the Detective Bureau

00:06:09.089 --> 00:06:10.850
where he's a general case detective

00:06:11.810 --> 00:06:14.129
and he just got his drone license.

00:06:14.129 --> 00:06:17.370
So he's our first licensed drone pilot.

00:06:17.370 --> 00:06:19.449
So that's pretty awesome.

00:06:19.449 --> 00:06:21.730
Dan has also received our highest award,

00:06:21.730 --> 00:06:24.250
the award of valor on two separate occasions

00:06:24.250 --> 00:06:25.569
and he's also been the recipient

00:06:25.569 --> 00:06:28.050
of many other letters of recognition.

00:06:28.050 --> 00:06:44.180
So I thank you for your service and congratulations.

00:06:44.180 --> 00:06:52.180
Just real quick too, Officer Eric Deemer, he couldn't be with us tonight, but he hits the 20 year milestone, which is a big one.

00:06:52.180 --> 00:06:56.180
He was going to be here, but something happened at the last minute.

00:06:56.180 --> 00:07:02.180
His father was actually a long time police officer for the Freeport Police Department, so he's a legacy officer.

00:07:02.180 --> 00:07:07.180
He also started off as a member of the Auxiliary. He's also a firearms instructor.

00:07:07.180 --> 00:07:15.180
Spent some time working in the state line area narcotics team, which is a drug task force that we're in with the Illinois State Police.

00:07:15.180 --> 00:07:19.180
He's also a member of our emergency response team. He's a field training officer.

00:07:19.180 --> 00:07:25.180
And he as well has received throughout his career many letters of recommendation and recognition.

00:07:25.180 --> 00:07:37.209
So we thank Eric for his 20 years of service.

00:07:37.209 --> 00:07:42.209
Item number four is public comments. Steve Carroll on item number 19.

00:07:42.209 --> 00:07:57.160
okay I'm excuse me I'm Steve Carroll and this is about the public comments on

00:07:57.160 --> 00:08:03.399
non-agenda items at the last council meeting there were many citizens that

00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:08.339
showed up to express their concerns about the outrageous rent increases that

00:08:08.339 --> 00:08:13.079
they were experiencing since that was not on the council agenda they were told

00:08:13.079 --> 00:08:18.000
in a very imperious tone they would have to wait to the end of the meeting to

00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:19.560
to express their views.

00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:23.560
That particular meeting lasted a little over four hours.

00:08:23.560 --> 00:08:25.699
Not very citizen friendly, now is it?

00:08:27.040 --> 00:08:31.759
To compound the outrage, not one elected official

00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:35.279
at that meeting asked for suspension of the rules

00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:38.299
to allow those folks to express their outrage.

00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:44.240
You know, the hypothetical vote on that motion

00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:45.799
would have been very telling,

00:08:45.799 --> 00:08:47.639
and maybe we'll have a repeat of that.

00:08:51.639 --> 00:08:55.320
Okay, by changing the council rules

00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:57.559
to allow public comments on agenda

00:08:57.559 --> 00:08:59.600
and not agenda items at the beginning

00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:02.480
and end of council meetings would ensure

00:09:02.480 --> 00:09:04.840
that what happened at that last council meeting

00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:06.100
wouldn't happen again.

00:09:06.940 --> 00:09:10.220
It's obvious to many that several of you

00:09:10.220 --> 00:09:12.679
are frightened of the First Amendment.

00:09:12.679 --> 00:09:15.940
perhaps some of you should consider stepping down.

00:09:15.940 --> 00:09:19.960
And you in particular, Jodi, step down,

00:09:19.960 --> 00:09:23.440
find something else to do, go back to flipping burgers.

00:09:32.529 --> 00:09:34.289
There's Robert Holtz that signed in,

00:09:34.289 --> 00:09:37.850
but doesn't say whether you are talking on an agenda item.

00:09:37.850 --> 00:09:40.250
Then you'll have to wait till the end.

00:09:40.250 --> 00:09:41.090
Pardon me?

00:09:41.090 --> 00:09:42.850
I have a special thank you.

00:09:42.850 --> 00:09:45.570
Well, according to the attorney,

00:09:45.570 --> 00:09:47.450
he said you have to wait till the end

00:09:47.450 --> 00:09:48.690
because it's not an agenda item.

00:09:48.690 --> 00:09:49.529
Okay.

00:09:49.529 --> 00:09:50.350
Thank you.

00:09:50.350 --> 00:09:54.730
and Rolanda Allen, same for you?

00:09:54.730 --> 00:09:58.509
Are you on an agenda item?

00:09:58.509 --> 00:09:59.350
No?

00:09:59.350 --> 00:10:00.190
Okay.

00:10:00.190 --> 00:10:06.360
No? Okay. Then we will move on to the consent agenda, which is routine in nature, and will

00:10:06.360 --> 00:10:10.320
be voted as one unless there's a member of the council that would like to have something

00:10:10.320 --> 00:10:16.200
removed for further discussion. Seeing none, the consent agenda consists of approving to

00:10:16.200 --> 00:10:20.740
receive and place on file the Board and Commission minutes from the Foreign Fire Insurance Board

00:10:20.740 --> 00:10:25.100
dated June 12th, the Library Board, July 9th,

00:10:25.100 --> 00:10:28.740
Fire and Police Commission, July 22nd, 2025,

00:10:28.740 --> 00:10:32.340
Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report dated August 2025,

00:10:32.340 --> 00:10:35.539
the adoption of resolution 2025-106,

00:10:35.539 --> 00:10:38.200
which is a resolution to request temporary closures

00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:41.779
of streets for the Freeport High School Homecoming Parade,

00:10:41.779 --> 00:10:44.139
approval of the finance bills payable in total

00:10:44.139 --> 00:10:49.139
of $989,343.30 and the approval of payroll

00:10:49.139 --> 00:10:58.580
Roll for Pay Period Ending August 23rd, 2025 in the total of $588,244.78 and also the Finance

00:10:58.580 --> 00:11:04.019
Reports and the Cash and Investment Reports for July 2025. Is there a motion to approve?

00:11:04.019 --> 00:11:05.539
So moved. Second.

00:11:05.539 --> 00:11:10.980
The motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Shadle. Madam Clerk,

00:11:10.980 --> 00:11:12.659
could you please take the roll? Shadle?

00:11:12.659 --> 00:11:13.860
Aye. Sanders?

00:11:15.860 --> 00:11:16.500
I pass.

00:11:16.500 --> 00:11:30.860
Is that an abstain? Yes. Sellers? Aye. Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye.

00:11:30.860 --> 00:11:39.379
And Stacy? No. The motion passes 6-1 with one abstention. Item number 6 is the first

00:11:39.379 --> 00:11:44.379
reading of ordinance 2025-53. Could you please read this? Ordinance authorizing the city

00:11:44.379 --> 00:11:49.620
to enter into a fifth renewal to lease agreement with Pete Albert for 103 through 111 South

00:11:49.620 --> 00:11:50.620
Liberty Avenue.

00:11:50.620 --> 00:11:51.620
Thank you.

00:11:51.620 --> 00:11:52.620
Manager Boyer.

00:11:52.620 --> 00:11:53.620
Thank you, Your Honor.

00:11:53.620 --> 00:11:57.580
The city of Freeport entered into a lease agreement with Pete Albert to lease the first

00:11:57.580 --> 00:12:01.740
floor of the former Raleigh metal clad building on September 2nd, 2020.

00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:06.860
The lease has been extended four times with the associated terms listed here in the memo.

00:12:06.860 --> 00:12:12.899
In 21 it was $1,000, in 22 it was $2,000, same with 23 and 24.

00:12:12.899 --> 00:12:17.940
The fifth renewal extends the lease for one year, commencing September 15th and ending

00:12:17.940 --> 00:12:20.180
September 14th, 2026.

00:12:20.180 --> 00:12:25.899
The annual rent remains 2,000 and is consistent with the previous two rentals renewals.

00:12:25.899 --> 00:12:34.220
That is a new provision we've included this year is potentially the ability to terminate

00:12:34.220 --> 00:12:42.419
the lease early in case of the current tenant expressing interest in purchasing the building

00:12:42.419 --> 00:12:49.340
at the Future. So the city receives approximately $2,000 annually in rent and staff recommends

00:12:49.340 --> 00:12:53.819
moving forward renewing the lease with Pete Elber at the Raleigh Metal Clad Building.

00:12:53.819 --> 00:12:55.860
So moved. Second.

00:12:55.860 --> 00:13:01.500
We have a motion made by Alderman Seller, seconded by Alderman Parker to move this ordinance

00:13:01.500 --> 00:13:10.139
on to the next regular scheduled meeting discussion. Alderman Stacey?

00:13:10.139 --> 00:13:24.750
who's paying the taxes on this building there the city owns it so so the city is

00:13:24.750 --> 00:13:31.289
paying the taxes sorry yes Michelle given um the city originally placed the

00:13:31.289 --> 00:13:35.930
property taxes and then we're reimbursed so we do get the rental fee every year

00:13:35.930 --> 00:13:40.930
and then we get paid for the property taxes but it's that discounted favor

00:13:40.930 --> 00:13:44.210
because it's in the city's name.

00:13:45.769 --> 00:13:49.970
How much is paid for taxes on that building?

00:13:49.970 --> 00:13:53.819
I'll need a few minutes.

00:13:53.819 --> 00:13:54.720
Alderman Sanders.

00:13:57.620 --> 00:13:59.019
Yeah, I understand that

00:14:02.100 --> 00:14:05.799
the considerations, some considerations have been made

00:14:05.799 --> 00:14:10.100
in the event, if anything changes

00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:12.240
within the future of this building,

00:14:12.980 --> 00:14:27.759
and the fact that we have not had opportunity to talk about the discovery of why we should

00:14:27.759 --> 00:14:33.839
lease this, continuously lease this building to a certain individual and we have not done

00:14:33.839 --> 00:14:36.240
and our homework on it.

00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:41.240
We have not had enough time to make that distinction yet

00:14:42.620 --> 00:14:47.180
whether or not this particular occupant should continue

00:14:47.180 --> 00:14:49.460
to utilize that building.

00:14:49.460 --> 00:14:54.460
And I am under the thought that the council

00:14:59.180 --> 00:15:01.579
has not come to a conclusion

00:15:01.579 --> 00:15:05.940
or any kind of a resolution for that building.

00:15:05.940 --> 00:15:08.500
And if we are not doing that,

00:15:08.500 --> 00:15:12.460
we don't know what we're selling the building for

00:15:15.700 --> 00:15:18.819
to even make that kind of a discussion.

00:15:18.819 --> 00:15:21.339
And if we're gonna discuss possibilities

00:15:21.339 --> 00:15:25.660
for future references for the occupant

00:15:25.660 --> 00:15:30.660
that's occupying this building or apartment

00:15:30.660 --> 00:15:35.980
or whatever it is, that we need to look into it, explore a little bit more in depth to

00:15:35.980 --> 00:15:41.899
see if it's conducive to the taxpayers here in the city of Freeport, and we don't want

00:15:41.899 --> 00:15:48.139
anybody to have the impression or the appearance, especially council, having the appearance

00:15:48.139 --> 00:15:57.899
of giving consideration to any individual for whatever, the impropriety of the appearance

00:15:57.899 --> 00:15:58.899
Huffines.

00:15:58.899 --> 00:16:04.660
So, I think the importance of it looks very, very suspicious to me at this point in time,

00:16:04.660 --> 00:16:12.460
and I like to be able to look into it more than just coming to council, looking at it

00:16:12.460 --> 00:16:22.360
on the agenda, and then rendering a vote for it, so I think what should happen is we need

00:16:22.360 --> 00:16:35.740
to do this exploratory observation inspection by council, independent councils so they can

00:16:35.740 --> 00:16:46.100
make it an educated or the right type of a decision making that needs to go into this

00:16:46.100 --> 00:16:52.039
particular option because this thing like I'm looking at it to the same occupant for

00:16:52.039 --> 00:17:02.440
so many years and if that is the case, who's monitoring that property, who's inspecting

00:17:02.440 --> 00:17:08.960
that property to determine whether there's potential value should be increased into that

00:17:08.960 --> 00:17:13.920
property. We're not doing any of those kinds of things and we need to be able to be on

00:17:13.920 --> 00:17:22.000
our job to get that kind of information to make sound decisions when it comes to reevaluating

00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:28.000
that particular property and how and and it's not considered or been brought up

00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:36.599
by any other potential buyers or rental options so that's that's my opinion on

00:17:36.599 --> 00:17:43.680
it I think that's what we should do as a council to to not have the appearance of

00:17:43.680 --> 00:18:16.279
I just wondered what would happen to the building if we do not, it's a three-part question here. What would happen to the building if we do not lease it? Is there other

00:18:16.279 --> 00:18:18.039
others who have expressed interest

00:18:18.039 --> 00:18:20.319
in renting or buying this building.

00:18:20.319 --> 00:18:23.279
And has there been any improvement in this area

00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:26.000
during the last four years during its rental time?

00:18:26.880 --> 00:18:29.360
Let me try to answer all those for you.

00:18:29.360 --> 00:18:31.440
The building, I think it's five floors

00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:33.519
and four floors are unoccupied.

00:18:33.519 --> 00:18:36.119
So if anybody else wanted to rent a floor in it

00:18:36.119 --> 00:18:38.799
that would definitely be an option as far as,

00:18:38.799 --> 00:18:40.679
and what was the second, third one?

00:18:40.679 --> 00:18:43.200
I wondered if anyone else has been interested

00:18:43.200 --> 00:18:45.320
in renting or buying this building.

00:18:45.320 --> 00:18:47.240
have not received any other interest.

00:18:47.240 --> 00:18:53.869
However, we're always open to it.

00:18:53.869 --> 00:18:54.849
Any improvements?

00:18:54.849 --> 00:18:56.329
No improvements that I'm aware of.

00:18:56.329 --> 00:19:00.070
It's storage and as far as I know.

00:19:00.070 --> 00:19:02.809
Okay.

00:19:02.809 --> 00:19:03.889
Over to Stacey.

00:19:03.889 --> 00:19:05.049
Yes.

00:19:05.049 --> 00:19:09.289
Is advertisement out there informing people

00:19:09.289 --> 00:19:11.710
that this building can be purchased?

00:19:11.710 --> 00:19:14.929
And what is this new provision grants?

00:19:16.529 --> 00:19:18.329
If I could just do my best to answer that.

00:19:18.329 --> 00:19:21.889
We generally have not done a lot of advertising for it.

00:19:21.889 --> 00:19:26.009
We have a lot of vacant space throughout the downtown.

00:19:26.009 --> 00:19:28.730
So we could do that at some expense to the city,

00:19:28.730 --> 00:19:31.730
if that was council's desire.

00:19:31.730 --> 00:19:34.889
And also, as far as the purchasing, obviously,

00:19:34.889 --> 00:19:39.289
we would ideally like to not have the city own

00:19:39.289 --> 00:19:41.110
this building eventually.

00:19:41.110 --> 00:19:42.809
So this just provides a provision

00:19:42.809 --> 00:19:47.289
so that if we are able to get an estimate and kind of move

00:19:47.289 --> 00:19:49.650
in agreement to a value.

00:19:49.650 --> 00:19:53.610
We could bring that for counsel to liquidate this building,

00:19:53.610 --> 00:19:55.329
hopefully in the future.

00:19:55.329 --> 00:19:56.769
If, Attorney Zito.

00:19:56.769 --> 00:20:04.299
Zito just to add on to what the city manager indicated so that additional

00:20:04.299 --> 00:20:10.579
provision about purchase it provides the tenant with an option to purchase so if

00:20:10.579 --> 00:20:16.539
that during this one-year term of this lease that the parties happen to reach

00:20:16.539 --> 00:20:19.380
an agreement so we would have to have discussions they would have to come to

00:20:19.380 --> 00:20:23.180
us and say hey I'm interested in buying the property we would have to come as a

00:20:23.180 --> 00:20:27.059
city through through counsel to an agreement on a price and what all the

00:20:27.059 --> 00:20:50.339
I'm not talking about, I'm not just speaking of the current guy that's getting it every

00:20:50.339 --> 00:20:52.099
year for 2000.

00:20:52.099 --> 00:21:00.500
I'm talking about how would anyone in the city be aware and know what is what what are you even asking for the building?

00:21:00.500 --> 00:21:02.500
How do we know if it's not advertised?

00:21:04.180 --> 00:21:09.500
Well, there are five floors total there's one that's occupied so there's four other floors

00:21:09.819 --> 00:21:14.420
So on public record if there are other people that are interested in using it for cold storage

00:21:14.420 --> 00:21:18.539
Please approach the city would be happy to entertain any offers, but it's been empty for a number of years

00:21:19.299 --> 00:21:20.500
except for

00:21:20.500 --> 00:21:22.500
Mr. Albers and

00:21:23.019 --> 00:21:27.380
It is is a cost offset to the city to have someone there

00:21:27.940 --> 00:21:34.900
And GFP is aware of any empty building and would be more than willing to tell someone if they had

00:21:35.460 --> 00:21:39.220
Interest in something specific. So my question

00:21:40.299 --> 00:21:46.019
Is not being answered. How do the citizen of Freeport know that purchasing?

00:21:46.019 --> 00:21:50.099
is purchasing this building is an option

00:21:50.099 --> 00:21:53.420
if information is not put out there.

00:21:53.420 --> 00:21:55.539
I don't care nothing about

00:21:55.539 --> 00:21:58.339
what Greater Freeport Partnership, no.

00:21:58.339 --> 00:22:01.559
I don't care about how many floors.

00:22:01.559 --> 00:22:03.779
My question was,

00:22:05.139 --> 00:22:10.319
how would anybody know

00:22:10.319 --> 00:22:14.759
that this building was up to purchase to be considered

00:22:14.759 --> 00:22:17.319
if it's not advertised, then put out there.

00:22:18.920 --> 00:22:22.039
I would say the same way any other developer does it.

00:22:22.039 --> 00:22:24.860
They go on a property search, they find out who owns it,

00:22:24.860 --> 00:22:26.339
then they call the owner.

00:22:26.339 --> 00:22:28.119
Say, is your building for sale?

00:22:28.119 --> 00:22:29.079
I'd like to buy it.

00:22:30.519 --> 00:22:31.559
That's generally how.

00:22:31.559 --> 00:22:33.480
Do we own over 200 pieces of property?

00:22:33.480 --> 00:22:34.599
Yes.

00:22:34.599 --> 00:22:35.440
Director Duckman.

00:22:35.440 --> 00:22:36.880
I just did wanna say that I know

00:22:36.880 --> 00:22:38.960
the Greater Freeport Partnership does work

00:22:38.960 --> 00:22:42.160
with interested parties that come to the city

00:22:42.160 --> 00:22:44.039
wanting to invest and I know that I've been

00:22:44.039 --> 00:22:47.519
on other parts of the Raleigh building

00:22:47.519 --> 00:22:50.759
and showed it to prospective developers.

00:22:50.759 --> 00:22:54.119
So I know that they're active in shopping the property.

00:22:54.119 --> 00:22:57.000
So when developers come to the city,

00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:00.639
I know the Greater Freeport Partnership does a good job

00:23:00.639 --> 00:23:04.440
utilizing that as a resource when people are interested.

00:23:04.440 --> 00:23:06.400
Director Richter, do you have the answer

00:23:06.400 --> 00:23:08.279
to your first question?

00:23:08.279 --> 00:23:10.619
Yes.

00:23:10.619 --> 00:23:14.700
So the amount that's been reimbursed to the city

00:23:14.700 --> 00:23:19.619
Fort, the tax year of 2024, which was billed in this year,

00:23:19.619 --> 00:23:24.700
was $142.54.

00:23:24.700 --> 00:23:25.360
Thank you.

00:23:25.360 --> 00:23:34.180
So that's all the taxes that he's paying yearly, $142.54?

00:23:34.180 --> 00:23:36.860
Yes, because that's all that the city pays on that property.

00:23:36.860 --> 00:23:40.099
And typically, the city would not pay property taxes at all.

00:23:40.099 --> 00:23:43.240
But our tax assessor charges the city,

00:23:43.240 --> 00:23:45.240
and

00:23:46.240 --> 00:23:48.240
the city of New York.

00:23:49.339 --> 00:23:51.339
So the city of New York is a

00:23:52.460 --> 00:23:54.460
tax assessor and it is taxed as any tax assessor would for if

00:23:55.559 --> 00:23:57.559
the city rents or makes income on a property, then it is taxed.

00:23:59.660 --> 00:24:01.660
But otherwise, property would not be taxed.

00:24:04.420 --> 00:24:06.420
And the reason it's a lower tax amount is it's only renting one

00:24:07.519 --> 00:24:10.829
floor. So they're only assessing taxes on the one floor that the

00:24:10.829 --> 00:24:12.829
city is making income.

00:24:12.829 --> 00:24:13.829
Huffines.

00:24:13.829 --> 00:24:16.829
I want to make it clear to you that this is not an actual

00:24:16.829 --> 00:24:17.829
discussion.

00:24:17.829 --> 00:24:20.829
It is an understanding while I listen to what is being said.

00:24:20.829 --> 00:24:25.829
All of this comes up to a discretionary opinion, not an

00:24:25.829 --> 00:24:32.829
actual terminology or agreement or any of those kinds of

00:24:32.829 --> 00:24:38.829
things that binds the city to any particular occupant of a

00:24:38.829 --> 00:24:42.329
who are part of the city when it comes to taxpayers

00:24:43.230 --> 00:24:45.670
that is owning the property.

00:24:45.670 --> 00:24:50.309
It is a discretion at this point in time

00:24:50.309 --> 00:24:55.309
for anyone that wants to decide

00:24:55.309 --> 00:25:00.309
to occupy any city property and then exploit it

00:25:00.990 --> 00:25:03.309
to get a benefit out of it

00:25:03.309 --> 00:25:04.950
because that's exactly what happens

00:25:04.950 --> 00:25:09.309
when you, whenever you talk about a five story building

00:25:10.430 --> 00:25:14.389
and then let one occupant within that building

00:25:14.389 --> 00:25:16.950
come in and pay a certain amount of dollars,

00:25:16.950 --> 00:25:19.470
who made that discretionary call?

00:25:19.470 --> 00:25:24.470
Who set up those parameters of where and how much

00:25:25.670 --> 00:25:30.670
does an occupant of a building of five story occupy,

00:25:30.869 --> 00:25:32.869
whether or not it's five floors or not,

00:25:32.869 --> 00:25:34.710
whether he rents five floors or not,

00:25:34.710 --> 00:25:38.349
that whole building is being occupied.

00:25:38.349 --> 00:25:43.349
Who is carrying the discretionary guidelines

00:25:44.029 --> 00:25:46.349
or having the opinion,

00:25:46.349 --> 00:25:49.869
because I'm quite sure the council is not involved in that,

00:25:49.869 --> 00:25:51.950
which we should be involved in that

00:25:51.950 --> 00:25:54.910
because we're the ones who should be calling the shots

00:25:54.910 --> 00:25:59.829
about how that building is used

00:25:59.829 --> 00:26:03.670
and how is it benefiting the citizens of Freeport?

00:26:03.670 --> 00:26:08.049
If that building is not being overall utilized

00:26:08.049 --> 00:26:12.589
and marketed for potential rental property

00:26:12.589 --> 00:26:15.910
to anybody else that wants to exploit that property,

00:26:15.910 --> 00:26:18.950
then we're not doing our just due

00:26:18.950 --> 00:26:22.470
about getting this particular building on the market

00:26:22.470 --> 00:26:25.269
so more tenants can be in that building.

00:26:25.269 --> 00:26:27.710
We're not utilizing that service

00:26:27.710 --> 00:26:30.309
of the service of that building at this time.

00:26:30.309 --> 00:26:33.389
So what we need to do is change provisions

00:26:34.389 --> 00:26:37.670
with the structure of how we're gonna utilize this building

00:26:37.670 --> 00:26:42.670
with the taxpayers commenting and have an opinion

00:26:43.150 --> 00:26:48.150
and have their views and an opinion on this property

00:26:48.230 --> 00:26:51.789
that we may not, that if we don't have all the details,

00:26:51.789 --> 00:26:54.029
maybe someone else has the details,

00:26:54.029 --> 00:26:56.509
but we're not exploiting the taxpayers

00:26:56.509 --> 00:27:00.009
to let them know that this building is out there

00:27:00.009 --> 00:27:04.170
and anyone that wants to occupy any portions

00:27:04.170 --> 00:27:07.490
of that building, we have not set up the perimeters

00:27:07.490 --> 00:27:09.809
nor the provisions of that building,

00:27:09.809 --> 00:27:13.569
guidelines or anything to allow anyone else

00:27:13.569 --> 00:27:17.970
to be able to come in and occupy that building.

00:27:17.970 --> 00:27:20.250
So we need to take a reevaluation

00:27:20.250 --> 00:27:22.450
of how we got that thing set up

00:27:22.450 --> 00:27:26.410
because right now in document form, paper form,

00:27:26.410 --> 00:27:30.210
any tangible document agreement or whatever

00:27:30.210 --> 00:27:34.170
with this particular occupant and the building,

00:27:34.170 --> 00:27:37.170
we need to take an assessment over the whole thing

00:27:37.170 --> 00:27:39.889
and make sure that we're following proper guidelines

00:27:39.889 --> 00:27:42.369
that council set.

00:27:43.529 --> 00:27:47.329
What are the, we don't have none of these kinds of things

00:27:47.329 --> 00:27:50.410
that council can refer back to

00:27:50.410 --> 00:27:55.289
and that there's no ordinance at this current time.

00:27:55.289 --> 00:28:10.289
We have not even tried to amend or adopt this particular deal with the any occupants that wants to occupy that building. So my whole thing is, is that we need to re-evaluate.

00:28:10.289 --> 00:28:11.289
Your time has expired.

00:28:11.289 --> 00:28:13.289
Okay, I got you, sister. Okay.

00:28:13.289 --> 00:28:23.289
If there's no further discussion, we'll move this on to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Move on to item number seven, which is the first reading of ordinance 2025-54. Could you please read this?

00:28:23.289 --> 00:28:27.569
Ordinance establishing the Gladewood special service area and accepting

00:28:27.569 --> 00:28:31.809
dedication of roadways and levy of taxes to offset the cost of special services.

00:28:31.809 --> 00:28:36.289
Thank you. Manager Boyer. Thank Your Honor. The city received a petition from a

00:28:36.289 --> 00:28:39.889
majority of the property owners in the Gladewood subdivision requesting the

00:28:39.889 --> 00:28:44.490
creation of a special service area or SSA. Following required notices, the

00:28:44.490 --> 00:28:49.769
public hearing on May 28th, no valid objections were filed. The ordinance

00:28:49.769 --> 00:28:54.970
SSA establish the SSA dedicate subdivision roadways to the city and outlines a framework

00:28:54.970 --> 00:28:57.090
for funding ongoing maintenance.

00:28:57.090 --> 00:29:02.990
The SSA ensures improvements to the subdivision's upper and lower entrances, including roadway

00:29:02.990 --> 00:29:07.210
base and asphalt upgrades, meeting engineering standards.

00:29:07.210 --> 00:29:13.289
The city will also accept the internal road system as is into the public street network.

00:29:13.289 --> 00:29:19.070
Establishing the SSA creates a sustainable mechanism for funding services to be benefited

00:29:19.070 --> 00:29:20.070
Miller.

00:29:20.070 --> 00:29:31.269
The ordinance provides for an annual levy of $400 and brought up to me also that's

00:29:31.269 --> 00:29:33.590
for a term of 15 years.

00:29:33.590 --> 00:29:40.190
So across 16 parcels, the revenues will offset costs of roadway maintenance and improvements

00:29:40.190 --> 00:29:44.829
specific to the Gladewood area, ensuring equitable cost recovery.

00:29:44.829 --> 00:29:49.369
Africa men's approval of this ordinance and establishing the Gladewood special

00:29:49.369 --> 00:29:55.230
service area. Motion to approve. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm.

00:29:55.230 --> 00:29:57.829
Seconded.

00:29:57.829 --> 00:30:01.920
made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers to move this ordinance forward. Discussion?

00:30:01.920 --> 00:30:12.480
Alderman Stacey? Yes. How many homeowners in the Gladewood area has agreed and is okay

00:30:12.480 --> 00:30:23.720
with this $400 and what does that fee involve as far as fixing the streets and snow removal?

00:30:23.720 --> 00:30:28.720
but what does this ordinance give the Gladewood people?

00:30:29.160 --> 00:30:32.420
Well, there's 16 parcels that are involved

00:30:32.420 --> 00:30:37.420
and it benefit from improved access to their area.

00:30:37.460 --> 00:30:39.099
You mentioned snow removal.

00:30:39.099 --> 00:30:41.460
And all 16 agreed?

00:30:41.460 --> 00:30:45.299
No, not all 16, a majority of the 16.

00:30:45.299 --> 00:30:47.960
So I believe there was nine or 10 that agreed.

00:30:48.880 --> 00:30:51.839
With that, the snow removal is currently performed

00:30:51.839 --> 00:30:59.920
Park District, and that is an agreement that predates, I think it was former Mayor Calrap

00:30:59.920 --> 00:31:00.920
signed that agreement.

00:31:00.920 --> 00:31:05.809
Did you want your second one?

00:31:05.809 --> 00:31:06.809
Yes.

00:31:06.809 --> 00:31:07.809
Go ahead.

00:31:07.809 --> 00:31:17.049
Have they had an opportunity, all of them, to have an opportunity at that stand and speak

00:31:17.049 --> 00:31:27.849
on this matter as to why or why not they want to pay that $400. I mean, 9 or 10 out of 16 is still.

00:31:28.650 --> 00:31:34.890
Yeah, well we did provide, we followed the state statute on setting up an SSA and in that

00:31:35.450 --> 00:31:42.089
it required a meeting and each person was able to have a dialogue and ask questions and go back and

00:31:42.089 --> 00:31:48.369
Forth, with the engineers, myself, Attorney Cox, so that process was filed. So as far

00:31:48.369 --> 00:31:53.970
as opportunities to stand here in front of council, obviously it's an agenda item, so

00:31:53.970 --> 00:31:58.490
they could speak now if they wanted to, or they could have spoken at public comments.

00:31:58.490 --> 00:32:06.490
Holderman Clem? What was the mumble, the 30 days what?

00:32:06.490 --> 00:32:12.009
They also had 30 days to file an objection with me and I received none.

00:32:12.009 --> 00:32:13.009
Coleman, Clem.

00:32:13.009 --> 00:32:14.009
Sure.

00:32:14.009 --> 00:32:17.849
I just wanted to say I don't know the exact date, but a hearing was held here in City

00:32:17.849 --> 00:32:24.230
Hall and there was conversation back and forth with many of the homeowners that were here.

00:32:24.230 --> 00:32:29.610
It was laid out as to all the costs and what would be done.

00:32:29.610 --> 00:32:36.889
It was agreed to the biggest areas in need are the entrance and the exit coming into

00:32:36.889 --> 00:32:37.889
it.

00:32:37.889 --> 00:32:41.889
and others will be fixed so that it isn't full of potholes

00:32:41.889 --> 00:32:45.289
and stuff and then we will get it into our process

00:32:45.289 --> 00:32:47.710
to get the whole thing surfaced.

00:32:47.710 --> 00:32:52.710
So all of that was discussed and it was open to everybody.

00:32:55.250 --> 00:32:58.250
Yes, there were some people that objected, sure there were.

00:32:59.329 --> 00:33:03.549
It was one of those things that was never found

00:33:03.549 --> 00:33:08.410
until work came up on the Gladewood Bridge.

00:33:08.410 --> 00:33:11.789
When work was studied on the Gladewood Bridge,

00:33:11.789 --> 00:33:16.509
it came up that this had never been transferred to the city.

00:33:16.509 --> 00:33:19.309
So it's kind of a bad deal,

00:33:19.309 --> 00:33:22.869
and this is one of the best ways to rectify it.

00:33:22.869 --> 00:33:26.509
And everybody in there will have new roads

00:33:26.509 --> 00:33:29.029
and have decent roads to drive on.

00:33:29.029 --> 00:33:33.430
So are you saying that it's now the city's, it's under the city?

00:33:33.430 --> 00:33:46.430
Establishing a special service area is part of it becoming, it's required to set that up so we have some cost recovery in exchange the city takes over the street.

00:33:46.430 --> 00:33:48.430
Oldham and Sanders?

00:33:48.430 --> 00:33:53.430
Yeah, I was going to ask, where are the numbers coming from?

00:33:53.430 --> 00:33:58.430
and who sets up the guidelines for cost effective overall,

00:33:59.950 --> 00:34:04.829
the overall for the city part

00:34:04.829 --> 00:34:07.869
of the maintenance of that area.

00:34:07.869 --> 00:34:10.570
And how do we determine what the numbers are gonna be,

00:34:10.570 --> 00:34:13.710
what it's gonna cost, where the fundings are gonna go

00:34:13.710 --> 00:34:18.710
after receiving any type of provisions,

00:34:18.710 --> 00:34:27.949
of Provisions, I mean any revenue, I'll put it like that, any kind of revenue, where does

00:34:27.949 --> 00:34:33.949
this money end up and how does it benefit the taxpayers of the city and the maintenance

00:34:33.949 --> 00:34:38.550
overall cost and not only that, how do we come up with the $400?

00:34:38.550 --> 00:34:41.309
I'm trying to figure out where these numbers come in from.

00:34:41.309 --> 00:34:47.070
Well, the $400 came from, started with an estimate that was calculated, the attorney

00:34:47.070 --> 00:34:51.449
and myself worked on you know what was reasonable. We also looked at engineering

00:34:51.449 --> 00:34:56.090
estimates for what it would take to take care of the emergent issues on the

00:34:56.090 --> 00:35:00.449
entrance and exit to Gladewood and then also just more of a common-sense

00:35:00.449 --> 00:35:05.809
approach as far as you know what's realistic here, what is realistic. So all

00:35:05.809 --> 00:35:09.809
those doesn't completely recover every dime required to do the immediate

00:35:09.809 --> 00:35:14.170
repairs. This goes a long way of cutting down the city's expenses with dealing

00:35:14.170 --> 00:35:17.010
with the emergent issues on the entrance and exit.

00:35:17.010 --> 00:35:19.769
So what's going to include, what's included right now

00:35:19.769 --> 00:35:22.250
and what we'll be working on for next year

00:35:22.250 --> 00:35:27.250
is base repair and resurfacing of the entrance and exit.

00:35:27.849 --> 00:35:31.429
If I recall right, it was about 200 feet on either side.

00:35:32.610 --> 00:35:34.610
Okay, all what you're saying is a-

00:35:34.610 --> 00:35:35.809
Okay, do you want to use your second?

00:35:35.809 --> 00:35:36.650
Cause he was still-

00:35:36.650 --> 00:35:37.889
Why are you interjecting?

00:35:37.889 --> 00:35:39.970
Because you don't have the floor, he does.

00:35:39.970 --> 00:35:42.130
He shouldn't have the floor if I'm still talking.

00:35:42.130 --> 00:35:43.690
But you weren't, he was talking.

00:35:43.690 --> 00:35:45.529
No, I was talking first.

00:35:45.529 --> 00:35:48.170
Please, Alderman Sanders, he had the floor.

00:35:48.170 --> 00:35:50.449
Manager Boyer, did you have more you wanted to say?

00:35:50.449 --> 00:35:53.849
I believe I've, did I answer your question, Alderman Sanders?

00:35:53.849 --> 00:35:56.050
Now, would you like your second time speaking?

00:35:56.050 --> 00:35:57.929
That's not the protocol.

00:35:57.929 --> 00:35:58.769
It is the protocol.

00:35:58.769 --> 00:36:00.529
No, it's not the protocol.

00:36:00.529 --> 00:36:03.010
That is not how the procedures work.

00:36:03.010 --> 00:36:04.610
You don't get to guide the council.

00:36:04.610 --> 00:36:05.970
Would you like your second time speaking?

00:36:05.970 --> 00:36:07.929
You don't get to guide the council

00:36:07.929 --> 00:36:10.889
when he having a one-on-one conversation

00:36:10.889 --> 00:36:14.510
to determine whether or not we are in a conversation.

00:36:14.510 --> 00:36:17.730
We can't even make that distinction right now because why?

00:36:17.730 --> 00:36:22.730
I have to continue to use my questions at your discretion,

00:36:23.869 --> 00:36:28.869
calling out when can I talk to my administrative body

00:36:29.329 --> 00:36:31.449
when he's sitting right here talking to me.

00:36:31.449 --> 00:36:33.369
You can talk to him every day if you want to,

00:36:33.369 --> 00:36:34.849
but he has the floor. That's not the point.

00:36:34.849 --> 00:36:37.170
That is not the point.

00:36:37.170 --> 00:36:39.210
I am getting fed up with the fact

00:36:39.210 --> 00:36:40.210
and Stacey.

00:36:40.210 --> 00:36:41.210
We have to go by certain protocols.

00:36:41.210 --> 00:36:43.210
I'm getting fed up that you're being disruptive.

00:36:43.210 --> 00:36:45.210
Would you like your second time?

00:36:45.210 --> 00:36:46.809
Otherwise just move away from the microphone.

00:36:46.809 --> 00:36:48.970
My point is this.

00:36:48.970 --> 00:36:52.650
He did not go through the same thing that I went through.

00:36:52.650 --> 00:36:59.210
He just interjected himself in the conversation that I was having a question about.

00:36:59.210 --> 00:37:02.090
So you didn't have that call to make that.

00:37:02.090 --> 00:37:04.730
So Alderman Stacey, would you like your time?

00:37:04.730 --> 00:37:07.849
No, I want to answer the question.

00:37:07.849 --> 00:37:11.529
I want to ask the second question. Would you like to have the floor Alderman Sanders?

00:37:11.529 --> 00:37:17.529
Yes, I would. Okay, that's all you needed. Okay. Well, I don't like to, I don't, okay, my, my, my point

00:37:17.529 --> 00:37:28.900
is this. You're having a meeting, you're having a meeting, um, or had a meeting with the

00:37:28.900 --> 00:37:36.019
Clay, Claywood, um, area, uh, council people, committee or whatever the case is that you

00:37:36.019 --> 00:37:41.019
we went through to establish how you come up with numbers

00:37:42.179 --> 00:37:44.900
and the council don't see those numbers.

00:37:44.900 --> 00:37:47.500
We don't see how you came about those numbers.

00:37:47.500 --> 00:37:49.860
It's not saying that what you're saying

00:37:49.860 --> 00:37:53.260
that it's more like a discretionary thing

00:37:53.260 --> 00:37:56.420
that is based upon your consideration

00:37:56.420 --> 00:37:58.860
and your opinion about the numbers.

00:37:58.860 --> 00:38:00.539
That's what I'm concerned about.

00:38:00.539 --> 00:38:04.940
And my thing is that is not the right approach to do that.

00:38:04.940 --> 00:38:09.940
and council is to be formed before any decisions

00:38:09.940 --> 00:38:11.340
are being made out in the field

00:38:11.340 --> 00:38:14.179
when it comes to redirecting things,

00:38:14.179 --> 00:38:16.380
fundings and all of these kinds of things.

00:38:16.380 --> 00:38:18.820
The city has to be clued in

00:38:18.820 --> 00:38:23.340
so we can make an intelligent decision

00:38:23.340 --> 00:38:26.619
and understand the process of what you're doing.

00:38:26.619 --> 00:38:31.179
We can't come to council understanding what you did

00:38:31.179 --> 00:38:33.840
before we had an opportunity to talk about it

00:38:33.840 --> 00:38:35.519
because it's not in the memo.

00:38:35.519 --> 00:38:39.000
Everything that you talk about is not always in the memo.

00:38:39.000 --> 00:38:43.480
And so what I'm saying is there's a lot of variations

00:38:43.480 --> 00:38:46.119
that are going on that we have not talked about

00:38:46.119 --> 00:38:48.239
when it comes to this particular area.

00:38:48.239 --> 00:38:49.739
Don't get me wrong.

00:38:49.739 --> 00:38:51.960
I just want to know how we got here.

00:38:51.960 --> 00:38:55.139
That's all I'm asking because a lot of things

00:38:55.139 --> 00:38:59.139
that we're doing is not being revealed unto the council

00:38:59.139 --> 00:39:01.960
and the council needs to know beforehand

00:39:01.960 --> 00:39:06.960
so they can make a form and opinion or decision

00:39:07.119 --> 00:39:10.199
about what is going on out in the field.

00:39:10.199 --> 00:39:13.880
I have no problem with it unless I can understand

00:39:13.880 --> 00:39:16.119
the process of how you got here.

00:39:16.119 --> 00:39:18.480
And if that is not how we're doing things,

00:39:18.480 --> 00:39:21.019
then we need to restructure some of those things

00:39:21.019 --> 00:39:26.019
so we can get a clear view on how to go to the next step

00:39:26.920 --> 00:39:29.440
or how we're gonna get to the next step.

00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:32.720
and then not only that, the council is always informed

00:39:32.720 --> 00:39:34.559
of how we got there.

00:39:34.559 --> 00:39:36.199
Am I out of time now?

00:39:36.199 --> 00:39:37.720
No, you still got a minute and 30 seconds.

00:39:37.720 --> 00:39:39.000
No, I don't want it now.

00:39:40.400 --> 00:39:42.079
Is there any, and I'm sorry, Alderman Stacey,

00:39:42.079 --> 00:39:43.279
you already spoke twice.

00:39:44.480 --> 00:39:45.639
Is there any other discussion?

00:39:45.639 --> 00:39:47.480
Otherwise we will move this forward

00:39:47.480 --> 00:39:49.500
to the next city council meeting.

00:39:50.820 --> 00:39:52.199
Item number eight is the first reading

00:39:52.199 --> 00:39:54.139
of ordinance 2025-55.

00:39:54.139 --> 00:39:55.000
Alderman Klemm.

00:39:55.000 --> 00:39:59.599
Second, I don't know if Alderman Stacy really heard what you said or she had a question

00:39:59.599 --> 00:40:00.599
to ask, I believe.

00:40:00.599 --> 00:40:04.480
Yeah, she had already spoke twice, yep.

00:40:04.480 --> 00:40:08.519
Did you have something further than Alderman Klemm?

00:40:08.519 --> 00:40:10.239
Did you have something you wanted to add?

00:40:10.239 --> 00:40:11.239
No?

00:40:11.239 --> 00:40:12.239
Okay.

00:40:12.239 --> 00:40:15.599
Then we'll move on to the first reading of Ordinance 20-25-55.

00:40:15.599 --> 00:40:17.280
Could you please read this?

00:40:17.280 --> 00:40:30.280
Thank you.

00:40:30.280 --> 00:40:31.280
Manager Boyer?

00:40:31.280 --> 00:40:32.280
Thank you, Your Honor.

00:40:32.280 --> 00:40:36.960
If you'll look at the memo, a revised memo, there's a mistake in the one that I put forward

00:40:36.960 --> 00:40:39.460
with the agenda.

00:40:39.460 --> 00:40:45.079
State law generally sets a mandatory requirement, age of 65, for police and firefighters.

00:40:45.079 --> 00:40:50.239
The city's code currently references those requirements for the Chief of Police, that's

00:40:50.239 --> 00:40:58.039
Section 240.04 and Fire Chief, Section 242.05, however, age alone does not determine whether

00:40:58.039 --> 00:41:01.840
an individual is fit to serve as Chief.

00:41:01.840 --> 00:41:06.780
Our current Fire Chief continues to provide exemplary leadership and has earned the trust

00:41:06.780 --> 00:41:08.639
of his department and community.

00:41:08.639 --> 00:41:12.920
It is the city's best interest to allow him to continue to serve as long as he wishes,

00:41:12.920 --> 00:41:16.480
provided he remains capable and effective.

00:41:16.480 --> 00:41:20.199
As a home rule unit, the city of Freeport may establish its own requirements for the

00:41:20.199 --> 00:41:25.719
position of police and fire chief, and the ordinance adds new subsections clarifying

00:41:25.719 --> 00:41:30.840
that the position of chief of police and fire chief will not be subject to a mandatory retirement

00:41:30.840 --> 00:41:32.300
age of 65.

00:41:32.300 --> 00:41:37.800
This change ensures leadership decisions are based on performance and ability and not age.

00:41:37.800 --> 00:41:43.179
From a legal perspective, the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act restricts

00:41:43.179 --> 00:41:46.900
mandatory retirements except in limited cases.

00:41:46.900 --> 00:41:51.539
By removing the age cap for chiefs, the city reduces potential exposure to any kind of

00:41:51.539 --> 00:41:57.760
discrimination issues and aligns with best practices across Illinois municipalities.

00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:03.000
So staff recommend there is no financial impact and staff recommends moving forward with

00:42:03.000 --> 00:42:05.599
and the amendment removing the maximum age

00:42:05.599 --> 00:42:08.639
for police and fire chiefs.

00:42:08.639 --> 00:42:10.079
Is there a motion to move this forward?

00:42:10.079 --> 00:42:10.920
So moved.

00:42:10.920 --> 00:42:11.739
So moved.

00:42:11.739 --> 00:42:13.239
Second.

00:42:13.239 --> 00:42:14.920
Also suspension of the rules.

00:42:14.920 --> 00:42:16.400
Suspension of the rules.

00:42:16.400 --> 00:42:18.440
We have a motion made by Alderman Parker,

00:42:18.440 --> 00:42:20.460
seconded by Alderman Sellers.

00:42:20.460 --> 00:42:22.199
Discussion on this ordinance?

00:42:22.199 --> 00:42:24.320
May a motion to suspend the rules?

00:42:24.320 --> 00:42:25.559
Yes. Second.

00:42:25.559 --> 00:42:26.920
We have a motion to suspend the rules

00:42:26.920 --> 00:42:28.440
made by Alderman Parker.

00:42:28.440 --> 00:42:29.280
I didn't.

00:42:29.280 --> 00:42:32.000
Seconded by Alderman Sellers.

00:42:32.000 --> 00:42:33.679
Suspension of the rules is non-debatable.

00:42:33.679 --> 00:42:34.519
Yeah, I know.

00:42:34.519 --> 00:42:36.239
That's very clever.

00:42:36.239 --> 00:42:37.079
That's very clever of you.

00:42:37.079 --> 00:42:38.239
All of the standards, please.

00:42:38.239 --> 00:42:40.079
Yeah, I saw this coming.

00:42:40.079 --> 00:42:41.840
This is a non-debated issue.

00:42:41.840 --> 00:42:42.800
I understand that.

00:42:42.800 --> 00:42:44.800
Okay, so Madam Clerk, could you please take the roll

00:42:44.800 --> 00:42:45.639
on the suspension only? Yeah, I understand that.

00:42:45.639 --> 00:42:46.480
I saw that coming.

00:42:46.480 --> 00:42:47.320
Shadle?

00:42:47.320 --> 00:42:48.400
I wanted you to know that.

00:42:48.400 --> 00:42:49.679
Sanders?

00:42:49.679 --> 00:42:50.519
No.

00:42:50.519 --> 00:42:51.340
Sellers?

00:42:51.340 --> 00:42:52.179
Aye.

00:42:52.179 --> 00:42:53.019
Klemm?

00:42:53.019 --> 00:42:53.860
Aye.

00:42:53.860 --> 00:42:54.679
Johnson?

00:42:54.679 --> 00:43:01.949
Aye.

00:43:01.949 --> 00:43:02.769
Simmons?

00:43:02.769 --> 00:43:03.610
Oh, I said no, sorry.

00:43:03.610 --> 00:43:04.449
Thank you.

00:43:04.449 --> 00:43:05.269
Parker?

00:43:05.269 --> 00:43:06.110
Aye.

00:43:06.110 --> 00:43:06.949
And Stacy?

00:43:06.949 --> 00:43:07.789
No.

00:43:07.789 --> 00:43:14.230
Motion passes 6 to 2. So now before you is the final passage. Alderman Sanders,

00:43:14.230 --> 00:43:20.230
would you like to have a question on this? Yeah, I just can't understand how

00:43:20.230 --> 00:43:30.510
one of the constituents leaders of their ward cannot come to the to the terms or

00:43:30.510 --> 00:43:37.269
the or the however you want to put it come to a conclusion that we should

00:43:37.269 --> 00:43:56.269
and I have a question for you. I would like to ask you a question about why you want to suspend this particular rule and not have a clear understanding and talk about why the ordinance clearly states this and we want to ignore it.

00:43:56.269 --> 00:44:01.269
to go along with discussions if it's the proper thing to do.

00:44:02.750 --> 00:44:06.590
But here I got someone in here that's talking about

00:44:06.590 --> 00:44:11.590
suspended when the ordinance is talking about the cap age.

00:44:11.590 --> 00:44:13.470
It's talking about establishing that,

00:44:13.470 --> 00:44:15.989
and then not only that, you obviously didn't read

00:44:15.989 --> 00:44:19.470
the fact that there was discretionary and opinions

00:44:19.470 --> 00:44:21.750
going on in this particular agenda,

00:44:21.750 --> 00:44:26.029
on this particular ordinance in its entirety.

00:44:26.029 --> 00:44:31.029
someone is throwing their opinions into this memo

00:44:31.510 --> 00:44:34.989
without council having a chance to even discuss it,

00:44:34.989 --> 00:44:39.989
let alone getting it right in the ordinance perspective.

00:44:41.710 --> 00:44:45.710
We're not doing the just due diligence of the ordinance.

00:44:45.710 --> 00:44:50.029
Now, if there's any amendments that needs to be made,

00:44:50.029 --> 00:44:54.510
then let the rest of the council be able to speak out

00:44:54.510 --> 00:44:59.510
on this particular ordinance, so the people,

00:44:59.909 --> 00:45:02.949
the public can hear what the opinions are,

00:45:02.949 --> 00:45:06.029
why we should do this, because if the ordinance

00:45:06.029 --> 00:45:11.029
gives you a cap, why are we trying to change that cap?

00:45:11.429 --> 00:45:16.429
And we need to know who's bringing that thought

00:45:17.750 --> 00:45:22.389
into the council, I understand the city manager

00:45:22.389 --> 00:45:26.429
is throwing his opinion in there, his discretionary opinion

00:45:26.429 --> 00:45:29.949
and wanting for us to take the consideration

00:45:29.949 --> 00:45:34.130
of what he is saying, that's not how this works.

00:45:34.130 --> 00:45:38.150
There's an ordinance that allows council

00:45:38.150 --> 00:45:42.010
the opportunity to weigh in on this particular memo

00:45:42.010 --> 00:45:46.349
that has been presented to us and the public as well.

00:45:46.349 --> 00:45:51.349
This is not sold based upon one individual's discretionary

00:45:52.389 --> 00:45:53.389
Miller.

00:45:53.389 --> 00:46:07.269
It is all about the council making those discretionary parameters and whether or not we want to consider

00:46:07.269 --> 00:46:11.429
allowing the cap to be raised or the cap to be removed.

00:46:11.429 --> 00:46:13.889
And that's exactly what this is talking about.

00:46:13.889 --> 00:46:19.909
Having the cap to be removed and then we're supposed to not have a committee to make sure

00:46:19.909 --> 00:46:29.909
We can't say we've got a Fire Chief and a Police Chief in the Council or in the Administrator body at 99 years old.

00:46:29.909 --> 00:46:31.909
Where does this stop?

00:46:31.909 --> 00:46:37.909
And nobody sitting here is qualified to make those discretionary calls.

00:46:37.909 --> 00:46:47.909
We can't say we've got a Fire Chief and a Police Chief in the Council or in the Administrator body at 99 years old.

00:46:47.909 --> 00:46:48.909
Fowler.

00:46:48.909 --> 00:46:50.590
We have to make those discretionary calls.

00:46:50.590 --> 00:46:51.590
No one.

00:46:51.590 --> 00:46:57.429
You suspended it, sir, so you don't get an opportunity to voice your opinion on this

00:46:57.429 --> 00:46:58.429
particular matter.

00:46:58.429 --> 00:47:03.789
But my point is, there's no committee set up to make that distinction whether or not

00:47:03.789 --> 00:47:11.429
an individual is going to be effective enough to continue without a cap on it and the ordinance

00:47:11.429 --> 00:47:14.429
set it there so that could happen.

00:47:14.429 --> 00:47:19.429
Now, if we want to change things as a council, that's one thing. We can amend it.

00:47:19.429 --> 00:47:24.429
Thank you Alderman Sanders. Your time has expired. Alderman Stacy, did you have your hand up?

00:47:24.429 --> 00:47:30.429
What is the advantage for suspending the rules?

00:47:30.429 --> 00:47:32.429
Manager Boyer?

00:47:32.429 --> 00:47:37.429
I think it's in deference to our current chief.

00:47:37.429 --> 00:47:39.429
What?

00:47:39.429 --> 00:47:46.190
It's in deference to our current chief so that we make a timely decision and able to move forward and not have this subject come

00:47:46.190 --> 00:47:48.869
back over and over again if the council is

00:47:50.269 --> 00:47:57.309
Accepting of moving forward with this change. And so are you saying not suspending the rules? It's not being fair to no

00:47:57.309 --> 00:48:01.349
I did not say it's not fair. I just simply said in deference to

00:48:01.989 --> 00:48:03.989
our current chief I

00:48:03.989 --> 00:48:07.670
and I would request the suspension of the rules.

00:48:07.670 --> 00:48:09.349
So what are we looking at?

00:48:09.349 --> 00:48:14.250
As far as time-wise, suspending the rules

00:48:14.250 --> 00:48:15.869
are not suspending the rules.

00:48:15.869 --> 00:48:16.909
What are we looking at?

00:48:16.909 --> 00:48:18.989
A week?

00:48:18.989 --> 00:48:22.349
It would be moving to actually suspension of the rules

00:48:22.349 --> 00:48:24.489
is kind of already over with.

00:48:24.489 --> 00:48:26.269
So it's a non-debatable thing.

00:48:26.269 --> 00:48:27.470
You either vote yes or no.

00:48:27.470 --> 00:48:31.190
So to talk about suspension of the rules is kind of pointless.

00:48:31.190 --> 00:48:33.869
Do you want to talk about the ordinance itself

00:48:33.869 --> 00:48:36.429
and if it would have not passed,

00:48:36.429 --> 00:48:38.710
then it would have been pushed back two weeks.

00:48:38.710 --> 00:48:42.230
Okay, so I just wanted to know what was the advantage

00:48:42.230 --> 00:48:43.909
in suspending the rules?

00:48:43.909 --> 00:48:45.570
And you're telling me two weeks.

00:48:47.070 --> 00:48:50.059
That's the time frame.

00:48:50.059 --> 00:48:52.300
Olin and Parker, did you want to add to that?

00:48:52.300 --> 00:48:55.039
Yeah, as long as apparently he was talking to me directly.

00:48:55.039 --> 00:48:57.460
I'm entitled to my opinion, I totally believe it

00:48:57.460 --> 00:48:59.500
and if you read the ordinance that he put out,

00:48:59.500 --> 00:49:04.380
it gives you an option if the person turns 65,

00:49:04.380 --> 00:49:07.539
is not capable of doing the job, he can be removed.

00:49:07.539 --> 00:49:10.699
But when you have somebody as quality as we have,

00:49:10.699 --> 00:49:14.420
it's not an easy thing to change the chief of a position.

00:49:14.420 --> 00:49:16.380
It's easier just to keep who you have there

00:49:16.380 --> 00:49:17.860
if you're doing a good job.

00:49:17.860 --> 00:49:20.099
My opinion is doing a good job.

00:49:20.099 --> 00:49:22.179
So we're both entitled to our opinions, Larry.

00:49:22.179 --> 00:49:23.260
Yeah, that's basically what it is.

00:49:23.260 --> 00:49:25.739
Any other discussion?

00:49:25.739 --> 00:49:29.019
If not, Alderman Johnson.

00:49:29.019 --> 00:49:34.019
Just wanted to say that in the ordinance section 242.32,

00:49:34.380 --> 00:49:39.179
it talks about periodic physical examinations.

00:49:39.179 --> 00:49:42.980
So every member shall take and pass physical examinations

00:49:42.980 --> 00:49:45.960
whenever directed by the Board of Fire

00:49:45.960 --> 00:49:47.019
and Police Commissions.

00:49:47.019 --> 00:49:50.639
So if it's someone that's 65 or older

00:49:50.639 --> 00:49:52.340
and we think there might be some.

00:49:52.340 --> 00:49:54.000
So, if they're older and we think there might be some problems with their physical or mental

00:49:54.000 --> 00:50:01.179
status, maybe not capable of doing the job, then they can order a physical exam to safeguard

00:50:01.179 --> 00:50:09.619
that, you know, that point that they are physically able and mentally able to do the job.

00:50:09.619 --> 00:50:10.619
There's no further discussion?

00:50:10.619 --> 00:50:11.619
Yeah.

00:50:11.619 --> 00:50:12.619
Alderman Sanders.

00:50:12.619 --> 00:50:13.619
Yeah.

00:50:13.619 --> 00:50:14.619
and John.

00:50:14.619 --> 00:50:27.019
I think that adds coupling to that observation whether or not someone needs to be available

00:50:27.019 --> 00:50:32.380
committee or if someone needs to be able to say that a certain individual needs to take

00:50:32.380 --> 00:50:37.739
an agility test to be examined to determine whether or not he's fit to do that job.

00:50:37.739 --> 00:50:45.219
Well, the point is there's no mechanism in place right at this current time to make that

00:50:45.219 --> 00:50:49.300
discretionary observation monitoring system.

00:50:49.300 --> 00:51:00.659
We do not have that to determine whether a person that has been considered beyond retirement.

00:51:00.659 --> 00:51:07.659
When the ordinance says this is the deadline of the retirement, you must follow this.

00:51:07.659 --> 00:51:08.659
Fowler.

00:51:08.659 --> 00:51:15.780
I want to give consideration for someone to continue after the ordinance has already been

00:51:15.780 --> 00:51:17.219
put in place.

00:51:17.219 --> 00:51:24.380
The council has to place an amendment or have one already in place to even call that.

00:51:24.380 --> 00:51:30.739
No one person makes these kinds of declarations or make any kind of opinion about it unless

00:51:30.739 --> 00:51:39.900
We have all been informed about the possibilities of these things happening. I have no problem

00:51:39.900 --> 00:51:48.619
with the consideration of amending if a person has the agility and the ability to work beyond

00:51:48.619 --> 00:51:54.500
the retirement age. I have no problem with that. But my problem is we never talked about

00:51:54.500 --> 00:51:59.500
A cap, even after 65, we have not even got to that point yet.

00:52:00.139 --> 00:52:02.800
And so to have that discussion and have a committee

00:52:02.800 --> 00:52:07.800
to make that kind of determination to inform council

00:52:09.059 --> 00:52:13.460
that this person is sound mind, capable, effective,

00:52:13.460 --> 00:52:17.420
and all of these, there's nothing in place

00:52:17.420 --> 00:52:21.619
that gives us that vision, that gives us that understanding.

00:52:21.619 --> 00:52:24.260
So all of this that we're talking about

00:52:24.260 --> 00:52:29.260
is mute right now because we need to reevaluate

00:52:29.519 --> 00:52:31.239
what we just talked about.

00:52:31.239 --> 00:52:34.280
And that's the essence of all of this.

00:52:34.280 --> 00:52:38.059
So we need to redo all of it,

00:52:38.059 --> 00:52:39.400
including the suspension

00:52:39.400 --> 00:52:41.539
that was thrown out there as well.

00:52:41.539 --> 00:52:42.519
Chief Miller.

00:52:42.519 --> 00:52:43.760
Yes, thank you, your honor.

00:52:43.760 --> 00:52:48.599
So maybe I can help bring this to light or make it clear.

00:52:48.599 --> 00:52:52.079
I actually brought this forward to Manager Boyer.

00:52:52.079 --> 00:52:53.280
I wanted to get in front of this.

00:52:53.280 --> 00:52:56.280
I discovered that there is this

00:52:56.280 --> 00:52:59.320
fire and police commission statute that's out there.

00:52:59.320 --> 00:53:01.820
And obviously looking at the police chief and myself,

00:53:01.820 --> 00:53:05.079
we all know that this is about me and not him.

00:53:06.480 --> 00:53:10.739
So looking at, and attorney Zito correct me

00:53:10.739 --> 00:53:14.239
if I'm misinterpreting, but what this came down to is

00:53:14.239 --> 00:53:18.519
it's a fire and police commission Illinois compiled statutes

00:53:18.519 --> 00:53:21.119
statute that was adopted by the city

00:53:21.119 --> 00:53:23.780
on behalf of the Fire and Police Commission.

00:53:23.780 --> 00:53:28.179
So what this determines is anybody who falls

00:53:28.179 --> 00:53:30.860
under Fire and Police Commission authority,

00:53:30.860 --> 00:53:33.179
meaning you're hired, you're tested,

00:53:33.179 --> 00:53:35.519
you're promoted through Fire and Police Commission,

00:53:35.519 --> 00:53:40.519
this applies to the 65 years of age mandatory retirement.

00:53:42.420 --> 00:53:45.460
What this is talking about before you tonight is

00:53:45.460 --> 00:53:47.219
the police chief and myself are not

00:53:47.219 --> 00:53:48.739
under Fire and Police Commission.

00:53:48.739 --> 00:53:52.260
we're merely appointed by the city manager

00:53:52.260 --> 00:53:54.400
with council approval.

00:53:54.400 --> 00:53:57.739
So that is the determination between rank and file,

00:53:57.739 --> 00:54:01.780
fire and police commission and city manager.

00:54:01.780 --> 00:54:05.340
So what this states is any position

00:54:05.340 --> 00:54:07.340
that is below the chief level

00:54:07.340 --> 00:54:10.400
and meaning that they're tested, they're promoted,

00:54:10.400 --> 00:54:12.300
they come up through the ranks,

00:54:12.300 --> 00:54:16.099
this is governed by the 65 year rule.

00:54:16.099 --> 00:54:19.659
but for police chiefs, fire chiefs,

00:54:19.659 --> 00:54:23.300
we aren't part of that fire and police commission statute

00:54:23.300 --> 00:54:26.539
where the administration, which is appointed position

00:54:26.539 --> 00:54:27.679
with your approval.

00:54:27.679 --> 00:54:29.099
So we're just trying to clear this up

00:54:29.099 --> 00:54:31.480
and make it more understandable,

00:54:31.480 --> 00:54:34.179
bring the ordinance to light,

00:54:34.179 --> 00:54:37.179
have the ability for elected officials to be aware of it

00:54:37.179 --> 00:54:42.179
and then be finished with it above board

00:54:42.179 --> 00:54:46.820
and have transparency and honesty about this.

00:54:46.820 --> 00:54:48.940
I'm sorry, Alderman Sanders, you already had your two.

00:54:48.940 --> 00:54:49.860
Alderman Stacey.

00:54:51.860 --> 00:54:54.860
Thank you, Chief Miller for explaining that.

00:55:00.420 --> 00:55:02.860
And you know it's nothing against you with me

00:55:04.360 --> 00:55:06.300
in any way, shape or form.

00:55:06.300 --> 00:55:10.599
I'm just trying to understand what's at hand,

00:55:10.599 --> 00:55:13.019
but before I can even get an understanding,

00:55:13.019 --> 00:55:16.599
the rules are suspended and I just needed to know

00:55:16.599 --> 00:55:21.039
what the advantage was in suspending the rules

00:55:21.039 --> 00:55:26.039
and that happens quite often and it is disturbing

00:55:29.639 --> 00:55:32.720
because no one could even explain it to me.

00:55:32.720 --> 00:55:35.519
The mayor made more sense to city manager Boyer

00:55:36.840 --> 00:55:38.480
but the way you just broke it down

00:55:38.480 --> 00:55:39.480
Bates.

00:55:39.480 --> 00:55:40.480
Thank you.

00:55:40.480 --> 00:55:53.679
And I have no problem if it's no weeks, one week or two weeks, you're more than qualified

00:55:53.679 --> 00:55:58.559
and capable of carrying on your title.

00:55:58.559 --> 00:56:01.320
Suspension of the rules doesn't stop discussion.

00:56:01.320 --> 00:56:04.079
It just is an order of procedure.

00:56:04.079 --> 00:56:07.880
So if there's no further discussion on this, you already spoke twice, sorry.

00:56:07.880 --> 00:56:37.880
I get a third one? No. You'd have to have council approval. Alderman Klemm. I was I was in this position 16 years ago. That means I'm an old fart. Okay. So if you do some math into it, the times have really changed. Years ago, when these things were set up, it'd be in a mandatory 65. You know, people over 65 years old at that point, were pretty well

00:56:37.880 --> 00:56:39.480
Ready for Retirement.

00:56:39.480 --> 00:56:42.599
You take a look at things today with modern technology

00:56:42.599 --> 00:56:47.440
and medicine, modern medications and everything else.

00:56:47.440 --> 00:56:49.579
People are living a lot longer.

00:56:49.579 --> 00:56:53.059
People are living better for a longer period of time.

00:56:53.059 --> 00:56:57.800
The one thing I think that is a thing to get rid of this

00:56:57.800 --> 00:57:01.039
is the fact of if it comes to a position

00:57:01.039 --> 00:57:02.880
and there's a different city manager

00:57:02.880 --> 00:57:05.760
and there's a different city and a different fire chief,

00:57:05.760 --> 00:57:07.599
somebody can walk up to the fire chief

00:57:07.599 --> 00:57:09.599
and

00:57:10.599 --> 00:57:12.599
Kessler.

00:57:13.920 --> 00:57:15.880
I don't care what the conversation is or what's going

00:57:15.880 --> 00:57:19.679
to happen. When you go to replace one of these people, you're

00:57:19.679 --> 00:57:22.800
instantly talking thousands of dollars for a recruitment fee

00:57:22.800 --> 00:57:29.400
and a number of months to get a person into that position. So I

00:57:29.400 --> 00:57:33.800
believe it helps us to retain a person for a number of years as

00:57:33.800 --> 00:57:37.519
long as they're capable.

00:57:37.519 --> 00:57:38.800
Settler, please take the roll.

00:57:38.800 --> 00:57:39.800
Shadle?

00:57:39.800 --> 00:57:40.800
Aye.

00:57:40.800 --> 00:57:45.739
Sanders?

00:57:45.739 --> 00:57:46.739
Sellers?

00:57:46.739 --> 00:57:47.739
Aye.

00:57:47.739 --> 00:57:48.739
Klemm?

00:57:48.739 --> 00:57:49.739
Aye.

00:57:49.739 --> 00:58:01.329
Johnson?

00:58:01.329 --> 00:58:02.329
Aye.

00:58:02.329 --> 00:58:03.329
Simmons?

00:58:03.329 --> 00:58:04.329
No.

00:58:04.329 --> 00:58:05.329
Parker?

00:58:05.329 --> 00:58:06.329
Aye.

00:58:06.329 --> 00:58:07.329
Stacy?

00:58:07.329 --> 00:58:08.329
Aye.

00:58:08.329 --> 00:58:11.570
And the ordinance passes 7-1.

00:58:11.570 --> 00:58:14.010
Item number 9 is the first reading of Ordinance 2025-56.

00:58:14.010 --> 00:58:16.409
Could you please read this?

00:58:16.409 --> 00:58:21.449
Ordinance amending Chapters 1248 and 1250 of the Zoning Code of the City of Freeport concerning

00:58:21.449 --> 00:58:23.809
and ground-mounted solar arrays.

00:58:23.809 --> 00:58:24.970
Director Duckman.

00:58:24.970 --> 00:58:27.010
Thank you, Madam Mayor.

00:58:27.010 --> 00:58:31.050
Staff had been directed by the City of Freeport Planning

00:58:31.050 --> 00:58:35.210
Commission to move forward with a text amendment

00:58:35.210 --> 00:58:40.809
to change our zoning code for the ground-mounted solar arrays.

00:58:40.809 --> 00:58:43.289
And so a little background here.

00:58:43.289 --> 00:58:48.010
Our planning commission in its last two, it's last,

00:58:48.010 --> 00:58:55.429
We had two ground-mounted solar projects where our Planning Commission voted on in residential

00:58:55.429 --> 00:59:01.389
districts and those two they voted against, voted it down.

00:59:01.389 --> 00:59:07.489
And through much discussion, what was brought up was that our Planning Commission doesn't

00:59:07.489 --> 00:59:14.110
feel that in residential neighborhoods or in our smaller agricultural zoning lots, which

00:59:14.110 --> 00:59:18.550
We have 15 agricultural zoning lots in the city.

00:59:18.550 --> 00:59:20.510
Essentially, our planning commission

00:59:20.510 --> 00:59:24.670
directed staff to change our zoning code, where

00:59:24.670 --> 00:59:26.590
we would, instead of having a special use

00:59:26.590 --> 00:59:29.029
permit for ground-mounted solar arrays

00:59:29.029 --> 00:59:31.550
in residential and agricultural zoning districts,

00:59:31.550 --> 00:59:35.070
where they would outlaw and not allow it at all.

00:59:35.070 --> 00:59:38.590
So staff took this direction.

00:59:38.590 --> 00:59:42.869
And we held a public hearing on August 14.

00:59:42.869 --> 00:59:48.989
and the Planning Commission made a recommendation with these changes by a vote of 5 to 0 with

00:59:48.989 --> 00:59:49.989
zero abstentions.

00:59:49.989 --> 00:59:50.159
to zero with zero abstentions.

00:59:50.159 --> 00:59:53.400
And in line with our planning commission,

00:59:53.400 --> 00:59:56.920
staff is recommending moving this forward.

00:59:56.920 --> 00:59:58.159
Is there such a motion?

00:59:58.159 --> 00:59:59.199
So moved.

00:59:59.199 --> 01:00:00.599
Second.

01:00:00.599 --> 01:00:04.320
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.

01:00:04.320 --> 01:00:07.730
Discussion on this ordinance?

01:00:07.730 --> 01:00:08.489
Alderman Sanders.

01:00:11.409 --> 01:00:21.610
Director Duckman, give me the, you

01:00:21.610 --> 01:00:29.610
We said there was a vote of 500. Is that correct? And who was the five?

01:00:29.610 --> 01:00:33.610
I could get those names for you by the time we have our second reading.

01:00:33.610 --> 01:00:38.610
Okay. And what was the opinion of the public about this?

01:00:38.610 --> 01:00:48.610
There was no major public comment here about this. And I would say that in general when we talk about the special use,

01:00:48.610 --> 01:00:50.610
Huffines, David, John, John, John, John.

01:00:52.210 --> 01:00:54.210
And that's really what we're talking about.

01:00:55.409 --> 01:00:59.349
So, when we're talking about special use permits for solar, I

01:00:59.349 --> 01:01:01.349
would say overwhelmingly the neighbors don't want it.

01:01:02.969 --> 01:01:05.130
Essentially what they're saying at these zoning hearings is I

01:01:05.130 --> 01:01:07.130
live in a residential neighborhood, I don't want to

01:01:08.829 --> 01:01:10.829
wake up looking at solar panels in my back yard.

01:01:11.909 --> 01:01:13.909
» That's what I was listening to.

01:01:13.909 --> 01:01:22.630
Push this agenda that the solar system company wants to try to impose up on the general public

01:01:23.269 --> 01:01:29.909
with this service is basically what we're listening to. I do well the planning commission is saying

01:01:29.909 --> 01:01:36.789
that they don't want based on what they've heard in special use permit hearings that they from the

01:01:36.789 --> 01:01:42.869
community that they don't they no longer want to have it allowed in our residential districts.

01:01:43.909 --> 01:01:47.550
You know some statistics here. You would still be able to do it as a rooftop

01:01:47.550 --> 01:01:51.190
You would still be able to by right put the solar panels on your roof

01:01:51.630 --> 01:01:59.230
What we're talking about is going into your backyard in a residential neighborhood and installing solar panels on the ground

01:01:59.230 --> 01:02:02.190
So instead of having walking out in the backyard and you would see

01:02:02.630 --> 01:02:10.630
You know grass or a shed or garage you would see essentially solar panels. Okay, so that won't impose up on those that are

01:02:10.630 --> 01:02:19.630
Well, this is not a blanket slate for no solar panels for any residents.

01:02:19.630 --> 01:02:21.630
You would still be able to put it on the roof.

01:02:21.630 --> 01:02:22.630
You can't? Okay.

01:02:22.630 --> 01:02:25.630
Any other discussion?

01:02:25.630 --> 01:02:27.630
Parliament, Stacy?

01:02:27.630 --> 01:02:37.630
You know, I've said this before and it concerns me that we're willing to do it for some, but not for all.

01:02:37.630 --> 01:02:42.630
We just agreed to have a church area at this church.

01:02:43.230 --> 01:02:44.789
They wanted it on the ground.

01:02:45.710 --> 01:02:49.190
Last year, there was a couple of homes in their backyard.

01:02:49.190 --> 01:02:50.869
They wanted it on the ground.

01:02:52.449 --> 01:02:57.289
And so now we're wanting to take away the ability

01:02:57.289 --> 01:03:02.289
to have that variance so that it can't be put on the ground.

01:03:02.289 --> 01:03:10.760
Scott, John, Paul, and the others and they have been on the ground. However, we did it for some.

01:03:10.760 --> 01:03:17.360
Is there a question there? Are you asking me? How do you determine why do it for some and not do it for all?

01:03:17.360 --> 01:03:30.960
Again, that's what a special use permit is. So what you currently have is anybody who would like to in a residential neighborhood would like to install solar panels in their backyard.

01:03:30.960 --> 01:03:34.739
They have to go through a hearing with the Zoning Board

01:03:34.739 --> 01:03:36.840
of Appeals, Planning Commission, and then ultimately

01:03:36.840 --> 01:03:38.260
presented to council.

01:03:38.260 --> 01:03:41.559
And that's why currently you are voting

01:03:41.559 --> 01:03:44.239
with your other fellow council members on whether or not

01:03:44.239 --> 01:03:46.159
somebody can have it.

01:03:46.159 --> 01:03:48.559
That's what's happening right now.

01:03:48.559 --> 01:03:55.480
This proposed ordinance says everybody is no.

01:03:55.480 --> 01:03:58.159
There is no longer a council vote on it.

01:03:58.159 --> 01:04:00.699
So when you're talking about same for some

01:04:00.699 --> 01:04:30.699
Huffman, John Huffman, John Huffman,

01:04:30.699 --> 01:04:31.699
Sanders.

01:04:31.699 --> 01:04:34.699
This is exactly what this ordinance is saying, is that our planning commission has reviewed

01:04:34.699 --> 01:04:40.900
and have been through the past two hearings that they've heard.

01:04:40.900 --> 01:04:46.260
They voted against it and they don't see it in line with our zoning and with our land

01:04:46.260 --> 01:04:51.539
use because of the complaints mainly of our public at these hearings and the name.

01:04:51.539 --> 01:04:53.820
Sanders, would you like your second time?

01:04:53.820 --> 01:04:54.820
Yeah.

01:04:54.820 --> 01:04:59.420
So there is an ordinance, is what you're declaring at this point.

01:04:59.420 --> 01:05:00.420
Winslow.

01:05:00.420 --> 01:05:05.860
There is an ordinance involved in the process for people to make an educated decision or

01:05:05.860 --> 01:05:09.300
determine their opinions and things like that.

01:05:09.300 --> 01:05:17.099
The ordinance should be stipulating exactly what the provisions are in that ordinance

01:05:17.099 --> 01:05:19.220
and the guidelines for that ordinance.

01:05:19.220 --> 01:05:24.139
And I'm just wondering, have the people been educated about this ordinance to determine

01:05:24.139 --> 01:05:29.099
whether or not the decisions that they're making and why we have an ordinance that sounds

01:05:29.099 --> 01:05:31.099
Fowler.

01:05:32.199 --> 01:05:35.320
I understand what you're saying. What you're saying is the

01:05:35.320 --> 01:05:39.539
planning board has nullified the whole concept. And so the next

01:05:39.539 --> 01:05:44.139
move is for the solar system is to what? Move out of the city of

01:05:44.139 --> 01:05:48.139
Freeport to move on? Or how does that work?

01:05:48.139 --> 01:05:52.139
≫ No. So essentially what on August 14th we had a public

01:05:52.139 --> 01:05:56.139
hearing that was publicly noticed. And it was decided that

01:06:26.139 --> 01:06:56.139
We can give it to that one. We can give it to this one. We can give it to that one because that's going to if you vote no against this, you are voting to take the control to say they, you know, Sally can have it. Mark can't. That's what's going on right now. If this passes, you're essentially saying Sally and Mark cannot have it. John can't have it. No one can have it in a residential in a residential neighborhood. And the reason for that is the Planning Commission is charged to make recommendations on how land use effects is in line with our

01:06:56.139 --> 01:07:01.300
is a comprehensive plan and they've after the past few zoning hearings they've

01:07:01.300 --> 01:07:06.099
said look we don't think this fits with what we're doing in our community and we

01:07:06.099 --> 01:07:10.260
want to remove it. Right. And that's what they're proposing to council right now.

01:07:10.260 --> 01:07:16.900
Okay. Darren did you want to add to that. I'm on the Planning Commission along with

01:07:16.900 --> 01:07:21.900
many other members and this has been a unanimous decision with everybody on the

01:07:21.900 --> 01:07:25.079
Planning Committee that we are not in favor of ground-mound solar in

01:07:25.079 --> 01:07:26.679
and residential neighborhoods.

01:07:26.679 --> 01:07:29.539
It's distracting, it's obtrusive.

01:07:30.720 --> 01:07:35.119
The current ordinance reads that you can go on the roof,

01:07:35.119 --> 01:07:37.480
you don't even have to come to the council to do the roof.

01:07:37.480 --> 01:07:39.880
That's an automatic given if you wanna do that.

01:07:39.880 --> 01:07:43.720
You only have to come to the council or to the commissions

01:07:43.720 --> 01:07:46.400
if you wanna do ground mount as a variance.

01:07:46.400 --> 01:07:48.720
We've, I believe Wayne said two,

01:07:48.720 --> 01:07:52.000
I think it might be three different developments

01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:54.840
that have been denied by the planning commission,

01:07:54.840 --> 01:07:57.279
but they still have come here and you guys overruled

01:07:57.279 --> 01:07:59.880
the recommendation from the people that you're asking

01:07:59.880 --> 01:08:01.159
to review this stuff.

01:08:01.159 --> 01:08:02.880
It was reviewed in depth.

01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:04.599
And I was not at the last meeting

01:08:04.599 --> 01:08:06.840
but the meeting before that that we discussed it,

01:08:06.840 --> 01:08:09.360
it was discussed for over 30 minutes

01:08:09.360 --> 01:08:12.119
and everyone there was unanimous that they didn't want

01:08:12.119 --> 01:08:16.479
to see ground mounted in residential zoned properties.

01:08:17.840 --> 01:08:20.640
Now, again, there's a difference

01:08:20.640 --> 01:08:22.440
between residential properties

01:08:22.440 --> 01:08:24.000
and these commercial developments.

01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:26.239
It's two different ordinances, right?

01:08:26.239 --> 01:08:30.720
So we're just talking about household properties in town.

01:08:30.720 --> 01:08:32.680
That's all we're discussing at this.

01:08:32.680 --> 01:08:35.880
And we're saying as a group, and I agree with it,

01:08:35.880 --> 01:08:38.479
that we don't want to have that option.

01:08:38.479 --> 01:08:40.399
It's cheaper for the solar companies

01:08:40.399 --> 01:08:42.800
to stick a pole in the ground and put solar panels on it

01:08:42.800 --> 01:08:44.020
than to put it on the roof.

01:08:44.020 --> 01:08:46.119
That's the option they're gonna choose every time

01:08:46.119 --> 01:08:47.680
if they can get it.

01:08:47.680 --> 01:08:49.039
We don't even wanna review those

01:08:49.039 --> 01:08:50.199
at the Planning Commission anymore.

01:08:50.199 --> 01:08:51.920
That's why we're asking for this.

01:08:51.920 --> 01:08:54.920
Alderman Sanders, you've already spoke twice.

01:08:54.920 --> 01:08:55.760
I did.

01:08:55.760 --> 01:08:57.559
Alderman Stacy, would you like your second time?

01:08:57.559 --> 01:08:59.440
I didn't ask you to not speak again.

01:09:01.399 --> 01:09:04.239
I did not ask you to let me speak my second time.

01:09:04.239 --> 01:09:07.100
659 and 704.

01:09:07.100 --> 01:09:08.460
Wow.

01:09:08.460 --> 01:09:13.399
Darren, last year you came to council.

01:09:13.399 --> 01:09:18.100
There was a home that wanted these panels on the ground.

01:09:18.100 --> 01:09:22.020
you talked about how there was no endangerment

01:09:22.020 --> 01:09:24.579
to anything or anybody.

01:09:24.579 --> 01:09:29.579
And twice, at least twice last year,

01:09:30.940 --> 01:09:34.899
we approved and voted for ground panels.

01:09:39.380 --> 01:09:41.380
There was a home.

01:09:41.380 --> 01:09:42.899
No, I'm telling you,

01:09:42.899 --> 01:09:46.960
cause you came to council and you spoke about

01:09:46.960 --> 01:09:48.220
they're not being high.

01:09:48.220 --> 01:09:49.600
Fowl, they're not being harmful and...

01:09:49.600 --> 01:09:55.720
Oh, I believe you're confusing the landfill solar project with residential.

01:09:55.720 --> 01:09:58.720
The residential ones, to my knowledge, have all been turned down.

01:09:58.720 --> 01:10:00.720
Alderman Sellers?

01:10:00.720 --> 01:10:04.720
Wait, Duckman was speaking.

01:10:04.720 --> 01:10:06.600
Go ahead.

01:10:06.600 --> 01:10:08.279
I gave the floor to Alderman Sellers.

01:10:08.279 --> 01:10:09.279
Go ahead.

01:10:09.279 --> 01:10:10.279
Go ahead.

01:10:10.279 --> 01:10:18.399
She's talking about when we okayed the property for Ted Oatendall, but if you saw his land,

01:10:18.399 --> 01:10:21.640
it's totally, it's totally different.

01:10:21.640 --> 01:10:25.140
It's not, it's acres of land.

01:10:25.140 --> 01:10:28.920
So it's not where he has a house next door and a house next door.

01:10:28.920 --> 01:10:29.920
It's acres of land.

01:10:29.920 --> 01:10:33.520
No, Ted was just one of two or three.

01:10:33.520 --> 01:10:40.060
Oh no, I just remember the one, it was Ted Oatendall, and then we did the church.

01:10:40.060 --> 01:10:44.220
but that's out on Pearl City Road.

01:10:44.220 --> 01:10:46.260
And I'm even talking about last year.

01:10:46.260 --> 01:10:48.579
I'm talking about what was done last year.

01:10:48.579 --> 01:10:52.619
Okay, so Director, do you have more you want to add?

01:10:52.619 --> 01:11:00.460
No, I just wanted to say Director Steekle is probably the most outspoken against residential

01:11:00.460 --> 01:11:08.100
solar and I think it goes back to Park Hills Church had a zoning hearing in 2023, might

01:11:38.100 --> 01:11:42.619
who, essentially, he's on the side that thinks it doesn't fit in the community.

01:11:42.619 --> 01:11:49.840
So I just want to say that to be fair and I know that, for a fact, there was one on Lincoln

01:11:49.840 --> 01:11:51.939
Boulevard that wanted to put it in their backyard.

01:11:51.939 --> 01:11:54.779
I know Director Stiegl voted against that.

01:11:54.779 --> 01:11:58.380
I know he voted against the Harmony Church one.

01:11:58.380 --> 01:12:04.500
So he's been consistent to not vote for it and that's just all I wanted, to make that

01:12:04.500 --> 01:12:05.500
point.

01:12:05.500 --> 01:12:17.100
I wanted you to speak because I thought you were going to answer my question and not take up or feel like you needed to support Darren.

01:12:17.100 --> 01:12:22.180
I wasn't being harsh with Darren. I'm just speaking.

01:12:22.180 --> 01:12:25.579
Yeah, if there's a question, I'll answer. I didn't know the question.

01:12:25.579 --> 01:12:28.659
Well, and let's remember this is first reading, so it'll be on in two weeks.

01:12:28.659 --> 01:12:32.800
So if you have more questions, you know, feel free to call,

01:12:32.800 --> 01:12:34.359
come to your weekly meetings,

01:12:35.560 --> 01:12:39.000
make notes so you can ask more questions in the next meeting.

01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:40.199
If there's no further discussion,

01:12:40.199 --> 01:12:41.800
we'll move on to item number 10,

01:12:41.800 --> 01:12:44.600
which is the adoption of resolution 2025-101.

01:12:44.600 --> 01:12:46.079
Could you please read this?

01:12:46.079 --> 01:12:47.720
Resolution approving agreement

01:12:47.720 --> 01:12:50.399
for the purchase of office 365.

01:12:50.399 --> 01:12:56.289
Thank you, Director Suttman.

01:12:56.289 --> 01:12:57.130
Thank you, Mayor.

01:12:57.130 --> 01:13:11.130
This agreement or procurement is to purchase Office 365 productivity suite software for all city staff, including water and sewer and police.

01:13:11.130 --> 01:13:13.130
Which one is that?

01:13:13.130 --> 01:13:15.130
Office 365.

01:13:15.130 --> 01:13:16.130
365?

01:13:16.130 --> 01:13:18.130
Government version.

01:13:18.130 --> 01:13:28.130
I won't read the memo pervatum but generally it is more expensive than we have now. We're what we call an on-prem shop, what we call ourselves.

01:13:28.130 --> 01:13:41.130
We own, the software is run locally, our servers are here, all that stuff. This is going to be a little more expensive, but there are compliance and some security wins and security losses with it.

01:13:41.130 --> 01:13:42.409
with it.

01:13:42.409 --> 01:13:46.689
It's kind of the industry trend is going this way.

01:13:46.689 --> 01:13:48.489
It helps us out with a lot more integrations

01:13:48.489 --> 01:13:50.529
with future softwares we get for the city.

01:13:53.489 --> 01:13:55.289
And that's kind of the meat of it.

01:13:55.289 --> 01:14:00.289
Financially, it's gonna cost just under 21,000 per year,

01:14:01.170 --> 01:14:06.170
which of that, the city, which includes Fire and PD,

01:14:06.770 --> 01:14:08.609
so it's not just city hall staff,

01:14:08.609 --> 01:14:10.890
We'll pay around $17,000.

01:14:10.890 --> 01:14:13.949
Water and sewer will pay around $3,700.

01:14:15.289 --> 01:14:16.210
Any questions?

01:14:16.210 --> 01:14:17.810
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:14:17.810 --> 01:14:18.810
So moved.

01:14:18.810 --> 01:14:21.350
Second.

01:14:21.350 --> 01:14:22.789
Motion made by Alderman Klemm,

01:14:22.789 --> 01:14:24.850
seconded by Alderman Shadle.

01:14:24.850 --> 01:14:27.229
Discussion on the resolution, Alderman Sanders.

01:14:27.229 --> 01:14:30.649
Yeah, what happens when you don't adopt?

01:14:31.590 --> 01:14:34.529
I mean, first and second adoption,

01:14:34.529 --> 01:14:36.829
we have to chime in on the adoption.

01:14:36.829 --> 01:14:39.789
Is it mandatory that we conclude

01:14:39.789 --> 01:14:44.270
with an adoption to accept or do we just accept things

01:14:44.270 --> 01:14:48.470
and just move on just to have it in our discussion?

01:14:48.470 --> 01:14:51.149
I'm just talking off the top of my head

01:14:51.149 --> 01:14:54.229
because you're not gonna mark me down for a question.

01:14:54.229 --> 01:14:56.949
I'm not asking a question yet.

01:14:56.949 --> 01:14:59.909
So while I'm not asking a question,

01:14:59.909 --> 01:15:02.350
my whole thing is this,

01:15:02.350 --> 01:15:06.970
what made the determination for you two,

01:15:06.970 --> 01:15:09.670
you guys to wanna install a new server

01:15:09.670 --> 01:15:14.670
not only that, who are we, what's wrong with the old server?

01:15:15.810 --> 01:15:18.010
We don't know exactly, I'm still going

01:15:18.010 --> 01:15:21.810
because if she stops me, I have to come back again.

01:15:21.810 --> 01:15:26.189
And if we are looking at the possibility

01:15:26.189 --> 01:15:30.890
of upgrading a new server, where does the old server go

01:15:30.890 --> 01:15:34.529
with all that data information on that particular server?

01:15:34.529 --> 01:15:37.989
Because we don't want a Hillary Clinton kind of situation

01:15:37.989 --> 01:15:38.989
and John.

01:15:38.989 --> 01:15:39.989
We have a lot of people that are

01:15:39.989 --> 01:15:40.989
jumping off in the city.

01:15:40.989 --> 01:15:48.310
And so what I'm concerned about, who's safeguarding, I know you've got all kind of security mechanisms

01:15:48.310 --> 01:15:57.430
in place, but who's making those determinations and the discretion of servers, how many servers,

01:15:57.430 --> 01:16:05.750
one or two servers, where does all this resource information, data information is stored?

01:16:05.750 --> 01:16:14.430
because it goes on to a new server that we're considering or do we dismantle the old service

01:16:14.430 --> 01:16:19.430
and who occupies and who covers that and who takes care of that?

01:16:19.430 --> 01:16:25.689
Those are my concern because we don't want to have data running around loose throughout

01:16:25.689 --> 01:16:32.310
the city, you know, where anyone can get their hands on it and use it at their own discretion

01:16:32.310 --> 01:16:34.869
or theft, fraud or whatever the case may be.

01:16:34.869 --> 01:16:42.550
I just like to know how it's being secured, and I just, I know, I know, I know servers go out bad,

01:16:43.510 --> 01:16:53.029
you hear me, I'm stating my comment, my, yeah, and I know they go bad, I know that it's time

01:16:53.029 --> 01:16:58.710
for upgrading with new software and all of these kinds of things to be put in place, but I just

01:16:58.710 --> 01:17:06.710
I just want to know how we're going to go about the data security of those servers that we want to replace.

01:17:06.710 --> 01:17:09.710
Director Shuttman, would you like to answer all those questions?

01:17:09.710 --> 01:17:11.710
Yes, thank you.

01:17:11.710 --> 01:17:14.710
So this is the, next is the server.

01:17:14.710 --> 01:17:17.710
Should I just answer it now?

01:17:17.710 --> 01:17:24.710
So when I do do the server, they'll be running parallel for a short time while the data is copied over.

01:17:24.710 --> 01:17:28.470
and then yes when that old server is decommissioned whether it goes on the

01:17:28.470 --> 01:17:31.109
surplus auction or whatever the drives will be wiped

01:17:31.109 --> 01:17:38.789
and i'm assuming shredded per standard okay alderman stacy

01:17:38.789 --> 01:17:49.289
last year we spent thousands of dollars for a new system

01:17:49.289 --> 01:17:57.050
and now here not you personally but here you come again

01:17:57.050 --> 01:18:05.050
21,000. What did we not get last year that we need this year?

01:18:06.409 --> 01:18:13.210
So last year kind of my big IT purchase was a new physical server box, a host server

01:18:13.210 --> 01:18:17.289
for the police department. They kind of have their own NOC, Network Operation Center.

01:18:18.649 --> 01:18:24.569
This is for Office 365 and we'll get into there's another network operation center for the city.

01:18:24.569 --> 01:18:34.569
So what we bought last year, think of that as the processing and the storage. What this agenda admin is is the software.

01:18:34.569 --> 01:18:38.569
But that was just for the police? Is that what you just said? That was just for the police?

01:18:38.569 --> 01:18:42.569
Last year that service was only for police. To handle what they need.

01:18:42.569 --> 01:18:44.569
Any other discussion?

01:18:44.569 --> 01:18:45.569
Yeah.

01:18:45.569 --> 01:18:47.569
Your second time? Go ahead, Dolderman Sanders.

01:18:47.569 --> 01:18:48.569
Second time?

01:18:48.569 --> 01:18:49.569
Yes.

01:18:49.569 --> 01:18:52.569
Okay. I'm going to make sure you stick to that.

01:18:52.569 --> 01:18:53.569
Your time's clicking.

01:18:53.569 --> 01:19:23.569
Okay. So what we're looking, what kind of server are we looking for this time around? Are we talking about just for the city itself? Administrator bodies or other branches within the city? Or how are we covering all of this? Because I'm looking at a $27,000 cost here. And I'm like, okay, what are we getting? What kind of breakdown are we getting for each department? Who

01:19:23.569 --> 01:19:27.090
who's all being served with these whole servers.

01:19:30.569 --> 01:19:33.010
Without going into the entire like network topology

01:19:34.050 --> 01:19:36.409
for reasons, security reasons.

01:19:37.289 --> 01:19:42.010
This will serve, yes, administrative, city hall,

01:19:42.010 --> 01:19:45.010
basically all staff other than the police,

01:19:45.010 --> 01:19:46.409
they're on a different domain.

01:19:46.409 --> 01:19:48.319
So we keep the actual hardware separate too.

01:19:48.319 --> 01:19:57.359
But it runs application servers, your basic network controls as well as some storage.

01:19:57.359 --> 01:19:58.439
Any other discussion?

01:19:58.439 --> 01:20:01.960
Like the water department and all that?

01:20:01.960 --> 01:20:03.840
Nothing goes to the cloud, right?

01:20:03.840 --> 01:20:06.840
We're not, thank you.

01:20:06.840 --> 01:20:08.600
I was hoping you said no.

01:20:08.600 --> 01:20:17.800
and the different departments like with Daring, Waterworks Department, all that is connected

01:20:17.800 --> 01:20:18.800
with this?

01:20:18.800 --> 01:20:21.909
Yes.

01:20:21.909 --> 01:20:22.909
Anyone else?

01:20:22.909 --> 01:20:27.720
Seeing none, Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll?

01:20:27.720 --> 01:20:28.720
Shadle?

01:20:28.720 --> 01:20:29.720
Aye.

01:20:29.720 --> 01:20:30.720
Sanders?

01:20:30.720 --> 01:20:31.720
Aye.

01:20:31.720 --> 01:20:32.720
Sellers?

01:20:32.720 --> 01:20:33.720
Aye.

01:20:33.720 --> 01:20:34.720
Klemm?

01:20:34.720 --> 01:20:35.720
Aye.

01:20:35.720 --> 01:20:36.720
Johnson?

01:20:36.720 --> 01:20:37.720
Aye.

01:20:37.720 --> 01:20:38.720
Simmons?

01:20:38.720 --> 01:20:39.720
Aye.

01:20:39.720 --> 01:20:40.720
Parker?

01:20:40.720 --> 01:20:41.720
Aye.

01:20:41.720 --> 01:20:48.779
Item number 11 is the adoption of resolution 2025 102. Could you please

01:20:48.779 --> 01:20:52.600
read this? Resolution approving the purchase of a host server for the city

01:20:52.600 --> 01:20:59.300
from CDW-G. Thank you, Director Shuttman. Thank you. So this is for the new host

01:20:59.300 --> 01:21:04.819
server for the city. We covered a lot of it in the questions from the last one,

01:21:04.819 --> 01:21:10.380
but this is just to refresh the server that was bought in 2017. The reason for

01:21:10.380 --> 01:21:14.420
We're replacing it as the hardware is getting older, the incidents of data failure go up

01:21:14.420 --> 01:21:21.060
and up every year. Knock on wood, we haven't had any with the servers treated us very well.

01:21:21.060 --> 01:21:26.640
But as any machine you have in your life, it'll wear down over time and start to break.

01:21:26.640 --> 01:21:32.180
With computer systems, you also have to worry about things like firmware support. And so

01:21:32.180 --> 01:21:37.060
the security becomes, there's more vulnerabilities over time. That would be the reason for why

01:21:37.060 --> 01:21:40.140
we want to do this now.

01:21:40.140 --> 01:22:10.140
Oh, wait a minute. We need a motion to adopt. So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm. Discussion. Alderman Sanders. Yeah, what kind of servers are they? Are they Mac or PC? Android? No, not Android. I know you won't do an Android. But what kind of operating systems are we looking at when we're talking about host servers? Where we're working?

01:22:10.140 --> 01:22:19.619
and Stacey. What operating systems are we using? I never heard of a department area

01:22:19.619 --> 01:22:26.579
using Mac servers or whatever or anything like that. What kind of we're indulging in?

01:22:26.579 --> 01:22:33.020
Yeah, what was Spectrum was a Dell server. It'll be a Windows environment. Pretty standard

01:22:33.020 --> 01:22:36.939
basic small business type stuff, but with the government compliance.

01:22:36.939 --> 01:22:37.939
Okay.

01:22:37.939 --> 01:22:50.739
and Stacey. Okay, so not counting the 21,000 you just asked for, now you're asking for

01:22:50.739 --> 01:22:59.850
another 27,000. Did you budget any of this? Yes, these are all budgeted. Just to clarify,

01:22:59.850 --> 01:23:04.250
the last one we just passed, that was for Office 365. It's like when you're at work

01:23:04.250 --> 01:23:08.970
and you go on your email or a spreadsheet, that's what the last one was. This one's

01:23:08.970 --> 01:23:38.470
Shadle, Sanders, Sellers, Clem, Johnson, Simmons, Parker, Stacy, The resolution is adopted 7-1.

01:23:38.470 --> 01:23:42.869
Item number 12 is the adoption of resolution 2025-104.

01:23:42.869 --> 01:23:44.130
would you please read this?

01:23:44.130 --> 01:23:47.090
Resolution authorizing emergency water main repairs

01:23:47.090 --> 01:23:49.449
by Fisher Excavating on Warren Avenue.

01:23:49.449 --> 01:23:50.890
Thank you, Manager Boyer.

01:23:50.890 --> 01:23:52.090
Thank you, Your Honor.

01:23:52.090 --> 01:23:56.289
Recently, we've had multiple failures on Warren Avenue,

01:23:56.289 --> 01:23:59.729
approximately eight breaks in the last several months.

01:23:59.729 --> 01:24:04.729
This is a six inch cast iron pipe that was installed in 1931

01:24:04.729 --> 01:24:09.510
and it's a known issue in terms of its vintage age.

01:24:09.510 --> 01:24:12.810
Staff has been investigating this particular area

01:24:12.810 --> 01:24:15.449
and is requesting emergency water main replacement

01:24:15.449 --> 01:24:17.890
on Warren, approximately 800 feet.

01:24:18.890 --> 01:24:20.329
That would also ensure, you know,

01:24:20.329 --> 01:24:22.890
replacement of water main gate valves, fire hydrants

01:24:22.890 --> 01:24:25.569
and water service connections to the right of way.

01:24:26.569 --> 01:24:29.689
The replacement cost is estimated between 230,000

01:24:29.689 --> 01:24:32.689
and 250,000 based on unit price bid

01:24:32.689 --> 01:24:36.850
and staff requests moving forward with Fisher excavating

01:24:36.850 --> 01:24:41.850
to replace the aging water main on Warren.

01:24:41.850 --> 01:24:43.850
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:24:43.850 --> 01:24:44.850
So moved.

01:24:44.850 --> 01:24:45.850
Second.

01:24:45.850 --> 01:24:50.090
A motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers.

01:24:50.090 --> 01:24:56.289
Alderman Sanders, did you have your hand up?

01:24:56.289 --> 01:25:12.609
You engineered this project, and we have not done a scheduling replacement of the water

01:25:12.609 --> 01:25:20.390
Mayne on Warren. I recall that in that area, they did have a lot of deficiencies in those

01:25:20.390 --> 01:25:27.329
water mains down through there. And I'm wondering, did you cover all aspects of that area for

01:25:27.329 --> 01:25:35.890
replacement? And whether or not the material that we're going to use to replace it, it's

01:25:35.890 --> 01:25:42.890
that's not going to be the old past material that's existing there now.

01:25:42.890 --> 01:25:50.609
So we should be making all new connections through that area so we don't have to have

01:25:50.609 --> 01:25:59.250
these kind of failures if we're spending $250,000 or whatever the amount comes out to.

01:25:59.250 --> 01:26:09.569
My thing is we have looked at all of the area of the last time anything was installed in

01:26:09.569 --> 01:26:15.850
the past to see if it needs to be brought up to date because the new lines and everything

01:26:15.850 --> 01:26:24.329
can affect old existing lines, just like you're putting new wine in an old bottle and it doesn't

01:26:24.329 --> 01:26:25.329
and so on.

01:26:25.329 --> 01:26:32.130
And so I'm just wondering, are we looking at that aspect of it and moving forward?

01:26:32.130 --> 01:26:37.090
And I would like to move forward with that because I don't want to see nobody out at

01:26:37.090 --> 01:26:43.409
four in the morning with water main breaks at temperatures 20 below zero and all of these

01:26:43.409 --> 01:26:48.449
kinds of things because that can possibly happen if we don't move forward with it.

01:26:48.449 --> 01:26:54.689
So yeah, I just wanted to hear what you had to say in regards to that whole general thing.

01:26:54.689 --> 01:26:57.609
Just making sure you finished all your thoughts so that way there isn't a back and forth.

01:26:57.609 --> 01:26:58.609
Yes, I did.

01:26:58.609 --> 01:26:59.609
You good?

01:26:59.609 --> 01:27:00.609
All right.

01:27:00.609 --> 01:27:01.609
I'm good.

01:27:01.609 --> 01:27:02.609
Darren, do you want to answer those?

01:27:02.609 --> 01:27:03.609
So, sure.

01:27:03.609 --> 01:27:06.050
The replacement this year will only be 800 feet, so it's from Galena to Cable, which

01:27:06.050 --> 01:27:07.850
is shown on the map.

01:27:07.850 --> 01:27:11.689
That's all we have money for this year, so we can't afford to do the rest of it.

01:27:11.689 --> 01:27:13.649
We'll have to program the rest in.

01:27:13.649 --> 01:27:17.369
The section that we're replacing has had the vast majority of breaks.

01:27:17.369 --> 01:27:18.369
Fowler.

01:27:18.369 --> 01:27:19.369
That's why we're doing that 800 feet.

01:27:19.369 --> 01:27:25.010
It also affects a couple of businesses there on the corner of Galena with the grooming

01:27:25.010 --> 01:27:28.609
store and the barbershop that are frequently without water.

01:27:28.609 --> 01:27:32.289
We have had eight breaks on this in the last recent months.

01:27:32.289 --> 01:27:37.930
We made some pressure changes to try to slow some of the breaks down.

01:27:37.930 --> 01:27:42.250
But on the last break that we had, we actually took out about a 20 foot section of pipe and

01:27:42.250 --> 01:27:45.529
it's some of the worst main that I've seen in a very long time.

01:27:45.529 --> 01:27:51.569
I'm recommending replacement now. We have very good prices from Fishers. They're working

01:27:51.569 --> 01:27:55.689
on Harvey right now, and if we approve this tonight, when they're done at Harvey, they

01:27:55.689 --> 01:27:57.210
will go to Warren.

01:27:57.210 --> 01:28:04.329
You didn't tell me what kind of material that was going to be installed.

01:28:04.329 --> 01:28:10.369
This is 1931 cast iron, and we're going to go out and see if we can find some from 1910

01:28:10.369 --> 01:28:13.829
and put that in. Just make sure.

01:28:13.829 --> 01:28:17.789
What about the, do we have, is there, is there more efficient-

01:28:17.789 --> 01:28:18.789
Alderman Sanders is plastic.

01:28:18.789 --> 01:28:19.789
Yeah.

01:28:19.789 --> 01:28:20.789
Oh, okay.

01:28:20.789 --> 01:28:21.789
I'm kidding.

01:28:21.789 --> 01:28:22.789
We're putting-

01:28:22.789 --> 01:28:23.789
Okay.

01:28:23.789 --> 01:28:24.789
Our city standard is C909 PVC-

01:28:24.789 --> 01:28:25.789
Thank you.

01:28:25.789 --> 01:28:26.789
Pressurated-

01:28:26.789 --> 01:28:27.789
Thank you.

01:28:27.789 --> 01:28:28.789
That's what I was waiting for.

01:28:28.789 --> 01:28:29.789
Okay.

01:28:29.789 --> 01:28:30.789
Is there any other discussion?

01:28:30.789 --> 01:28:31.789
Alderman Stacey.

01:28:31.789 --> 01:28:42.590
What is going to be affected from this in our street department that's already been established

01:28:42.590 --> 01:28:43.590
for this year?

01:28:43.590 --> 01:28:50.430
So, as it's notated in the financials, it won't affect anything that we're doing.

01:28:50.430 --> 01:28:55.010
We're suggesting taking this out of reserve funds to get this done because it's been such

01:28:55.010 --> 01:29:00.869
a problem and we've spent so much money repairing it already this season that we just don't feel

01:29:00.869 --> 01:29:03.029
like it's practical.

01:29:03.029 --> 01:29:10.229
If you estimated a cost of a water main break at roughly $10,000 a piece, that's the national

01:29:10.229 --> 01:29:14.909
average we've already spent about $80,000 repairing it already just this

01:29:14.909 --> 01:29:20.430
summer so I'm trying to get the bleeding to stop in this area it is it's I will

01:29:20.430 --> 01:29:25.529
tell you that entire area from Warren and Hunt and all those streets have very

01:29:25.529 --> 01:29:29.590
similar product it's odd that we're having this much issue in this one

01:29:29.590 --> 01:29:34.690
location but it has been significant and the last time we were digging it up

01:29:34.690 --> 01:29:38.630
before we even got the street patched so it needs to be done

01:29:38.630 --> 01:29:43.750
Alderman Johnson. He answered my question. I was wondering how much one repair costs.

01:29:43.750 --> 01:29:47.119
How much one repair costs when they have a water main break and you set around $10,000 a piece

01:29:47.119 --> 01:29:51.220
So that's a lot of money spent in one week already repairing. So thank you

01:29:52.359 --> 01:29:54.359
Sorry Alderman Sanders. You already spoke twice

01:29:54.960 --> 01:29:56.960
anything else

01:29:56.960 --> 01:29:58.960
Madam clerk, please take the role

01:29:59.079 --> 01:30:06.079
Shadle. Aye. Sanders. Aye. Sellers. Aye. Klemm. Aye. Johnson. Aye. Simmons. Aye.

01:30:06.079 --> 01:30:17.260
Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. The resolution is adopted 8-0. Number 13, adoption of resolution

01:30:17.260 --> 01:30:23.260
2025-105. Could you please read this? Resolution approving purchase of 24-foot equipment trailer

01:30:23.260 --> 01:30:27.739
from Knight Equipment for water and sewer construction equipment. Manager Boyer. Thank

01:30:27.739 --> 01:30:31.979
your honor. City crews use equipment, trucks, and trailers to move equipment around to different

01:30:31.979 --> 01:30:39.220
Projects. We have a utility trailer that was purchased in 1988. It's had multiple

01:30:39.220 --> 01:30:44.180
repairs of the frame and it recently failed. Staff is requesting move forward

01:30:44.180 --> 01:30:51.380
with the purchase of a new 18,000 pound equipment trailer. The amount of the from

01:30:51.380 --> 01:30:57.979
night equipment is $13,995 for a 24-foot trailer and staff requests to the

01:30:57.979 --> 01:31:05.539
Council. Move forward with this. Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman

01:31:05.539 --> 01:31:13.300
Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers. Discussion? Alderman Sanders? Oh yeah, we

01:31:13.300 --> 01:31:20.619
did, you did go off of bids. Am I correct on that one? We received three

01:31:20.619 --> 01:31:25.619
prizes and this was by far the cheapest. We're also going with a 2023 model to

01:31:25.619 --> 01:31:41.220
and what's the cost in the memo $13,995 okay 18,000 pounds a street can't even

01:31:41.220 --> 01:31:48.779
handle that well I would hope it could but yes this is for hauling the skid steer

01:31:48.779 --> 01:31:55.100
around which weighs about 12,000 pounds mm-hmm our streets are rated for 60 to

01:31:55.100 --> 01:31:56.100
McEvoy.

01:31:56.100 --> 01:31:57.100
60 to 80.

01:31:57.100 --> 01:31:58.100
Depending on what street you're on.

01:31:58.100 --> 01:32:01.100
And this is in the budget?

01:32:01.100 --> 01:32:03.880
Yes.

01:32:03.880 --> 01:32:04.880
Any other discussion?

01:32:04.880 --> 01:32:05.880
Madam Clerk, please.

01:32:05.880 --> 01:32:06.880
Oh, Alderman.

01:32:06.880 --> 01:32:11.720
How long does a trailer like this last?

01:32:11.720 --> 01:32:12.720
Quite a long time.

01:32:12.720 --> 01:32:16.520
The last one was from 1988, so I think we've got every nickel out of it.

01:32:16.520 --> 01:32:21.000
We probably could, but it's unusable at this part of it's scrap.

01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:22.840
Right now, the crews are requesting this.

01:32:22.840 --> 01:32:26.279
for sharing a trailer between water, sewer, and streets.

01:32:26.279 --> 01:32:28.560
And with the street work and everything we got on,

01:32:28.560 --> 01:32:29.840
it's just a hassle.

01:32:29.840 --> 01:32:32.079
They're losing a lot of time chasing around town,

01:32:32.079 --> 01:32:34.039
trying to get equipment moved around.

01:32:35.079 --> 01:32:36.260
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:32:36.260 --> 01:32:37.100
Shadle.

01:32:37.100 --> 01:32:37.920
Aye.

01:32:37.920 --> 01:32:38.760
Sanders.

01:32:38.760 --> 01:32:39.600
Aye.

01:32:39.600 --> 01:32:40.420
Sellers.

01:32:40.420 --> 01:32:41.260
Aye.

01:32:41.260 --> 01:32:42.079
Klemm.

01:32:42.079 --> 01:32:42.920
Aye.

01:32:42.920 --> 01:32:43.760
Johnson.

01:32:43.760 --> 01:32:44.579
Aye.

01:32:44.579 --> 01:32:45.420
Simmons.

01:32:45.420 --> 01:32:46.260
Aye.

01:32:46.260 --> 01:32:47.079
Parker.

01:32:47.079 --> 01:32:47.920
Aye.

01:32:47.920 --> 01:32:48.760
And Stacy.

01:32:48.760 --> 01:32:49.600
Aye.

01:32:49.600 --> 01:32:50.420
The resolution is adopted eight to zero.

01:32:50.420 --> 01:32:52.640
Item number 14 is adoption of resolution 20,

01:32:52.640 --> 01:32:57.220
25107. Could you please read this? Resolution authorizing its support to the

01:32:57.220 --> 01:33:01.579
Illinois Department of Transportation's Safe Routes to School program. Manager

01:33:01.579 --> 01:33:06.199
Boyer. Thank you, Your Honor. The City of Freeport has several school crossings

01:33:06.199 --> 01:33:10.520
that are dated and require equipment repair and replacement for the safety of

01:33:10.520 --> 01:33:15.319
school children crossing the busy streets. The public works staff has

01:33:15.319 --> 01:33:21.659
identified a STRS that's Safe Routes to School State Grant opportunity to fund

01:33:21.659 --> 01:33:24.020
and the replacement of this equipment.

01:33:24.020 --> 01:33:25.899
The IDOT Department of Transportation

01:33:25.899 --> 01:33:28.739
has a safe routes to school program

01:33:28.739 --> 01:33:31.659
that is grant opportunities for potential equipment

01:33:31.659 --> 01:33:34.220
replacements of safe school crossing equipment.

01:33:34.220 --> 01:33:36.899
The new lighting LED systems installed

01:33:36.899 --> 01:33:40.180
are solar-based replacements with much brighter warning

01:33:40.180 --> 01:33:41.100
equipment.

01:33:41.100 --> 01:33:42.539
And this grant, if awarded, would

01:33:42.539 --> 01:33:46.979
be used for $250,000 of equipment replacement.

01:33:46.979 --> 01:33:49.739
A formal resolution will be brought to city council

01:33:49.739 --> 01:34:19.739
must be passed as part of the application. And that is what we're asking for today. So as far as the Safe Routes to School key points, it's again a $250,000 maximum grant per project. There is no matching fund for the first year. And this is a competitive application. Safe Routes to School grants can also only be used for construction and safety funding. Engineering fees cannot be included in this grant award. And application deadline is October 15. And we are partnering

01:34:19.739 --> 01:34:24.699
with the Freeport School District 145 on application support and staff recommends

01:34:24.699 --> 01:34:28.859
City Council that we pursue this grant opportunity. Is there a motion to adopt?

01:34:28.859 --> 01:34:36.590
Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Johnson,

01:34:36.590 --> 01:34:49.989
Alderman Sanders. Yeah, we're venturing into a public entity to help offset or to

01:34:49.989 --> 01:34:50.989
and so forth.

01:34:50.989 --> 01:34:58.310
And I think that will help them to reconstruct the safety protocols for the school.

01:34:58.310 --> 01:35:06.029
And if I'm not mistaken, you also mentioned the fact that they will also help funding.

01:35:06.029 --> 01:35:15.149
Does it help funding the project or are we just relying on a grant to make that distinction?

01:35:15.149 --> 01:35:22.210
So my whole thing is, when I'm hearing things, it sounds like if we're getting a grant, where

01:35:22.210 --> 01:35:30.229
does the school get involved in this whole scenario and what we should be, and how we

01:35:30.229 --> 01:35:39.550
should be functioning with the city to couple this project together with them?

01:35:39.550 --> 01:35:47.710
Is there discounts? Is there fundings other than grants that is going to help offset this

01:35:47.710 --> 01:35:54.590
project? Is that what we're looking at? Well, what we're looking at pursuing a $250,000

01:35:54.590 --> 01:36:00.029
grant to upgrade crossing signals in front of the schools that are in the right of way.

01:36:00.029 --> 01:36:05.229
We're actually just seeking the school district support in the pursuit of this outside funding

01:36:05.229 --> 01:36:07.229
so that we can improve those crossing guards.

01:36:07.229 --> 01:36:08.229
Right.

01:36:08.229 --> 01:36:09.229
Anyone else?

01:36:09.229 --> 01:36:10.229
Okay.

01:36:10.229 --> 01:36:13.229
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:36:13.229 --> 01:36:14.229
Shadle?

01:36:14.229 --> 01:36:15.229
Aye.

01:36:15.229 --> 01:36:16.229
Sanders?

01:36:16.229 --> 01:36:17.229
Aye.

01:36:17.229 --> 01:36:18.229
Sellers?

01:36:18.229 --> 01:36:19.229
Aye.

01:36:19.229 --> 01:36:20.229
Klemm?

01:36:20.229 --> 01:36:21.229
Aye.

01:36:21.229 --> 01:36:22.229
Johnson?

01:36:22.229 --> 01:36:23.229
Aye.

01:36:23.229 --> 01:36:24.229
Simmons?

01:36:24.229 --> 01:36:25.229
Aye.

01:36:25.229 --> 01:36:26.229
Parker?

01:36:26.229 --> 01:36:27.229
Aye.

01:36:27.229 --> 01:36:28.229
Stacy?

01:36:28.229 --> 01:36:29.229
Aye.

01:36:29.229 --> 01:36:30.229
The resolution is adopted, 8-0.

01:36:30.229 --> 01:36:31.229
Item number 15 is the adoption of resolution 2025108.

01:36:31.229 --> 01:36:32.829
Could you please read this?

01:36:32.829 --> 01:36:38.109
Authorizing its support to the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Open Space Land Acquisition

01:36:38.109 --> 01:36:40.069
Development Grant.

01:36:40.069 --> 01:36:41.069
Manager Boyer.

01:36:41.069 --> 01:36:42.069
Thank you, Your Honor.

01:36:42.069 --> 01:36:47.189
The Illinois Department of Natural Resources administers the Open Space Land Acquisition

01:36:47.189 --> 01:36:54.569
and Development Grant or OSLAD grant program to support local outdoor recreation projects.

01:36:54.569 --> 01:36:59.550
The city intends to submit for an OSLAD application for the Pocket Park on West Stevenson, formerly

01:36:59.550 --> 01:37:14.289
OZLAD requires a governing body resolution authorizing application submittal and acknowledging

01:37:14.289 --> 01:37:17.090
program conditions if funding is awarded.

01:37:17.090 --> 01:37:22.609
The attached resolution uses the IDNR prescribed language for OZLAD applications and passing

01:37:22.609 --> 01:37:26.750
the resolution enables staff and other partners to finalize and submit the application ahead

01:37:26.750 --> 01:37:28.350
of the program.

01:37:28.350 --> 01:37:33.949
The City is listed by the IDNR as a disadvantaged community, which allows an application for

01:37:33.949 --> 01:37:38.670
up to $600,000 in OZLAD funding without any local match.

01:37:38.670 --> 01:37:44.109
Greater Freeport Partnership received recently an award of $50,000 through the T-Mobile grant.

01:37:44.109 --> 01:37:46.930
It will also be used in the funding of this package.

01:37:46.930 --> 01:37:51.750
An application deadline is September 30th, so staff is targeting Council's action on

01:37:51.750 --> 01:37:55.829
September 2nd today to meet submittal timing.

01:37:55.829 --> 01:37:59.909
There is no immediate general fund impact for the application resolution.

01:37:59.909 --> 01:38:05.029
As a disadvantaged community applicant, the city may request up to $600,000 with no local

01:38:05.029 --> 01:38:07.270
match under the OSLAD.

01:38:07.270 --> 01:38:13.989
The GFP T-Mobile $50,000 grant contribution will further enhance the scope and staff recommends

01:38:13.989 --> 01:38:18.829
moving forward with allowing staff to pursue this grant.

01:38:18.829 --> 01:38:19.989
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:38:19.989 --> 01:38:20.989
So moved.

01:38:20.989 --> 01:38:21.989
Second.

01:38:21.989 --> 01:38:27.989
The motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers. Discussion on the grant.

01:38:27.989 --> 01:38:29.989
I have a question.

01:38:29.989 --> 01:38:31.989
Alderman Simmons.

01:38:31.989 --> 01:38:37.989
Is this the park in the area next to Joe's that you're speaking of, or is this another parking park?

01:38:37.989 --> 01:38:39.989
Yes, you're correct.

01:38:39.989 --> 01:38:41.989
It's adjacent to Joe's.

01:38:41.989 --> 01:38:43.989
Alderman Stacy?

01:38:43.989 --> 01:39:02.789
You know, these little pocket parks does nothing for our kids in 3rd and 5th Ward and we need

01:39:02.789 --> 01:39:06.989
a park for our kids to play in.

01:39:06.989 --> 01:39:11.149
I have said that since I've been on the council.

01:39:11.149 --> 01:39:12.809
Can we turn this into a park?

01:39:12.809 --> 01:39:15.789
Can we turn that into a park?

01:39:15.789 --> 01:39:22.710
And now this is the second time these little pocket parks have come up.

01:39:22.710 --> 01:39:27.229
We need a real park for our kids in third and fifth ward.

01:39:27.229 --> 01:39:30.949
You do realize that this is in the third ward?

01:39:30.949 --> 01:39:32.949
It's a pocket park.

01:39:32.949 --> 01:39:33.949
Okay.

01:39:33.949 --> 01:39:35.109
Any other discussion?

01:39:35.109 --> 01:39:38.359
It's not a park.

01:39:38.359 --> 01:39:41.000
If there's no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:42.000
There is.

01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:42.020
There is.

01:39:42.020 --> 01:39:52.750
I agree with Alderman, Stacy, as far as the plan that I saw for this park is great for

01:39:52.750 --> 01:39:59.810
the downtown community, but as far as a small playground area for the kids over in the 3rd,

01:39:59.810 --> 01:40:06.649
5th Ward area close to the King Center, this does nothing for them. And there has already

01:40:06.649 --> 01:40:07.649
Banner.

01:40:07.649 --> 01:40:12.409
We've been a grant awarded for that pocket part, so I'm not sure why we don't use this

01:40:12.409 --> 01:40:15.850
grant for another area in a different pocket part.

01:40:15.850 --> 01:40:16.850
Oldman-Sellers?

01:40:16.850 --> 01:40:17.850
I think...

01:40:17.850 --> 01:40:23.850
Well, no, no, no, I think my question needs an answer.

01:40:23.850 --> 01:40:24.850
What was your question?

01:40:24.850 --> 01:40:29.770
My question is, why aren't we considering any other areas where we can actually put

01:40:29.770 --> 01:40:32.770
a small playground in, something like Milton Park?

01:40:32.770 --> 01:40:37.250
Well, this resolution is about approving this grant.

01:40:37.250 --> 01:40:40.649
It's not about a discussion on parks.

01:40:40.649 --> 01:40:44.890
It is, though, because it's why wasn't this grant,

01:40:44.890 --> 01:40:48.130
why wasn't the application for a different area?

01:40:48.130 --> 01:40:50.130
Seeing as we already got the T-Mobile grant

01:40:50.130 --> 01:40:53.289
for this specific park downtown.

01:40:53.289 --> 01:40:56.210
I'm not against the park downtown, but for this grant,

01:40:56.210 --> 01:41:04.449
why not apply for a different area?

01:41:04.449 --> 01:41:06.250
You want to take a shot at that?

01:41:06.250 --> 01:41:07.369
I'll take a shot at it.

01:41:07.369 --> 01:41:10.270
I know that the pocket park was discussed for probably

01:41:10.270 --> 01:41:13.989
and has had a plan associated with it for about five,

01:41:13.989 --> 01:41:16.029
well, I'd say probably five years.

01:41:17.350 --> 01:41:19.250
I know there were designs for it

01:41:19.250 --> 01:41:23.270
and it went through several layers of grant applications.

01:41:23.270 --> 01:41:26.069
And I think certainly if there's other areas

01:41:26.069 --> 01:41:30.789
that council members or anyone from the public

01:41:30.789 --> 01:41:33.909
would like to get started on a plan, get started on it.

01:41:33.909 --> 01:41:37.369
Bring it to city manager Boyer's attention

01:41:37.369 --> 01:41:39.449
and get started on the planning process

01:41:39.449 --> 01:41:41.109
and what it would take to get a park.

01:41:41.109 --> 01:41:42.850
But I mean, this particular pocket park, I know,

01:41:42.850 --> 01:41:45.810
has been in plans and has been through a subject

01:41:45.810 --> 01:41:47.810
of applications for grants.

01:41:47.810 --> 01:41:49.529
For at least the four years I've been here

01:41:49.529 --> 01:41:52.210
and when I started here, it had already been

01:41:52.210 --> 01:41:56.529
through other iterations of planning and grant applications.

01:41:56.529 --> 01:41:59.470
So I mean, that's the short answer as to why

01:41:59.470 --> 01:42:00.470
Huffines.

01:42:00.470 --> 01:42:04.750
This particular parcel is up for the grant.

01:42:04.750 --> 01:42:09.329
The other parcels and properties we're talking about certainly could be in the future.

01:42:09.329 --> 01:42:14.109
Also would like to state that the City of Freeport doesn't own many parks.

01:42:14.109 --> 01:42:18.109
I believe this might be the only one and that the Park District owns many of its parks and

01:42:18.109 --> 01:42:19.770
owns that planning process.

01:42:19.770 --> 01:42:24.989
So if there's an existing park where citizens would like to see better facilities, that's

01:42:24.989 --> 01:42:27.390
certainly something to bring up to the Park District.

01:42:27.390 --> 01:42:30.430
if there's parcels of land that the city owns

01:42:30.430 --> 01:42:33.829
that council members would like to see

01:42:33.829 --> 01:42:35.869
maybe possibly investigated for a park.

01:42:35.869 --> 01:42:37.430
I think it's a great idea.

01:42:37.430 --> 01:42:39.470
And I think that's something to talk about

01:42:39.470 --> 01:42:42.550
with city manager Boyer in your weekly meetings.

01:42:42.550 --> 01:42:43.390
And you're right.

01:42:45.390 --> 01:42:47.229
Bring the park district to the table

01:42:47.229 --> 01:42:50.430
if you wanna have a playground in a certain area.

01:42:50.430 --> 01:42:51.270
Alderman Sellers.

01:42:51.270 --> 01:42:52.789
Yeah, I guess that's what I was gonna say.

01:42:52.789 --> 01:42:57.789
I know that when the King Center first came there,

01:42:58.069 --> 01:43:02.149
we had a small group of people that worked

01:43:02.149 --> 01:43:06.470
when George Galrap was mayor trying to get another park

01:43:06.470 --> 01:43:09.029
because they took away Henny Park.

01:43:09.029 --> 01:43:10.989
And that was years ago.

01:43:10.989 --> 01:43:14.270
And we were in with the park district.

01:43:14.270 --> 01:43:18.590
And I know about five years ago, me and Mr. Jim Ryan,

01:43:18.590 --> 01:43:22.770
we had discussion with the guy that's running

01:43:22.770 --> 01:43:24.989
the park district and that's something you have to go

01:43:24.989 --> 01:43:27.470
through the park district because they have all kinds

01:43:27.470 --> 01:43:30.850
of rules and regulations on how you can use the land

01:43:30.850 --> 01:43:32.250
and what kind of land.

01:43:32.250 --> 01:43:37.029
So I do agree because I grew up in a park

01:43:37.029 --> 01:43:40.510
and I do agree that the kids need a park in that area

01:43:40.510 --> 01:43:44.630
but it's, we need to, like the mayor said,

01:43:44.630 --> 01:43:47.069
we need to bring the park district to the table

01:43:47.069 --> 01:43:50.109
or go to the park district when they have their board meetings

01:43:50.109 --> 01:43:53.949
and talk about getting a park because we do need one.

01:43:53.949 --> 01:43:58.109
I have to object to what council just said

01:43:58.109 --> 01:44:02.050
because we have not fully done our homework

01:44:02.050 --> 01:44:04.750
when it comes to who has jurisdiction

01:44:05.789 --> 01:44:10.590
of anything that the city is administering

01:44:10.590 --> 01:44:15.590
to the city, public city, when it comes to any entity, parks

01:44:15.590 --> 01:44:18.430
and the city parks or whatever the case may be.

01:44:18.430 --> 01:44:21.529
I can't see why it is that we're consulting

01:44:21.529 --> 01:44:24.750
with the park district because the park district

01:44:24.750 --> 01:44:26.710
is not ever here.

01:44:26.710 --> 01:44:28.710
They're running their own scheme

01:44:28.710 --> 01:44:33.710
and we're not going to just push everything

01:44:33.750 --> 01:44:38.550
on the park district when the grant is for the city at large.

01:44:38.550 --> 01:44:43.550
And I'm like, who's governing this idea

01:44:43.550 --> 01:44:47.670
to submit anything to the park district to govern over it

01:44:47.670 --> 01:44:52.670
so they make determinations on how council is trying

01:44:52.710 --> 01:44:57.710
to submit recommendations and ideas for their district.

01:44:58.970 --> 01:45:02.970
And I don't think pocket parks have anything to do

01:45:02.970 --> 01:45:05.890
with the Freeport Park District

01:45:05.890 --> 01:45:09.909
when it comes to district areas.

01:45:09.909 --> 01:45:13.270
And I think if we're looking at council

01:45:13.270 --> 01:45:16.390
for consideration on how we should plan this,

01:45:16.390 --> 01:45:18.949
how we should go to the city manager

01:45:18.949 --> 01:45:21.869
and talk more about it and things of this nature.

01:45:21.869 --> 01:45:24.069
And while we're doing that,

01:45:24.069 --> 01:45:28.590
there is no park district board members or staff

01:45:28.590 --> 01:45:30.829
in the midst of this conversation.

01:45:30.829 --> 01:45:32.569
And so I think it's irrelevant for us

01:45:32.569 --> 01:45:36.189
to even make a suggestion that we implement

01:45:36.189 --> 01:45:39.350
another organization or another district department

01:45:39.350 --> 01:45:43.149
or whatever that has not been involved

01:45:43.149 --> 01:45:46.829
and any of the city council's decision making.

01:45:46.829 --> 01:45:51.109
So my thing is I think it's irrelevant for them to do that.

01:45:51.109 --> 01:45:53.829
And I think we should maintain a course

01:45:53.829 --> 01:45:57.270
where we collaborate with our city manager

01:45:57.270 --> 01:46:01.909
as council people to make these kinds of provisions

01:46:01.909 --> 01:46:03.270
for our district.

01:46:03.270 --> 01:46:05.270
I don't think we should have someone else

01:46:06.430 --> 01:46:08.750
having jurisdiction over our district

01:46:08.750 --> 01:46:11.189
on what we want to have in our district.

01:46:11.189 --> 01:46:12.989
And so that's my.

01:46:12.989 --> 01:46:15.909
and you are correct, that's nothing of this topic.

01:46:15.909 --> 01:46:18.390
So we kind of got to get out of that little rabbit hole.

01:46:18.390 --> 01:46:20.149
I'm just saying we need to be back.

01:46:20.149 --> 01:46:21.510
We're talking about parking.

01:46:21.510 --> 01:46:23.149
We're not talking about that.

01:46:23.149 --> 01:46:24.989
The park district was brought up.

01:46:24.989 --> 01:46:26.470
Did you just shush me?

01:46:26.470 --> 01:46:28.949
No, I didn't shush you.

01:46:28.949 --> 01:46:30.829
We need to be back.

01:46:30.829 --> 01:46:33.350
Mayor, if I shush you, you'll know I shush you.

01:46:33.350 --> 01:46:34.109
I'm not shushing you.

01:46:34.109 --> 01:46:35.789
Let's go back to the grant.

01:46:35.789 --> 01:46:39.270
Mr. Collins, point of order, please, thank you.

01:46:39.270 --> 01:46:41.229
This is about adopting the resolution

01:46:41.229 --> 01:46:42.590
to support this grant.

01:46:42.590 --> 01:47:12.590
I agree. But we don't need to talk about Park District stuff. Well, it came up. It actually came up. OK, so I would like to call point of order to bring us back to the topic. And if council would allow me to speak. Well, yes, we do need to come back to this topic. It's on the resolution to support this grant. And so is there any further discussion? I don't know if you heard me, but I would like to speak. Well, actually, Alderman Simmons, you've spoken twice already. Right. That's why. And if council will allow. That's correct. Only twice.

01:47:12.590 --> 01:47:16.590
So if there's no further discussion, Alderman Stacy?

01:47:16.590 --> 01:47:24.590
Excuse me, no, I thought, according to our rules, if I would like to speak again, Council will call a vote on that.

01:47:24.590 --> 01:47:36.590
Okay, you're correct. So let's take the role, Madam Clerk, on the approval of allowing Alderman Simmons another time to speak.

01:47:36.590 --> 01:47:38.590
Shadle?

01:47:38.590 --> 01:47:39.590
No.

01:47:39.590 --> 01:47:40.590
Sanders?

01:47:40.590 --> 01:47:41.590
Yes.

01:47:41.590 --> 01:48:20.640
Clem? Hi. Johnson? Hi. Simmons? Oh, yeah, you can vote. Is that a yes, Simmons? Yes. Parker? No. Stacy? Yes. It passes. Okay, so Alderman Simmons, go ahead. Thank you. That's funny that we would vote no. I don't speak much and when I speak, I speak quick. However, my question to the grant was, and a statement to what Director Duckman said I have spoken to,

01:48:20.640 --> 01:48:24.579
and I have been awarded by the county board members about land that we were then awarded

01:48:24.579 --> 01:48:31.680
and park district members about board members about getting a pocket park in our area.

01:48:31.680 --> 01:48:38.880
My question that was not answered is why is this particular grant for this area downtown

01:48:38.880 --> 01:48:44.640
when we already got a grant for that area downtown which only includes cornholes, cornhole

01:48:44.640 --> 01:48:45.640
games?

01:48:45.640 --> 01:48:50.520
Like this grant could be used more beneficially for us if we use it in a different area.

01:48:50.520 --> 01:48:56.720
Why was that not listed?

01:48:56.720 --> 01:48:58.000
Thank you all to person Simmons.

01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:02.039
I think I understand what you're asking.

01:49:02.039 --> 01:49:03.920
And I think what I was trying to explain before

01:49:03.920 --> 01:49:07.840
was that the pocket park that we're speaking of,

01:49:07.840 --> 01:49:10.020
that is the subject of this grant application,

01:49:10.020 --> 01:49:13.440
has been in a planning process for five years.

01:49:13.440 --> 01:49:17.440
And that is why, in particular, there

01:49:17.440 --> 01:49:19.399
have been multiple applications.

01:49:19.399 --> 01:49:21.399
I know there was a Commonwealth Edison grant that

01:49:21.399 --> 01:49:24.479
was applied for in 2020.

01:49:24.479 --> 01:49:31.119
There's a plan for this park that has been submitted for this grant application.

01:49:31.119 --> 01:49:36.039
And as I said earlier, I think that if there's another area in a different time

01:49:36.039 --> 01:49:40.000
where we have a plan for a parcel, or if it's own

01:49:40.000 --> 01:50:08.109
or if it's owned by the city I don't I think I'm sure City Manager Boyer would certainly want to talk about it or it could be brought to council a specific piece of property that the city owns that a park could be proposed I don't think it's I think it's a good idea I just know that there are plans and that this pocket park in particular has been in process for five years it didn't just get dreamt up overnight and that is the reason why it was a subject of this grant right now the city does not have

01:50:38.109 --> 01:50:39.510
Oh, that's the reason.

01:50:39.510 --> 01:50:40.869
Alderman Stacy.

01:50:40.869 --> 01:50:44.090
When there was discussion earlier this year,

01:50:44.090 --> 01:50:48.710
spoke about the property that City Manager Boyer wanted

01:50:48.710 --> 01:50:52.670
to buy in the Liberty area.

01:50:52.670 --> 01:50:57.149
I said then, could a park be put there?

01:50:57.149 --> 01:51:00.430
So it's not that we haven't searched this out

01:51:00.430 --> 01:51:02.670
and haven't tried to.

01:51:02.670 --> 01:51:05.789
I would also like to know how much does it cost

01:51:05.789 --> 01:51:12.710
to apply for this OSLAD grant.

01:51:12.710 --> 01:51:14.109
I'll be honest, and I haven't been

01:51:14.109 --> 01:51:15.350
a part of this grant application.

01:51:15.350 --> 01:51:19.109
That's why City Manager Boyer, I'm answering the question.

01:51:19.109 --> 01:51:21.630
To be fair, I haven't been part of this grant application.

01:51:21.630 --> 01:51:23.289
When I am part of a grant application,

01:51:23.289 --> 01:51:24.829
I certainly can't answer that question.

01:51:24.829 --> 01:51:26.909
I'm answering these questions because I've

01:51:26.909 --> 01:51:28.829
been aware of the pocket park.

01:51:28.829 --> 01:51:30.449
I know the Greater Free Park Partnership

01:51:30.449 --> 01:51:32.470
has done a great job moving it forward.

01:51:32.470 --> 01:51:34.970
I've been part of the planning process for quite some time.

01:51:34.970 --> 01:51:36.989
I just, in particular, have not put together

01:51:36.989 --> 01:51:37.949
for this grant application.

01:51:37.949 --> 01:51:40.069
So I can't answer that question intelligently.

01:51:40.069 --> 01:51:42.850
Okay, I need an answer, City Manager Boyer.

01:51:42.850 --> 01:51:46.029
You talked about a Commonwealth Edison grant.

01:51:46.029 --> 01:51:47.850
How much did we pay for that one?

01:51:47.850 --> 01:51:51.550
Now you're talking about a OSLAD grant.

01:51:51.550 --> 01:51:55.710
How much is it gonna cost the city to apply for a grant

01:51:55.710 --> 01:52:00.710
that we may or may not get for another pocket park?

01:52:02.029 --> 01:52:04.289
Actually, Darren is the one that needs to answer this.

01:52:04.289 --> 01:52:06.829
Darren, you guys are writing the grant.

01:52:06.829 --> 01:52:10.630
part of the master service agreement at $7,500 for the application.

01:52:11.229 --> 01:52:18.010
And I want to, um, also remind everybody for the Osled grant.

01:52:18.010 --> 01:52:22.630
So, uh, just trying to clarify this from what I've been listening to the city of

01:52:22.630 --> 01:52:27.210
Freeport is not typically in the park business.

01:52:27.350 --> 01:52:31.010
That's the park district's responsibility with their own taxing body.

01:52:31.270 --> 01:52:35.529
So when you're looking at playground type equipment, those type of parks,

01:52:35.529 --> 01:52:38.829
if you look around town, all the ones that are maintained are maintained by

01:52:38.829 --> 01:52:40.369
the park district, not the city.

01:52:40.369 --> 01:52:44.250
We do, I believe, uh, I'm pretty sure I'm correct.

01:52:44.289 --> 01:52:48.029
The city does not, the city proper city council does not own

01:52:48.029 --> 01:52:49.350
any parks within the city.

01:52:50.189 --> 01:52:53.850
The, the grant that we're talking about the pocket park is what they call

01:52:53.869 --> 01:53:00.130
an urban park, which is very high on the list of Osled to have parks in

01:53:00.130 --> 01:53:04.010
downtown communities where there's lots of pavement structure and it's not

01:53:04.010 --> 01:53:05.609
We have a very traditional type of park.

01:53:05.609 --> 01:53:09.470
This is a park that brings in games

01:53:09.470 --> 01:53:13.369
and other things like bags or tabletop games,

01:53:13.369 --> 01:53:14.710
other items like that,

01:53:14.710 --> 01:53:16.930
that can be utilized in a small space.

01:53:16.930 --> 01:53:18.770
The space between these two buildings

01:53:18.770 --> 01:53:23.369
is not enormous to overcome or to put things in.

01:53:23.369 --> 01:53:27.489
And so if the city were to make a park in this location,

01:53:27.489 --> 01:53:30.050
it would be a very low maintenance park

01:53:30.050 --> 01:53:31.270
that doesn't need a lot of work

01:53:31.270 --> 01:53:33.649
because we don't have additional staff members

01:53:33.649 --> 01:53:36.329
to take care of parks, right?

01:53:36.329 --> 01:53:38.090
Parks need a lot of maintenance

01:53:38.090 --> 01:53:42.369
between trees, lawn care, garbage, upkeep.

01:53:42.369 --> 01:53:43.890
This would be more of an urban park

01:53:43.890 --> 01:53:45.930
which is gonna have a lot more concrete,

01:53:45.930 --> 01:53:48.210
very little grass or maybe even turf,

01:53:48.210 --> 01:53:50.310
something that doesn't need to be maintained.

01:53:50.310 --> 01:53:53.489
Okay, I don't care about all that description.

01:53:53.489 --> 01:53:58.489
It's gonna cost $7,500 just to apply for a grant

01:53:59.770 --> 01:54:01.569
that we may not even get.

01:54:01.569 --> 01:54:07.569
Yes, ma'am. It's a lot of work to apply for these grants.

01:54:07.569 --> 01:54:11.569
Any further, Alderman Sanders?

01:54:11.569 --> 01:54:16.569
There is pocket parks throughout the city, am I correct?

01:54:16.569 --> 01:54:19.569
Oh, well.

01:54:19.569 --> 01:54:22.569
I believe they're called neighborhood parks.

01:54:22.569 --> 01:54:26.569
Well, what do you call a pocket park?

01:54:26.569 --> 01:54:29.569
What are those?

01:54:29.569 --> 01:54:32.409
We don't have a pocket park.

01:54:32.409 --> 01:54:37.409
Well there's one located right there on Iroquois and State Street, isn't it?

01:54:37.409 --> 01:54:40.210
I believe that's called the neighborhood park by the park district.

01:54:40.210 --> 01:54:43.210
So it's by the park district?

01:54:43.210 --> 01:54:44.210
Do they take care of that?

01:54:44.210 --> 01:54:48.529
The one at Iroquois I believe actually is owned by the homeowner that lives there.

01:54:48.529 --> 01:54:51.010
If I'm not correct, we did that research a few months ago.

01:54:51.010 --> 01:54:53.409
Okay, what about the one that's located on...

01:54:53.409 --> 01:54:55.090
The owner's dead.

01:54:55.090 --> 01:54:56.329
We went through that.

01:54:56.329 --> 01:54:57.329
What about the one...

01:54:57.329 --> 01:54:58.329
That doesn't mean the city owns it.

01:54:58.329 --> 01:55:07.180
Yeah. What about the little small park that sits over on Blackhawk and Broadway? Is that

01:55:07.180 --> 01:55:08.180
a pocket park?

01:55:08.180 --> 01:55:10.220
Okay. Can we get back on topic?

01:55:10.220 --> 01:55:12.420
We are. I'm talking about a pocket park.

01:55:12.420 --> 01:55:14.220
But that's not a pocket park. You're asking questions-

01:55:14.220 --> 01:55:16.159
I'm asking a question. Is that a pocket park?

01:55:16.159 --> 01:55:20.380
It has nothing to do with this grant. So let's stay on topic of this grant.

01:55:20.380 --> 01:55:21.380
Mayor, I-

01:55:21.380 --> 01:55:23.460
Do you have a question about the grant?

01:55:23.460 --> 01:55:29.979
Mayor, I resent that remark you just made because that was not proper for you to

01:55:29.979 --> 01:55:34.859
inject that. I'm trying to find out I'm trying to find out information what kind

01:55:34.859 --> 01:55:40.579
of pocket parks description has is it pocket parks or is it neighborhood parks

01:55:40.579 --> 01:55:44.539
and that's what I'm that's what I'm talking about. A pocket park is typically

01:55:44.539 --> 01:55:49.720
between two buildings. You know what Mayor, I didn't know you was a I didn't

01:55:49.720 --> 01:55:51.720
and

01:55:53.020 --> 01:55:55.020
the rest of the board.

01:55:56.180 --> 01:55:58.180
So, I'm going to go ahead and

01:55:59.880 --> 01:56:01.880
ask you to talk about the grant.

01:56:02.979 --> 01:56:04.979
Let's talk about the grant.

01:56:06.279 --> 01:56:08.279
Well, the thing is, I am talking about it because you're not

01:56:09.399 --> 01:56:11.399
allowing me to finish what I'm trying to talk about.

01:56:12.399 --> 01:56:14.399
Do you have a question about the grant?

01:56:15.020 --> 01:56:17.020
Why are you being specific?

01:56:17.020 --> 01:56:51.600
No, I'm not talking. Anybody else have anything to discuss? The council is going to have this. If there's no further discussion, Madam Clerk? Are you ready for the roll man? Shadle. Aye. Sanders. No. Sellers. Aye. Klemm. Aye. Johnson. Aye. Simmons. No. Parker. Aye. Stacy. No. The resolution is adopted five to three. Item number 16. Could you please read this for the record? Approval of bid, which was opened on August 27th, 2025.

01:56:51.600 --> 01:56:52.600
Huffines.

01:56:52.600 --> 01:56:53.600
Thank you.

01:56:53.600 --> 01:56:54.600
Thank you, Madam Mayor.

01:56:54.600 --> 01:57:07.520
City staff has published in the Journal of Standard a request for proposal for the demolition

01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:12.199
and asbestos abatement of eight properties, and that was published on August 21st in the

01:57:12.199 --> 01:57:17.920
Journal of Standard, and then a bid opening was held August 27th at 9 a.m.

01:57:17.920 --> 01:57:22.439
We've already received bids from three contractors and I've provided an analysis below which

01:57:22.439 --> 01:57:31.260
is up on the screen as well and based upon the bids received, staff is recommending moving

01:57:31.260 --> 01:57:37.399
forward with Klechner excavating in the amount of $103,000 as they are the lowest responsible

01:57:37.399 --> 01:57:41.640
bidder in their lump sum bid for all eight properties.

01:57:41.640 --> 01:57:42.640
Motion approved.

01:57:42.640 --> 01:57:43.640
Second.

01:57:43.640 --> 01:57:47.180
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.

01:57:47.180 --> 01:57:48.680
Discussion on the bids.

01:57:49.859 --> 01:57:51.739
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:57:51.739 --> 01:57:52.579
Shadle?

01:57:52.579 --> 01:57:53.399
Aye.

01:57:53.399 --> 01:57:54.239
Sanders?

01:57:54.239 --> 01:57:55.079
Aye.

01:57:55.079 --> 01:57:55.899
Sellers?

01:57:55.899 --> 01:57:56.739
Aye.

01:57:56.739 --> 01:57:57.579
Klemm?

01:57:57.579 --> 01:57:58.399
Aye.

01:57:58.399 --> 01:57:59.239
Johnson?

01:57:59.239 --> 01:58:00.079
Aye.

01:58:00.079 --> 01:58:00.899
Simmons?

01:58:00.899 --> 01:58:01.739
Aye.

01:58:01.739 --> 01:58:02.579
Parker?

01:58:02.579 --> 01:58:03.420
Aye.

01:58:03.420 --> 01:58:04.239
And Stacy?

01:58:04.239 --> 01:58:06.930
Aye.

01:58:06.930 --> 01:58:08.750
The motion passes eight to zero.

01:58:08.750 --> 01:58:11.250
Item number 17 is a presentation regarding the city's role

01:58:11.250 --> 01:58:12.869
in landlord-tenant relationships.

01:58:12.869 --> 01:58:23.699
Manager Boyer.

01:58:23.699 --> 01:58:26.159
Thank you, Your Honor.

01:58:26.159 --> 01:58:29.119
So recently, there was a large portfolio

01:58:29.119 --> 01:58:35.399
that changed hands between Tim Chapman and Pied Piper Realty

01:58:35.399 --> 01:58:37.079
LLC.

01:58:37.079 --> 01:58:40.479
There was a number of different properties here.

01:58:40.479 --> 01:58:45.600
Pre-port portfolios purchased approximately 225 properties,

01:58:45.600 --> 01:58:49.460
with about 47 of those being with a current lease.

01:58:49.460 --> 01:58:53.359
We've got 53 duplexes, and we've got several of them

01:58:53.359 --> 01:58:55.119
that were considered owner occupied

01:58:55.119 --> 01:58:58.159
as they were set up that way with Tim Chapman.

01:58:58.159 --> 01:59:02.199
So approximately 193 total properties

01:59:03.680 --> 01:59:07.760
remained or aren't occupied or unrenovated at this time.

01:59:07.760 --> 01:59:10.279
A little background, a letter was sent out

01:59:12.600 --> 01:59:15.399
July 29th to the tenants.

01:59:16.319 --> 01:59:18.000
There's quite a bit here,

01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:23.000
but the big picture is the month of month

01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:29.039
month renters were notified that their effective lease would be over September

01:59:29.039 --> 01:59:32.840
1st and their rent will be adjusted at that time so these are month-to-month

01:59:32.840 --> 01:59:39.880
renters generally speaking these month-to-month is

01:59:39.880 --> 01:59:41.439
is convenient from a a runner standpoint because they don't have to make any

01:59:41.439 --> 01:59:47.600
long-term commitments however it does provide flexibility also the fixed term

01:59:47.600 --> 01:59:53.039
tenants the current leases remain unchanged until expiration and that was

01:59:53.039 --> 01:59:59.399
notified in this letter there was quite a few bits you can look it up for your if

01:59:59.399 --> 02:00:03.720
you want to I can provide you a copy of this but the discussion the new leases

02:00:03.720 --> 02:00:09.600
there would be an inspection scheduled started reaching out to people in person

02:00:09.600 --> 02:00:15.180
called August 5th to the month-on-month tenants to kind of start discussing what

02:00:15.180 --> 02:00:22.880
what to do they wanted engagement with the the renters and then also reaching

02:00:22.880 --> 02:00:28.079
out for the in-person meeting where you're currently residing would

02:00:28.079 --> 02:00:31.680
basically be the topic of discussion whether it is suitable what need to be

02:00:31.680 --> 02:00:38.600
Perry would need to move forward. Just to give you a quick update on some of the

02:00:38.600 --> 02:00:45.600
commentary that's been out there. This is HUD's free market analysis and

02:00:45.600 --> 02:00:53.119
essentially is showing that there's a range of reasonable range within the

02:00:53.119 --> 02:00:57.399
various units that are available. Obviously if you look down here are some

02:00:57.399 --> 02:01:02.500
of these houses I can't verify this 100% but I've heard that there's some very

02:01:02.500 --> 02:01:09.199
low rents for like a three and four bedroom home that HUD actually proposes

02:01:09.199 --> 02:01:15.439
here should be a little higher than than that amount so the rents while being a

02:01:15.439 --> 02:01:23.960
little different kind of fall in line overall with HUD's guidelines. The city's

02:01:23.960 --> 02:01:29.560
Roll. So there's, as we move forward, one of the things we've been working on, especially with

02:01:29.560 --> 02:01:36.039
Chapman Properties before the portfolio was sold, was that we needed all landlords to register with

02:01:36.039 --> 02:01:42.600
the landlord database. That gives us the ability to follow up on complaints and code enforcement

02:01:42.600 --> 02:01:48.359
actions. It also gives us the ability to know who's in what unit and who owns that unit.

02:01:48.359 --> 02:01:53.000
So we're working on that. As a matter of fact, Ptolemy, I believe when we get into the discussion

02:01:53.000 --> 02:01:57.279
session or section Wayne will be kind of providing a little bit of an update on

02:01:57.279 --> 02:02:03.000
that and then we can also enforce ordinance and codes for the properties

02:02:03.000 --> 02:02:07.840
this works through our code enforcement supervisor and our code enforcement

02:02:07.840 --> 02:02:11.840
hearings this has been relatively successful but it is you know we have

02:02:11.840 --> 02:02:16.359
limited resources and it is somewhat of a slow process so we've had a number of

02:02:16.359 --> 02:02:20.560
folks I don't know that the complete number the most up-to-date number but

02:02:20.560 --> 02:02:34.640
Yes, I believe the number we have since the takeover of these properties, I believe we've

02:02:34.640 --> 02:02:40.239
had three tenant inspection requests.

02:02:40.239 --> 02:02:45.159
So three, that gives us the authority to go into three of those units.

02:02:45.159 --> 02:02:51.199
So state law, just recapping some of the more pertinent sections, so Rent Control Preemption

02:02:51.199 --> 02:02:56.039
Act, you can read that, but a unit of local government shall not enact, maintain, or enforce

02:02:56.039 --> 02:02:59.960
any ordinance or resolution that would have the effect of controlling the amount of rent

02:02:59.960 --> 02:03:04.079
charged for leasing private residential or commercial property.

02:03:04.079 --> 02:03:09.359
And then again in section 10 of the act, a home rule unit may not regulate or control

02:03:09.359 --> 02:03:14.079
the amount of rent charged for leasing private residential or commercial properties.

02:03:14.079 --> 02:03:18.720
In addition to that, Illinois Attorney General states that in a week to week or month to

02:03:18.720 --> 02:03:24.119
month tenants, landlord can raise your rent by any amount if he or she gives you proper

02:03:24.119 --> 02:03:28.680
notice and Illinois does not have a rent control law, therefore your landlord can raise your

02:03:28.680 --> 02:03:32.239
rent as much as he or she deems necessary.

02:03:32.239 --> 02:03:34.000
So what are the next steps?

02:03:34.000 --> 02:03:40.939
We have Pied Piper Group represented here today as well as Attorney Cox and Director

02:03:40.939 --> 02:03:46.779
Duckman, who can speak to any of the more precise points on the situation as we

02:03:46.779 --> 02:03:50.140
move forward. I think there's a suggestion that we could increase the

02:03:50.140 --> 02:03:56.220
number of notice days for a rent increase from 30 to 60 days. That would be

02:03:56.220 --> 02:04:00.659
fine with someone with a signed lease. However, if people are on a month a month

02:04:00.659 --> 02:04:06.779
already, that does present some concerns, but certainly not insurmountable. So

02:04:06.779 --> 02:04:12.819
So, anyway, as we go through this process tonight, I hope this becomes enlightening.

02:04:12.819 --> 02:04:17.340
I think we've just hit a quick summary of some of the back and forth commentary that's

02:04:17.340 --> 02:04:23.380
been online and discussion with individuals and also some of the tenants.

02:04:23.380 --> 02:04:28.539
So with that, I'd like to go ahead and move to the next item, which is discussion.

02:04:28.539 --> 02:04:34.979
Okay, so let's try to keep this to this part of the discussion to the city's role.

02:04:34.979 --> 02:04:41.619
I know there are other things that Alderman, Stacy, and Klemm wanted to discuss, but let's keep this part of it just to the city's role.

02:04:41.619 --> 02:04:43.619
Attorney Cox, did you want to add to anything?

02:04:43.619 --> 02:04:48.949
Alderman Sanders.

02:04:48.949 --> 02:04:51.949
Are you calling me now?

02:04:51.949 --> 02:04:52.949
Yes.

02:04:52.949 --> 02:04:53.949
Oh, okay.

02:04:53.949 --> 02:04:55.949
On the city's role.

02:04:55.949 --> 02:05:06.029
Now, my question would be is the state of Illinois attorney office is the ones that are stipulating

02:05:08.909 --> 02:05:15.869
jurisdiction over this particular matter that we're discussing in our agenda right now,

02:05:15.869 --> 02:05:22.590
is what we're saying. What the city's role is, correct. Yeah, and because that is happening,

02:05:22.590 --> 02:05:29.949
because that has not obscured the fact that we should be able to also make

02:05:29.949 --> 02:05:36.029
amendments. We have not talked about whether we can amend anything to what

02:05:36.029 --> 02:05:42.909
the state's attorney had put in the role of how

02:05:42.909 --> 02:05:50.510
they govern this. So have we challenged this as a council to see if any

02:05:50.510 --> 02:05:51.510
and others.

02:05:51.510 --> 02:05:57.670
Any amendments can be introduced to make changes.

02:05:57.670 --> 02:06:03.829
I hate to find out that that is a possibility if we have not done our homework and we're

02:06:03.829 --> 02:06:10.590
sitting on something that probably can be amended or altered or changed.

02:06:10.590 --> 02:06:18.310
How current are we with the update of how old is this memo that we're looking at?

02:06:18.310 --> 02:06:19.789
How old is it?

02:06:19.789 --> 02:06:26.949
and if things have changed, who looked into whether or not there has been major changes

02:06:26.949 --> 02:06:34.989
that will make a difference to those renters when landlords are raising their rent and

02:06:34.989 --> 02:06:35.989
everything?

02:06:35.989 --> 02:06:39.470
Have anything come down the pipeline that changes anything?

02:06:39.470 --> 02:06:40.750
Have we done that?

02:06:40.750 --> 02:06:43.470
Have we looked into that particular matter?

02:06:43.470 --> 02:06:48.149
and so I would suggest or whoever's presenting

02:06:48.149 --> 02:06:53.069
this particular memo to have more answers for us.

02:06:53.069 --> 02:06:56.430
As a council, we can look into the matters ourself,

02:06:56.430 --> 02:06:58.350
but we're looking at our city manager

02:06:58.350 --> 02:07:01.189
because he's managing the city.

02:07:01.189 --> 02:07:06.189
And so my question would be is, can we look into it further

02:07:06.590 --> 02:07:10.750
to see if there's any other possibilities or amendments

02:07:10.750 --> 02:07:11.750
and I.

02:07:11.750 --> 02:07:13.989
I think there's a lot of work that could be implemented into this whole scenario of this

02:07:13.989 --> 02:07:20.149
member because the way it's set right now, there's no challenging base going on from

02:07:20.149 --> 02:07:24.949
council or to the general public within the city.

02:07:24.949 --> 02:07:31.789
There should be a mechanism for us to at least challenge what we're seeing here so we just

02:07:31.789 --> 02:07:38.930
don't leave it up to the state's attorney to make the priority decisions for the city.

02:07:38.930 --> 02:07:44.789
Okay, so I'm going to ask Attorney Cox to address that, but we legally can't tell a

02:07:44.789 --> 02:07:51.850
business what they can charge for rent, but we can talk about terminating lease, correct,

02:07:51.850 --> 02:07:52.850
Attorney Cox?

02:07:52.850 --> 02:07:53.850
Well, yeah.

02:07:53.850 --> 02:08:01.439
Hi, thank you.

02:08:01.439 --> 02:08:05.779
So the state has enacted, as Manager Boyer pointed out, something called the Rent Control

02:08:05.779 --> 02:08:11.059
Preemption Act, and that is an express limitation of any municipality's authority, including

02:08:11.059 --> 02:08:19.340
Can you speak up because we can't hear you? Can you turn him up? Can you turn up his microphone?

02:08:19.340 --> 02:08:27.899
I'll get closer. Everybody hear me okay? The state has enacted, as Manager Boyer pointed

02:08:27.899 --> 02:08:33.579
out, something called the Rent Control Preemption Act, and that is an express limitation of

02:08:33.579 --> 02:08:39.059
any municipality, including a home rule municipality, which Freeport happens to be. It's a limitation

02:08:39.059 --> 02:08:41.059
and

02:08:42.059 --> 02:08:44.059
John.

02:08:45.059 --> 02:08:47.059
So, we have to be very careful about the

02:08:48.059 --> 02:08:51.059
decision of that authority. Any municipality in the state of

02:08:51.059 --> 02:08:55.059
Illinois derives its authority from the state. State in turn

02:08:55.059 --> 02:08:59.059
derives its authority from the federal Constitution. However,

02:08:59.059 --> 02:09:04.059
if the state doesn't give us the authority or in a home rule

02:09:04.059 --> 02:09:08.059
situation specifically takes it away, then we can't alter that.

02:09:08.059 --> 02:09:12.940
So when we talk about rent control, which is, I believe, the vast majority of the complaints

02:09:12.940 --> 02:09:16.260
here were rent spikes.

02:09:16.260 --> 02:09:18.539
The city cannot regulate that.

02:09:18.539 --> 02:09:21.500
That power was taken away from us by Springfield.

02:09:21.500 --> 02:09:22.500
And that's that.

02:09:22.500 --> 02:09:23.500
Okay.

02:09:23.500 --> 02:09:24.500
Thank you.

02:09:24.500 --> 02:09:25.500
Alderman Stacey?

02:09:25.500 --> 02:09:29.899
We don't want to know what the city can't do.

02:09:29.899 --> 02:09:33.260
We want to know what the city can do.

02:09:33.260 --> 02:09:35.979
There is some things that can be put in

02:09:35.979 --> 02:09:41.319
and many other things that can be put in this ordinance that would give our constituents

02:09:41.319 --> 02:09:43.859
some support.

02:09:43.859 --> 02:09:50.460
And we want to talk about Chapman, but let the record show that there was four or five

02:09:50.460 --> 02:10:02.020
different people involved in this selling property, two port, three port portfolio LLC.

02:10:02.020 --> 02:10:12.819
and so on and so forth, but not just one, at least five, and the Freeport Portfolio acts

02:10:12.819 --> 02:10:19.380
the Pied Piper, which we all know about the Pied Piper, and there's nothing good about

02:10:19.380 --> 02:10:27.859
the Pied Piper to manage their property, but what you may not know is that Freeport Portfolio,

02:10:27.859 --> 02:10:39.479
LLLC and Pied Piper are the same people. They're two in one. And they have came to our city

02:10:40.680 --> 02:10:47.239
and have played our mayor and our city managers as suckers. And they're running a muck

02:10:47.960 --> 02:10:56.039
on our city. And in case you don't know what a muck is, it's a scam. And so we have to do something.

02:10:56.039 --> 02:11:07.039
Johnson. No one has the right. I feel you should feel, City Manager Boyer, City Mayor,

02:11:07.039 --> 02:11:16.600
that anybody can come in our city and do this to us. And so my expectations of both of you

02:11:16.600 --> 02:11:24.199
are great. I don't want to know what we can't do. I want to focus on what we can do for

02:11:24.199 --> 02:11:25.960
for our constituents.

02:11:25.960 --> 02:11:27.039
I have a question.

02:11:27.039 --> 02:11:30.479
Can you tell me what you were accusing the manager and I of doing because I kind of didn't

02:11:30.479 --> 02:11:32.640
understand that.

02:11:32.640 --> 02:11:36.319
I didn't accuse you and the manager of anything.

02:11:36.319 --> 02:11:44.039
I said you all have allowed people to come into our city and play you like suckers.

02:11:44.039 --> 02:11:46.640
It's what I said.

02:11:46.640 --> 02:11:52.579
You do realize that we don't have authority on whether someone can purchase something.

02:11:52.579 --> 02:11:56.779
it's not about purchasing so so with all this discussion what are you proposing

02:11:56.779 --> 02:12:08.380
that we do you tell me what can you do I mean you can't take a property and charge

02:12:08.380 --> 02:12:15.779
twelve and fifteen hundred dollars in a five six hundred dollar neighborhood

02:12:15.779 --> 02:12:23.930
and I. I could not have done it without you. You can't even fix the roof on your house.

02:12:23.930 --> 02:12:29.930
That's like going to the Eastside where you ought to have said only 10% or 50% of what

02:12:29.930 --> 02:12:37.930
the property over there are worth. You can't even fix the roof on your house. But then

02:12:37.930 --> 02:12:46.369
somebody can come in and say, oh, I'm going to charge $1,200 for rent. Bullcrap. It has

02:12:46.369 --> 02:12:47.369
Huffines.

02:12:47.369 --> 02:12:55.850
All of these rental agreements fit the area where they're located.

02:12:55.850 --> 02:13:02.050
And I want to tell every renter out there, get an inspection.

02:13:02.050 --> 02:13:05.609
You as a renter have rights.

02:13:05.609 --> 02:13:08.170
Know your rights.

02:13:08.170 --> 02:13:11.289
There used to be books out there that said renter rights.

02:13:11.289 --> 02:13:12.289
I don't know.

02:13:12.289 --> 02:13:16.029
Greater Freeport Partnership, do you all have something like that?

02:13:16.029 --> 02:13:18.109
Who have something like that?

02:13:18.109 --> 02:13:22.710
that the renters can go and know what their rights are.

02:13:22.710 --> 02:13:26.670
Okay, so again, this presentation about the city's role.

02:13:26.670 --> 02:13:31.670
So again, we cannot put on a cap on anyone's rent.

02:13:31.670 --> 02:13:32.550
We can't do that.

02:13:32.550 --> 02:13:33.630
So what are you proposing?

02:13:33.630 --> 02:13:35.149
And that's not what I'm asking you to do.

02:13:35.149 --> 02:13:36.149
So what are you proposing?

02:13:36.149 --> 02:13:40.470
Cause that's, you're trying to blur the lines

02:13:40.470 --> 02:13:42.229
of what the city's role is.

02:13:43.189 --> 02:13:45.989
So if you have something to propose, let's talk about it.

02:13:45.989 --> 02:13:56.989
I do. Alderman Simmons? Alderman Stacy has yielded. Alderman Stacy, are you done? Yes.

02:13:56.989 --> 02:14:07.989
Alright. So I propose that we as a city develop and create our own homeless shelter because FACC is filled to the brim and can't take anymore.

02:14:07.989 --> 02:14:13.989
We have no rent cap. We can't do anything about that. But what we can do is prepare for the fallout.

02:14:13.989 --> 02:14:46.479
What is it you're proposing? I didn't catch that. Homeless shelter. No, I don't think that's a bad idea. I think with budget seizing coming up, I think Alderperson Simmons would be a good idea if you brought together a plan, a staff, what it would cost, maybe, you know, some developers or maybe an RFP we could put out for that and get some general ideas of the cost for that. But it would definitely have to be something that the city would budget for. Definitely worth an investigation and, you know, come

02:14:46.479 --> 02:14:47.479
and the other.

02:14:47.479 --> 02:14:49.859
So I think there's a lot to be said about the

02:14:49.859 --> 02:14:50.859
process of making a proposal to council.

02:14:50.859 --> 02:14:51.859
I think the council should be able to come up with

02:14:51.859 --> 02:14:52.859
some numbers and what it would cost.

02:14:52.859 --> 02:14:53.859
Olin Sanders, your second time.

02:14:53.859 --> 02:14:57.859
Yeah, I like what you just said and to table that

02:14:57.859 --> 02:15:04.479
with the fact of making a proposal to council,

02:15:04.479 --> 02:15:10.100
knowing that this is a priority one kind of thing

02:15:10.100 --> 02:15:12.699
going on with the citizens of Freeport.

02:15:12.699 --> 02:15:17.119
And I don't think there's no one wants to see

02:15:17.119 --> 02:15:24.060
Anyone, and homeless shelters at all, but what I'm proposing is that we get together

02:15:24.060 --> 02:15:32.520
as council, have a planning discussion to have to see if we can all be on the same page.

02:15:32.520 --> 02:15:40.239
If there's something that council can look into and then consult with the city council

02:15:40.239 --> 02:15:58.319
Duckman, I think we should have a roundtable of some sort just to talk about this issue.

02:15:58.319 --> 02:16:05.699
This is an issue that is not going to go away and people will be suffering if nothing happens

02:16:05.699 --> 02:16:06.699
Huffines.

02:16:06.699 --> 02:16:14.699
If we could do anything, come up with any kind of a proposal, suggestion, recommendations

02:16:14.699 --> 02:16:20.979
and things of this nature, if there's any governmental programs or grants that could

02:16:20.979 --> 02:16:24.500
be implemented into whatever we're discussing.

02:16:24.500 --> 02:16:29.260
Those things need to be brought out on the table and I feel like this, we're not getting

02:16:29.260 --> 02:16:30.260
Huffines.

02:16:30.260 --> 02:16:35.940
We're not getting enough information from our council members talking about these subject

02:16:35.940 --> 02:16:36.940
matters.

02:16:36.940 --> 02:16:39.020
It's almost like we went into silent mode.

02:16:39.020 --> 02:16:46.459
But anyway, this is what we need to start doing, opening up to the citizens of Freeport.

02:16:46.459 --> 02:16:47.459
Yep.

02:16:47.459 --> 02:16:48.459
I'm sorry.

02:16:48.459 --> 02:16:51.979
And I would welcome you to have that discussion with city manager at your next meeting.

02:16:51.979 --> 02:16:52.979
Yeah.

02:16:52.979 --> 02:16:53.979
Yeah.

02:16:53.979 --> 02:16:54.979
That sounds good.

02:16:54.979 --> 02:16:55.979
We can make that happen.

02:16:55.979 --> 02:16:58.979
Is there any other discussion on the city's role?

02:16:58.979 --> 02:17:10.340
Alderman Klemm? Sure. Last week Alderman Stacey and I attended a meeting that was

02:17:10.340 --> 02:17:16.260
put together by Josh Atkinson. It was a meeting that brought up some of the issues

02:17:16.260 --> 02:17:24.500
that were out there due to the recent purchase of the Chapman property, okay.

02:17:24.500 --> 02:17:38.020
and I have had some long discussions on this. One thing we've got to realize is that there's

02:17:38.020 --> 02:17:45.459
two sides to this whole project, okay? If we take, and one of the things is that Reverend

02:17:45.459 --> 02:17:51.299
Dye's got her sign up out here that says we should extend it to 60 days. You know, that

02:17:51.299 --> 02:17:52.299
Miller.

02:17:52.299 --> 02:17:58.819
The flip side of that, if I'm a landlord, when you move into my house, now I'm not

02:17:58.819 --> 02:18:03.139
going to ask you for one month or two months, I'm going to ask you for three or four months

02:18:03.139 --> 02:18:05.979
because when you're going to leave in the last couple months, you're not going to pay

02:18:05.979 --> 02:18:10.899
your rent and you're going to be gone.

02:18:10.899 --> 02:18:16.299
The landlord's also in this, and I'm not defending the landlord's 100%.

02:18:16.299 --> 02:18:24.139
I believe what brought up here is Pied Piper bought this, okay. Keep in mind over the last, which

02:18:24.139 --> 02:18:32.540
Stacy started to mention, over the last number of months or the last couple years, we've had property

02:18:32.540 --> 02:18:39.420
bought up by two or three different outfits, not just one. We used to have a good

02:18:39.420 --> 02:18:49.819
Good home-based landlord tenant situation that was owned by people from town, you know,

02:18:49.819 --> 02:18:55.979
now we're getting more from out of town, okay, but we haven't heard from Pied Piper, you

02:18:55.979 --> 02:19:01.780
know, their intention may to be to do something to these properties, but when we put the numbers

02:19:01.780 --> 02:19:07.459
of properties up there, they were far different than what came out at the first meeting, you

02:19:07.459 --> 02:19:09.819
you know, we were talking 300 properties

02:19:09.819 --> 02:19:12.540
and then when you boil it down to there were two,

02:19:12.540 --> 02:19:15.940
three different kinds of properties that Chapman had

02:19:15.940 --> 02:19:19.340
that we all got to look at differently, you know?

02:19:19.340 --> 02:19:24.340
So I believe anything that we can do in the long run

02:19:24.459 --> 02:19:29.379
to help any renters or help with the landlords or renters

02:19:29.379 --> 02:19:32.680
that we can work out some things that we need to change.

02:19:32.680 --> 02:19:33.000
Fowler.

02:19:33.000 --> 02:19:37.000
It's beneficial to all of us, okay?

02:19:37.000 --> 02:19:43.600
If we take and do something that's going to completely raise everybody's rate, we've

02:19:43.600 --> 02:19:49.479
done nothing to help anybody, and I think that's the long-distance end on this thing,

02:19:49.479 --> 02:19:51.680
and costs and everything else are going up.

02:19:51.680 --> 02:19:58.879
As we talk about the difference of months, how much deposit and all that goes up, as

02:19:58.879 --> 02:20:02.219
and the taxes go up, all that enters into the situation

02:20:02.219 --> 02:20:05.379
and all that stuff enters into the rent of it.

02:20:05.379 --> 02:20:08.420
As far as the rent, I have to tell you this,

02:20:08.420 --> 02:20:11.700
I had a house of my mother's that we rented out

02:20:11.700 --> 02:20:15.479
for a number of years, I rented it out in 1997

02:20:15.479 --> 02:20:18.459
for 600 and some bucks and it was a two bedroom,

02:20:18.459 --> 02:20:21.719
one bath house in a nice neighborhood.

02:20:21.719 --> 02:20:25.280
So the rents have been there years ago

02:20:25.280 --> 02:20:29.559
and maybe these have not kept up with the times.

02:20:29.559 --> 02:20:32.319
But those are the discussions we need to have

02:20:32.319 --> 02:20:34.559
and how we can help anybody involved.

02:20:34.559 --> 02:20:35.920
Right on, right on.

02:20:35.920 --> 02:20:36.760
That's right on.

02:20:36.760 --> 02:20:39.000
Was there other discussion on the city's role?

02:20:39.000 --> 02:20:39.879
Alderman Johnson?

02:20:41.040 --> 02:20:44.639
If we change some ordinances right now,

02:20:44.639 --> 02:20:46.959
like say we change it and say,

02:20:46.959 --> 02:20:50.379
okay, you got to give them 60 days notice,

02:20:51.459 --> 02:20:54.180
that would not affect what's happening right now,

02:20:54.180 --> 02:20:56.780
but would affect the future, is that correct

02:20:56.780 --> 02:20:58.340
or am I wrong on that?

02:20:58.340 --> 02:20:59.799
It would affect leases entered into

02:20:59.799 --> 02:21:01.459
after the effective date of the ordinance.

02:21:01.459 --> 02:21:04.379
After the effective date of the ordinance, okay.

02:21:04.379 --> 02:21:07.700
And also is it, would it be legal

02:21:07.700 --> 02:21:10.379
for the city to put in some kind of ordinance

02:21:10.379 --> 02:21:14.780
that said a house or a property could not,

02:21:14.780 --> 02:21:17.819
a renter house or property could not be sold

02:21:17.819 --> 02:21:21.860
unless it passes an inspection saying that it's up to code.

02:21:21.860 --> 02:21:24.340
would that be something legal that could be done?

02:21:24.340 --> 02:21:26.180
I don't know, I'm just asking.

02:21:27.379 --> 02:21:30.620
I can tell you and Alderman Klemm may be able to speak

02:21:30.620 --> 02:21:32.579
to this a bit as well.

02:21:32.579 --> 02:21:34.500
That was approached many years ago.

02:21:34.500 --> 02:21:35.340
Okay.

02:21:36.340 --> 02:21:40.659
And that was, it was determined not to do that.

02:21:43.159 --> 02:21:46.020
And that was the political will at the time.

02:21:46.020 --> 02:21:48.340
Can certainly be explored again.

02:21:48.340 --> 02:21:50.979
I'll tell you the pushback and again,

02:21:50.979 --> 02:21:53.200
I'm a little bit out of my territory here.

02:21:53.200 --> 02:21:55.860
This is just, again, historical knowledge.

02:21:55.860 --> 02:21:58.559
The argument would be that, well,

02:21:58.559 --> 02:22:04.120
if as soon as a property has to be brought up

02:22:04.120 --> 02:22:07.299
to current standards to code,

02:22:08.479 --> 02:22:11.879
and not just grandfathered in as existing,

02:22:11.879 --> 02:22:15.360
and I'm sure Wayne can tell you

02:22:15.360 --> 02:22:17.239
that there's a difference between IPMC

02:22:17.239 --> 02:22:20.020
and then current building codes and that sort of thing.

02:22:20.020 --> 02:22:50.020
if it gets beyond a standard maintenance code for the era in which the house was built it's prohibitively expensive to upgrade that now that that's there's certainly something to be said for doing that in that all housing then eventually will come up to current standards but that doesn't come out and come without a price so what happens is we greatly increase the cost to sell something or specifically

02:22:50.020 --> 02:22:51.020
and DePriest.

02:22:51.020 --> 02:22:53.020
I think that's a good way to really drive down the price of property.

02:22:53.020 --> 02:22:56.700
If I'm a seller, the buyer is going to pay me less because they know they're going to

02:22:56.700 --> 02:22:59.219
need to do a bunch of work.

02:22:59.219 --> 02:23:00.819
Oldham and Sellers?

02:23:00.819 --> 02:23:01.819
Yes.

02:23:01.819 --> 02:23:08.780
I mean, I think that with the city, I think with this situation, I can understand long-term,

02:23:08.780 --> 02:23:13.780
well if you're in a long-term lease, you got until your lease is over with.

02:23:13.780 --> 02:23:18.299
So you still have time to move.

02:23:18.299 --> 02:23:25.540
But if there's a situation where it's month to month, I can't see the 60 day notice thing

02:23:25.540 --> 02:23:27.819
because you're doing it month to month.

02:23:27.819 --> 02:23:40.340
And then we also have the situation where people were in the program of buying on contract.

02:23:40.340 --> 02:23:45.700
Once you buy on contract, that's not anything with the city.

02:23:45.700 --> 02:23:49.139
because if you're buying on contract and you're under that,

02:23:49.139 --> 02:23:52.340
that's on you and you have to deal with that.

02:23:52.340 --> 02:23:57.340
So I can understand the 60 day notice

02:23:57.340 --> 02:24:01.399
on people whose contract is getting ready to end

02:24:01.399 --> 02:24:05.000
within the next six months or something like that.

02:24:05.000 --> 02:24:06.979
I can go along with that, but if you still,

02:24:06.979 --> 02:24:08.940
if you signed your lease in May

02:24:08.940 --> 02:24:12.159
and you've got way till May, it doesn't apply.

02:24:12.159 --> 02:24:15.180
And I think that not having the 60 day

02:24:15.180 --> 02:24:18.299
be a ordinance for everybody

02:24:18.299 --> 02:24:20.579
because there are good landlords out there

02:24:20.579 --> 02:24:22.659
that are doing what they're supposed to do

02:24:22.659 --> 02:24:24.260
and handling their business.

02:24:24.260 --> 02:24:28.899
And they're already having problems with 30 days,

02:24:28.899 --> 02:24:30.219
trying to get people out.

02:24:30.219 --> 02:24:32.700
So I can understand with this situation

02:24:32.700 --> 02:24:36.239
and under this contract, we do the 60 day notice,

02:24:36.239 --> 02:24:38.559
but I just can't see it going across the board

02:24:38.559 --> 02:24:41.579
because that hurts landlords that are out there

02:24:41.579 --> 02:24:43.059
doing what they're supposed to do

02:24:43.059 --> 02:24:44.819
and trying to handle their business.

02:24:44.819 --> 02:24:48.020
so that's what I think we.

02:24:48.020 --> 02:24:49.260
Oh, Ms. Stacey.

02:24:49.260 --> 02:24:54.309
Well, we have been asked of the constituents,

02:24:54.309 --> 02:24:56.229
the renters that's going through this

02:24:57.750 --> 02:25:02.750
is that for less than three years to 60 days,

02:25:02.950 --> 02:25:06.709
for three years or more, 120 days

02:25:06.709 --> 02:25:09.909
and I checked surrounding areas

02:25:09.909 --> 02:25:11.709
and in surrounding areas,

02:25:11.709 --> 02:25:14.950
it's already in place on their ordinance

02:25:14.950 --> 02:25:17.469
so I know this is something we can do.

02:25:18.829 --> 02:25:23.829
And I understand Attorney Cox, what you said,

02:25:24.409 --> 02:25:28.850
did not fly, I don't know how many years ago.

02:25:28.850 --> 02:25:30.950
This is a new season.

02:25:30.950 --> 02:25:33.229
This is a new breed of people.

02:25:33.229 --> 02:25:42.000
We have got to do something for these people

02:25:44.559 --> 02:25:51.170
and for ourselves.

02:25:51.170 --> 02:26:21.170
I just say I also recommend that anybody who sees an issue with their apartment to please come in and fill out we have them sitting on the desk today we always have them at the front desk if there's any issue with a place that you're renting to please come in we do require that you sign you know permission for us to access the property that's for the city's liability to ensure that if the landlord comes in and said that we were trespassing we always have a right to enter so before we will enter the city will enter a property

02:26:21.170 --> 02:26:51.170
we do require that you give us the written permission and staff always we always look forward to helping in any way we can and if there are any issues we will once this is filled out we will certainly go in and investigate the property and hold that landlord accountable for any violations that they have so that's something I just want to echo and hope that our community takes advantage of that if they feel that there's something in the building that is improper so

02:26:51.170 --> 02:26:53.729
but that is important to know that you do have to,

02:26:54.690 --> 02:26:56.950
you do have to fill this out first.

02:26:56.950 --> 02:27:01.950
I would like to make a motion that we as a council,

02:27:02.850 --> 02:27:07.850
as the mayor, as city manager and as attorney Cox,

02:27:09.149 --> 02:27:14.149
sit down and discuss not what we can't do

02:27:15.969 --> 02:27:20.569
but what we can do so that everybody can have

02:27:21.170 --> 02:27:22.170
Fowler.

02:27:22.170 --> 02:27:25.250
The same knowledge and an understanding.

02:27:25.250 --> 02:27:26.489
We don't need a motion for that.

02:27:26.489 --> 02:27:28.850
If you want to come in and talk about your ideas, you're welcome to.

02:27:28.850 --> 02:27:36.170
I want us to get together as a whole, not one-on-one, not you and Boyer and me.

02:27:36.170 --> 02:27:38.889
You and Boyer and Shadle.

02:27:38.889 --> 02:27:43.010
You and Boyer, us as a council.

02:27:43.010 --> 02:27:45.450
Wouldn't that be a violation of the Open Meetings Act?

02:27:45.450 --> 02:27:48.690
No, not if we make it public and put it out there.

02:27:48.690 --> 02:27:53.229
We need to talk.

02:27:53.229 --> 02:27:55.389
what would that be a special city council meeting?

02:27:55.389 --> 02:27:58.229
Yeah, I think what's being suggested is a special meeting.

02:27:58.229 --> 02:28:00.790
We call a special meeting any other time.

02:28:00.790 --> 02:28:05.209
We've had special meetings.

02:28:05.209 --> 02:28:10.069
Okay, so what are you, what exactly is your motion?

02:28:11.190 --> 02:28:16.190
That we call a special meeting with you, Boyer,

02:28:16.549 --> 02:28:19.670
Attorney Cox, and the eight aldermen.

02:28:20.790 --> 02:28:22.250
And of course you, Dovie.

02:28:23.149 --> 02:28:24.989
Is there a second to that?

02:28:24.989 --> 02:28:26.709
Yeah, I second that.

02:28:26.709 --> 02:28:28.829
We have a motion on the floor made by Alderman Stacey,

02:28:28.829 --> 02:28:31.469
seconded by Alderman Sanders to call a special meeting

02:28:33.389 --> 02:28:35.290
as stated with those involved.

02:28:36.270 --> 02:28:39.110
Madam Clerk, would you please take the role on that?

02:28:39.110 --> 02:28:39.950
Shadle.

02:28:39.950 --> 02:28:42.190
Oh, okay, you wanna have a discussion

02:28:42.190 --> 02:28:43.709
on the special meeting?

02:28:43.709 --> 02:28:45.110
Yeah, no, well.

02:28:45.110 --> 02:28:45.950
No.

02:28:45.950 --> 02:28:46.950
That's what's on the table right now,

02:28:46.950 --> 02:28:47.829
is the special meeting.

02:28:47.829 --> 02:28:48.670
Okay.

02:28:51.510 --> 02:28:53.030
Shadle, did you wanna talk about the special meeting?

02:28:53.030 --> 02:28:59.110
We just wondered when we were thinking about doing this to see whether it fits schedules

02:28:59.110 --> 02:29:06.549
or how we're going to coordinate all this.

02:29:06.549 --> 02:29:08.110
We have two meetings next week.

02:29:08.110 --> 02:29:11.829
We're in the season of beginning our financial cows.

02:29:11.829 --> 02:29:12.829
We'll just call it.

02:29:12.829 --> 02:29:16.430
We'll let Dovie just call it.

02:29:16.430 --> 02:29:17.430
So Steve?

02:29:17.430 --> 02:29:24.110
Well, if I may, that sounds like potentially a setting on the committee of the whole.

02:29:24.110 --> 02:29:26.709
I mean, that's for a discussion.

02:29:26.709 --> 02:29:31.989
So setting aside a segment of time on the agenda in the

02:29:31.989 --> 02:30:00.000
We can have that discussion. I think that, I mean, if there's a special meeting for that on a different night, it's just another, it's just another city council meeting for discussion. So if, if I can throw that out as a suggestion, if it goes on the cow, that- So as a discussion item that Alderman Stacy could put on for the next cow, if she wanted to, is what you're saying?

02:30:00.000 --> 02:30:01.000
Johnson.

02:30:01.000 --> 02:30:16.639
I was just wondering if possibly we could, each one of us could write down the things

02:30:16.639 --> 02:30:22.159
that we are thinking possibly that could be included in the ordinance to help, you know,

02:30:22.159 --> 02:30:28.000
the tenants as well as the landlords, I mean, there's two sides to every story here.

02:30:28.000 --> 02:30:31.739
to improve the housing in the city of Freeport

02:30:31.739 --> 02:30:34.020
if we could write down some of those things

02:30:34.020 --> 02:30:36.219
that we could present them to you ahead of time

02:30:36.219 --> 02:30:38.620
so we would know whether they were legal things

02:30:38.620 --> 02:30:39.659
that we could do or not do

02:30:39.659 --> 02:30:41.559
and then maybe go from there with that.

02:30:43.459 --> 02:30:46.700
Certainly any question that I can research ahead of time,

02:30:46.700 --> 02:30:47.620
I appreciate.

02:30:47.620 --> 02:30:48.459
Right.

02:30:50.459 --> 02:30:53.139
If anybody ever wants to send any questions my way,

02:30:53.139 --> 02:30:54.819
I'm happy to take a look at them

02:30:54.819 --> 02:30:56.899
and I can hopefully be a little better prepared

02:30:56.899 --> 02:30:57.899
and Stacey.

02:30:57.899 --> 02:31:00.020
Okay, so back to what's on the table.

02:31:00.020 --> 02:31:04.659
Is a special meeting versus a COW Alderman Stacy, do you have a preference on that?

02:31:04.659 --> 02:31:10.530
I would like a special meeting.

02:31:10.530 --> 02:31:17.200
Do you want to propose a date and a time?

02:31:17.200 --> 02:31:41.049
Well, I guess if I have to, Thursday the 4th at 4 o'clock.

02:31:41.049 --> 02:31:43.370
I'm sorry, I would not be able to make that meeting.

02:31:43.370 --> 02:31:44.809
I already have something.

02:31:44.809 --> 02:31:46.649
What would work in your schedule?

02:31:46.649 --> 02:31:47.649
Go ahead.

02:31:47.649 --> 02:31:49.129
No, what would work in your schedule?

02:31:49.129 --> 02:31:50.129
And that's not enough time to put in?

02:31:50.129 --> 02:31:54.129
Yeah, it has to be at least 48 hours, ma'am.

02:31:54.129 --> 02:31:57.090
Let's make it two weeks from now.

02:31:57.090 --> 02:31:58.290
Sorry, this is the business.

02:31:58.290 --> 02:32:00.010
Yeah, let's make it two weeks from now.

02:32:00.010 --> 02:32:03.170
Do we know what's on the COW for next week?

02:32:03.170 --> 02:32:03.969
Is it full?

02:32:03.969 --> 02:32:07.290
There's going to be discussion on the COW.

02:32:07.290 --> 02:32:11.329
There's going to be discussion on the COW about this matter.

02:32:11.329 --> 02:32:13.969
But that's not what I'm asking.

02:32:13.969 --> 02:32:16.290
I'm asking for a special meeting.

02:32:16.290 --> 02:32:19.010
I don't care if it's Wednesday the 17th.

02:32:19.010 --> 02:32:21.930
I'm just asking for a special meeting.

02:32:21.930 --> 02:32:26.930
Well, yeah, let's convert that Council COW meeting

02:32:26.969 --> 02:32:29.010
into this special meeting.

02:32:29.010 --> 02:32:31.850
And so that way- No, they're two separate things.

02:32:31.850 --> 02:32:35.610
No, what I'm getting at is the fact that we use all the time

02:32:35.610 --> 02:32:39.049
that we would normally use in the COW

02:32:39.049 --> 02:32:40.450
for this special meeting,

02:32:40.450 --> 02:32:45.450
and now our attention will be prioritized

02:32:45.450 --> 02:32:49.930
to this special meeting as opposed of the COW.

02:32:49.930 --> 02:32:53.209
It's a COW-like thing, but we're gonna convert it

02:32:53.209 --> 02:32:55.930
into a special meeting.

02:32:55.930 --> 02:32:59.729
And then that way, we don't have to bring another agenda

02:32:59.729 --> 02:33:02.530
for the COW just for the primary reason

02:33:02.530 --> 02:33:04.829
why we're bringing a special meeting.

02:33:06.610 --> 02:33:08.569
Or an additional date or an additional time.

02:33:08.569 --> 02:33:10.610
In this place, yeah.

02:33:10.610 --> 02:33:14.329
Six o'clock on the COW,

02:33:14.329 --> 02:33:20.409
6 o'clock until its duration until we have finalized that and then all of the

02:33:20.409 --> 02:33:26.770
information that we come to will be distributed to the public. The public can

02:33:26.770 --> 02:33:32.809
come to the website, see what went on in the discussion, and what we came

02:33:32.809 --> 02:33:38.850
up with. So you want to put an agenda item on the COW? To discuss what you're saying.

02:33:38.850 --> 02:33:48.290
Is it going to be, is the special meeting going to be the COW?

02:33:48.290 --> 02:33:50.610
That's what he's saying.

02:33:50.610 --> 02:33:54.610
I know that's what you're saying, but what do you say, Madam Mayor?

02:33:54.610 --> 02:33:55.610
I agree.

02:33:55.610 --> 02:33:56.610
I don't think we need to have another time.

02:33:56.610 --> 02:33:57.610
What do you say, City Manager Boyer?

02:33:57.610 --> 02:34:02.489
I don't want us to say this is going to be a special meeting on the COW and then we have

02:34:02.489 --> 02:34:05.450
15 other items that needs discussed.

02:34:05.450 --> 02:34:09.450
We still have agenda items on the COW, but it can be an additional point.

02:34:16.040 --> 02:34:23.600
Okay, so I'm confused on what we're having for a motion. Are we putting it on the COW or are we

02:34:24.159 --> 02:34:26.719
picking a date? Because we're never going to agree on a date.

02:34:28.159 --> 02:34:33.840
So as of right now, the motion is just to have a special meeting to discuss this topic.

02:34:34.559 --> 02:34:41.680
There, I think, no, no, her motion was just to have a special meeting to talk about this topic.

02:34:41.680 --> 02:34:51.600
Okay. Now, part and parcel of that, it probably wouldn't make sense if we're going to have a special meeting to then pick a date so that we know whether or not people can be here or not for it.

02:34:52.200 --> 02:35:07.840
Alternatively, it's been discussed, well, rather than call a special meeting, do we want to just make this an agenda item on one of the upcoming cows instead? But that's not on the table. The only thing that's on the table right now is Alderman Stacey's motion to have a special meeting.

02:35:07.840 --> 02:35:19.840
Yeah, they would turn out to be the same. It doesn't change very much if it's a COW or if it's a special meeting is what I've been trying to say.

02:35:19.840 --> 02:35:26.840
So I think that what's critical right now is ultimately, Alderman Stacey, this is your motion that's on the floor right now.

02:35:26.840 --> 02:35:32.840
So it's up to you. Do you want to keep it as a special meeting? In which case then I would suggest that we need to find a date.

02:35:32.840 --> 02:35:40.840
Or are you willing to amend your motion or withdraw your motion and a new motion be made to just make this an agenda item on an upcoming COW?

02:35:40.840 --> 02:35:55.579
But it wouldn't be exclusive. It wouldn't be this topic is the only agenda item on the COW because we have our COW coming up has other agenda stuff on it already.

02:35:55.579 --> 02:35:56.579
Alderman Stacey?

02:35:56.579 --> 02:35:58.579
I withdraw my motion.

02:35:58.579 --> 02:36:01.579
Alderman Sanders, will you remove your second?

02:36:01.579 --> 02:36:02.579
Yes.

02:36:02.579 --> 02:36:10.579
Okay so now back to again the presentation was about the city's rule.

02:36:10.579 --> 02:36:22.879
Make your motion Larry. Why am I making a motion? You wanted it at the COW. No, no

02:36:22.879 --> 02:36:32.219
Cecelia don't confuse what was being said. You wanted a special meeting. If it

02:36:32.219 --> 02:36:39.040
that lands on the COW, we'll just use your special meeting on the COW.

02:36:39.040 --> 02:36:41.600
That was the present, that's what I was presenting.

02:36:41.600 --> 02:36:47.920
So doesn't matter how we use the COW, long as your special meeting was implemented or

02:36:47.920 --> 02:36:54.120
inserted into the COW so we can just talk about that issue only.

02:36:54.120 --> 02:37:01.079
But I'm understanding what Attorney Zito is saying that there will be special things,

02:37:01.079 --> 02:37:05.100
on the agenda, additional items on the agenda,

02:37:05.100 --> 02:37:09.780
if we have a COW saying that your special meeting

02:37:09.780 --> 02:37:13.180
is not gonna be the only thing that's at the COW.

02:37:13.180 --> 02:37:15.340
Is that what I'm understanding?

02:37:15.340 --> 02:37:17.899
And I don't want it, because it gets confusing

02:37:17.899 --> 02:37:20.020
when you say that you have a special meeting

02:37:20.020 --> 02:37:20.840
during the COW.

02:37:20.840 --> 02:37:23.579
You can't have a special meeting during the COW.

02:37:23.579 --> 02:37:24.559
You're either at a COW meeting

02:37:24.559 --> 02:37:25.959
or you're having a special meeting

02:37:25.959 --> 02:37:27.440
or you have a regular council meeting.

02:37:27.440 --> 02:37:29.340
But you can have an agenda item

02:37:29.340 --> 02:37:35.299
and what you want to talk about, this issue here, you can make that an agenda item on

02:37:35.299 --> 02:37:36.299
the COW.

02:37:36.299 --> 02:37:38.899
There would just be other, our normal other agenda items that have already been scheduled

02:37:38.899 --> 02:37:39.899
for.

02:37:39.899 --> 02:37:40.899
And you don't need to make a motion for that.

02:37:40.899 --> 02:37:41.899
You can.

02:37:41.899 --> 02:37:42.899
Two other people can just add.

02:37:42.899 --> 02:37:46.739
We just won't have a COW the next time that we meet.

02:37:46.739 --> 02:37:47.739
No.

02:37:47.739 --> 02:37:48.739
Next week it's a COW.

02:37:48.739 --> 02:37:51.739
Oh, is that right?

02:37:51.739 --> 02:37:53.440
Yeah, that's right.

02:37:53.440 --> 02:37:58.500
So if you'd like to add it to the agenda for next Monday, you and another alderman are

02:37:58.500 --> 02:38:01.700
are welcome to do that, you don't need a motion for it.

02:38:01.700 --> 02:38:03.000
I know that Mayor.

02:38:08.850 --> 02:38:13.690
Okay, so are we ready to move on to item number 18, which?

02:38:13.690 --> 02:38:14.530
Madam Mayor.

02:38:14.530 --> 02:38:16.129
We still haven't concluded.

02:38:17.489 --> 02:38:18.389
Director Duckman.

02:38:19.569 --> 02:38:22.229
Yeah, we haven't concluded on what direction

02:38:22.229 --> 02:38:24.170
we're gonna go with this.

02:38:24.170 --> 02:38:27.930
So, Stacy, do you wanna continue

02:38:27.930 --> 02:38:30.770
with your special meeting on next Monday?

02:38:30.770 --> 02:38:32.149
I removed it.

02:38:32.149 --> 02:38:34.149
She removed it, okay.

02:38:34.149 --> 02:38:35.909
Well, she removed it.

02:38:35.909 --> 02:38:39.229
Right, and again, you're welcome to put something on

02:38:39.229 --> 02:38:41.909
if that's what you want to do, but it'll be on the COW

02:38:41.909 --> 02:38:43.649
to include the other things.

02:38:43.649 --> 02:38:45.950
It's not one item COW.

02:38:45.950 --> 02:38:47.309
We've never had a one item COW.

02:38:47.309 --> 02:38:49.149
Yeah, yeah, you're right.

02:38:49.149 --> 02:38:51.149
Well, yeah, we just call it.

02:38:51.149 --> 02:38:52.469
So you can give some thought to it.

02:38:52.469 --> 02:38:55.549
We'll move on to the item number 18,

02:38:55.549 --> 02:38:58.309
which is discussion about rent increases

02:38:58.309 --> 02:39:01.590
by the Pied Piper group and the impact of the community.

02:39:01.590 --> 02:39:09.190
So I don't know if Alderman Stacy and Klemm, if you want to speak first, or if you want to give an opportunity for Pied Piper to just say a few things.

02:39:09.190 --> 02:39:11.190
It's your call.

02:39:11.190 --> 02:39:20.790
I'd appreciate it as long as Pied Piper is here, if they would speak of what their plans are and what are coming up, so we really know what we're talking about.

02:39:20.790 --> 02:39:23.190
Would you like to have the microphone for a few minutes, sir?

02:39:23.190 --> 02:39:24.190
Absolutely.

02:39:24.190 --> 02:39:26.920
Okay.

02:39:26.920 --> 02:39:27.920
Thank you for coming.

02:39:27.920 --> 02:39:28.920
Absolutely.

02:39:28.920 --> 02:39:29.920
What?

02:39:29.920 --> 02:39:32.000
Who is this guy?

02:39:32.000 --> 02:39:33.000
Piper?

02:39:33.000 --> 02:39:34.000
Yes.

02:39:34.000 --> 02:39:35.000
Who in the heck is Piper?

02:39:35.000 --> 02:39:39.309
Could you just state your name for the record, please?

02:39:39.309 --> 02:39:40.309
Moby Perack.

02:39:40.309 --> 02:39:47.819
That isn't what he said.

02:39:47.819 --> 02:39:48.819
Okay, go ahead.

02:39:48.819 --> 02:39:50.819
So it's my turn, right?

02:39:50.819 --> 02:39:51.819
Okay.

02:39:51.819 --> 02:39:55.819
First and foremost, thank you for having me here.

02:39:55.819 --> 02:40:00.579
And I would like to take this time to address the few concerns that are going around town

02:40:00.579 --> 02:40:06.020
about what the issue has been about rent increases.

02:40:06.020 --> 02:40:11.459
The idea here is that you cannot have two lemons in both

02:40:11.459 --> 02:40:14.500
of your hands and portray what you have to portray.

02:40:14.500 --> 02:40:15.979
You have to listen to both sides.

02:40:15.979 --> 02:40:16.979
What?

02:40:16.979 --> 02:40:21.979
So I basically sent out a notice to all the residents

02:40:21.979 --> 02:40:24.780
to let them know that I'd be coming to see them

02:40:24.780 --> 02:40:26.219
and have a conversation with them

02:40:26.219 --> 02:40:28.620
about their condition of the property

02:40:28.620 --> 02:40:30.079
and about meeting them in person.

02:40:30.959 --> 02:40:33.479
But when I went in person,

02:40:34.659 --> 02:40:36.360
I was able to address the question,

02:40:36.360 --> 02:40:38.159
let them know about the tenant benefit package,

02:40:38.159 --> 02:40:39.840
about what we're doing for them

02:40:39.840 --> 02:40:44.399
and about how the rent won't increase

02:40:44.399 --> 02:40:46.600
until the work has been done to the property.

02:40:47.959 --> 02:40:50.180
And there was home ownership offered

02:40:50.180 --> 02:40:51.459
and there was a lot of communication,

02:40:51.459 --> 02:40:53.000
a lot of promises were made with the tenants

02:40:53.000 --> 02:40:54.540
that were not portrayed correctly

02:40:54.540 --> 02:40:57.239
due to whatever apparent reasons.

02:40:57.239 --> 02:41:02.639
So the purpose I'm here is to address all these issues that

02:41:02.639 --> 02:41:05.159
are going on currently.

02:41:05.159 --> 02:41:08.559
I have not given anybody any 30-day notices.

02:41:08.559 --> 02:41:11.479
I have not given anybody eviction notices.

02:41:11.479 --> 02:41:13.959
I have not spoken to anybody about kicking them out

02:41:13.959 --> 02:41:15.920
of their homes.

02:41:15.920 --> 02:41:17.120
There are two ways, right?

02:41:17.120 --> 02:41:19.440
Either we could have come in right away,

02:41:19.440 --> 02:41:21.760
their rent will increase just because

02:41:21.760 --> 02:41:23.520
of the acquisition of the cost.

02:41:23.520 --> 02:41:25.959
Blindly increase the rent without knowing

02:41:25.959 --> 02:41:28.600
the people living in the property, who's living there?

02:41:28.600 --> 02:41:31.639
Their pets, their people, whoever that is, right?

02:41:31.639 --> 02:41:34.000
And cost increase, and you guys will still be here

02:41:34.000 --> 02:41:37.440
creating a chaos saying that, hey, how can Pied Pepper

02:41:37.440 --> 02:41:40.879
come in and increase the rent without meeting anybody

02:41:40.879 --> 02:41:42.920
in person, without knowing the condition of the property,

02:41:42.920 --> 02:41:45.920
without knowing the condition we're living in?

02:41:45.920 --> 02:41:48.840
But here you go, you guys are talking about inspection.

02:41:48.840 --> 02:41:51.520
Please, go ahead, go ahead, order the inspection.

02:41:51.520 --> 02:41:53.799
That's why I'm here talking to you in person,

02:41:53.799 --> 02:42:01.799
We're here understanding what the condition of the property is and understanding the condition of your situation of how much you're earning, how much you're making, if you're even eligible to make the payment or not.

02:42:01.799 --> 02:42:11.799
That's why I was in there, but you guys made a ruckus out of it, made a social media post out of it, and caused all sorts of rumors that didn't make sense.

02:42:11.799 --> 02:42:20.799
So prove to me what was the case for. Our goal here is to come improve every property that is here in Freeport, in our portfolio.

02:42:20.799 --> 02:42:24.000
made the condition better, living condition better, streets better, and

02:42:24.799 --> 02:42:30.000
make the, you know, community better. That's our whole idea. We want to fix this property.

02:42:30.200 --> 02:42:34.120
That's why we're here in person talking to you guys. Otherwise, why would we do that?

02:42:34.639 --> 02:42:40.639
That's the whole purpose. You have to fix all 320 units, all 225 properties. They all need work.

02:42:41.520 --> 02:42:48.360
The people that are living there are on month-to-month leases. I don't want to disrupt any landlord rules. It shouldn't be the case.

02:42:48.360 --> 02:42:55.340
I'm here telling you guys that what we're doing currently right now if you go to Piedpipergroup.com

02:42:55.340 --> 02:42:59.600
slash free board slash community you will be able to know everything about what we're trying to

02:42:59.600 --> 02:43:05.819
accomplish. Nobody at this moment is getting a rental increase until the work is done that is

02:43:05.819 --> 02:43:10.719
gonna be communicated. So I'm not sure where the ruckus is coming from but that is not the case.

02:43:10.719 --> 02:43:11.719
Huffines.

02:43:11.719 --> 02:43:16.280
If you have heard otherwise, well, that's on you guys.

02:43:16.280 --> 02:43:24.059
So are you standing there telling me you did not send out letters to all the month-to-month

02:43:24.059 --> 02:43:32.020
renters telling them that their rent was going to increase from $600 to $1200?

02:43:32.020 --> 02:43:33.020
I have not.

02:43:33.020 --> 02:43:34.020
They have letters.

02:43:34.020 --> 02:43:36.959
I have the letters, too.

02:43:36.959 --> 02:43:38.360
I wrote the letters.

02:43:38.360 --> 02:43:39.600
I made the letters.

02:43:39.600 --> 02:43:42.440
I sent the letters, I took the letters in person,

02:43:42.440 --> 02:43:44.840
spoke to them, showed them the market rent

02:43:44.840 --> 02:43:46.600
that is applicable for the condition

02:43:46.600 --> 02:43:48.120
that they should be living in,

02:43:48.120 --> 02:43:51.440
not the condition they're living in right now, not at all.

02:43:51.440 --> 02:43:53.620
Well, why then was,

02:43:55.760 --> 02:43:57.680
did you start calling all the ones

02:43:57.680 --> 02:44:01.319
you had put notices on their doors

02:44:01.319 --> 02:44:05.040
and telling them now that you recanted it,

02:44:05.040 --> 02:44:09.760
but you pulled it back and that they're not going up.

02:44:09.760 --> 02:44:12.440
No, not now, that's where you're at now.

02:44:12.440 --> 02:44:13.680
I'm not gonna pull anything back

02:44:13.680 --> 02:44:15.079
that I have not committed to, ma'am.

02:44:15.079 --> 02:44:16.959
I'm not gonna pull anything back that I have not committed to.

02:44:16.959 --> 02:44:18.200
I have not told them anything.

02:44:18.200 --> 02:44:21.219
I just told them, here I am, sitting in front of you,

02:44:21.219 --> 02:44:22.559
looking at the condition you're living in,

02:44:22.559 --> 02:44:25.200
which is horrendous, but here you are paying the rent

02:44:25.200 --> 02:44:27.239
that does not reflect the condition of the property.

02:44:27.239 --> 02:44:28.559
Freeport here does not want the condition of the property.

02:44:28.559 --> 02:44:32.479
Are you assessing renters?

02:44:32.479 --> 02:44:34.040
Larry, if you'd like to have it,

02:44:34.040 --> 02:44:37.719
you should let him finish and then I'll call on you, okay?

02:44:37.719 --> 02:44:44.610
So I can take all the questions once I'm done speaking.

02:44:44.610 --> 02:44:47.750
What I'm here to say is that once all those notices

02:44:47.750 --> 02:44:51.670
went out, when I went to visit 35 to 40 tenants

02:44:51.670 --> 02:44:54.790
into their homes, I met people with low income,

02:44:54.790 --> 02:44:57.670
I met people with good income, I met people with families

02:44:57.670 --> 02:44:59.670
that were concerned, I made sure I addressed

02:44:59.670 --> 02:45:02.430
all those concerns to understand the type of demographics

02:45:02.430 --> 02:45:03.989
that's living in the property.

02:45:03.989 --> 02:45:06.450
As a property manager, as a property management company,

02:45:06.450 --> 02:45:08.690
I don't know what you guys expect for them to do.

02:45:08.690 --> 02:45:11.209
You guys are smart individuals yourself.

02:45:11.209 --> 02:45:12.569
You become a rental owner.

02:45:12.569 --> 02:45:14.610
You would want to know who's living in your property,

02:45:14.610 --> 02:45:16.450
what the condition of the property is, right,

02:45:16.450 --> 02:45:18.250
and what the situation is so you can address it.

02:45:18.250 --> 02:45:19.809
It's a property.

02:45:19.809 --> 02:45:21.090
So here we are.

02:45:21.090 --> 02:45:22.850
We have all the situation.

02:45:22.850 --> 02:45:24.370
We have created a community page.

02:45:24.370 --> 02:45:26.250
We're going to be addressing all the questions, concerns,

02:45:26.250 --> 02:45:28.170
updates moving forward over there.

02:45:28.170 --> 02:45:30.610
Currently, there are no leases being signing

02:45:30.610 --> 02:45:31.729
for all the one-to-one tenants.

02:45:31.729 --> 02:45:34.569
What we're saying is, hey, if you like what you see,

02:45:34.569 --> 02:45:36.930
If you guys want to move forward, let's talk.

02:45:36.930 --> 02:45:39.569
Let's have a conversation, and let's address a situation

02:45:39.569 --> 02:45:41.250
where if you agree, we will make sure

02:45:41.250 --> 02:45:42.610
that we accommodate your request,

02:45:42.610 --> 02:45:44.049
move you into the property that makes sense,

02:45:44.049 --> 02:45:45.889
so we can fix the property.

02:45:45.889 --> 02:45:47.690
Address the condition, address the liability

02:45:47.690 --> 02:45:50.329
that as a landlord or as a property manager we have to take.

02:45:50.329 --> 02:45:51.489
And we work with them.

02:45:51.489 --> 02:45:53.510
If the people that are not able to afford their rents

02:45:53.510 --> 02:45:55.170
or they don't want to move forward,

02:45:55.170 --> 02:45:56.209
we will work with them.

02:45:56.209 --> 02:45:58.370
You don't need to do 60 days governance here.

02:45:58.370 --> 02:45:59.850
You guys are wasting all your time.

02:45:59.850 --> 02:46:02.610
We're saying we'll work with them to work three months,

02:46:02.610 --> 02:46:04.170
four months, five months, six months.

02:46:04.170 --> 02:46:05.170
Taylor.

02:46:05.170 --> 02:46:18.809
So, I don't know where anybody got any information from, how the speculation came about, but

02:46:18.809 --> 02:46:22.610
you can bring any person that I spoke to in person in front of me and let them tell me

02:46:22.610 --> 02:46:23.610
what I told them.

02:46:23.610 --> 02:46:26.610
That will not be the case.

02:46:26.610 --> 02:46:30.809
If that's what the case is, then I'm here to address it.

02:46:30.809 --> 02:46:31.809
Alderman Sanders?

02:46:31.809 --> 02:47:01.809
Yeah. In addition to what you're saying, I understand what you're going through. I just wanted to make sure that the renters or leasers are hearing you clearly, especially with the economic status, affordability, things of that nature. I like the fact that you do look at attendance income to determine whether or not this family can afford

02:47:01.809 --> 02:47:02.809
Huffines.

02:47:02.809 --> 02:47:09.329
This particular apartment, home, or whatever the case is, that is a plus, that's the plus

02:47:09.329 --> 02:47:16.610
thing that shows that you're doing due diligence to help any prospective renter or leaser,

02:47:16.610 --> 02:47:23.489
leasy, I should say, and to help them navigate through all of the things that they have to

02:47:23.489 --> 02:47:29.530
go through to afford one of the places that you have for rental or for sale that they

02:47:29.530 --> 02:47:32.129
they're able to be accommodated by

02:47:33.010 --> 02:47:37.250
whatever their economic structures is

02:47:37.250 --> 02:47:40.809
to afford that particular property.

02:47:40.809 --> 02:47:43.969
So yeah, I hear you saying that,

02:47:43.969 --> 02:47:47.069
I would agree with you that that is

02:47:47.069 --> 02:47:48.610
what should be put in place.

02:47:49.489 --> 02:47:53.010
People need to know this very clearly beforehand

02:47:55.129 --> 02:47:58.610
that these are what your requirements are

02:47:58.610 --> 02:47:59.489
and things like that.

02:47:59.489 --> 02:48:04.229
So I agree with you on how you're going about doing it.

02:48:05.690 --> 02:48:07.750
I don't know if you're making any promises

02:48:07.750 --> 02:48:10.129
or anything like that for sure.

02:48:10.129 --> 02:48:12.530
But the fact of the matter is that that information

02:48:12.530 --> 02:48:16.690
is available to any prospective tenant or renter

02:48:16.690 --> 02:48:19.610
that he will be able to work with you,

02:48:19.610 --> 02:48:22.889
talk with you, negotiate with you on your terms

02:48:22.889 --> 02:48:25.729
or any terms that you guys can agree with.

02:48:25.729 --> 02:48:29.649
I would love to see that that's going on.

02:48:29.649 --> 02:48:31.770
That's what you're conveying to us.

02:48:31.770 --> 02:48:34.809
You're conveying the fact that this is your strategy.

02:48:34.809 --> 02:48:37.209
This is what you guys are doing.

02:48:37.209 --> 02:48:42.209
That is what people need to see from another position.

02:48:43.569 --> 02:48:45.770
They need to know that you're doing that.

02:48:45.770 --> 02:48:48.049
And I like the fact that you are.

02:48:48.049 --> 02:48:51.489
You're saying that this, but like you said,

02:48:51.489 --> 02:48:54.729
information can be misled or information can be

02:48:55.729 --> 02:48:58.549
Brought Out Wrong and everybody has a different story.

02:48:58.549 --> 02:49:00.610
By the time it trickled down to the next runner,

02:49:00.610 --> 02:49:02.690
they got a whole different story.

02:49:02.690 --> 02:49:06.049
And so the whole thing about it is

02:49:06.049 --> 02:49:08.569
when they come to inquire about a house

02:49:08.569 --> 02:49:10.270
or an apartment or whatever the case is,

02:49:10.270 --> 02:49:12.889
you can just lay up and then find out

02:49:12.889 --> 02:49:14.569
what their circumstances are.

02:49:14.569 --> 02:49:17.649
Can they afford to rent anything from you?

02:49:17.649 --> 02:49:22.290
And then like you said, it cuts down the confusion.

02:49:22.290 --> 02:49:25.290
There's no misunderstandings and things like that.

02:49:25.290 --> 02:49:26.129
All right.

02:49:26.129 --> 02:49:27.549
So I agree with you.

02:49:27.549 --> 02:49:27.879
So I agree with you.

02:49:27.879 --> 02:49:28.879
Any other questions?

02:49:28.879 --> 02:49:30.959
Alderman Johnson.

02:49:30.959 --> 02:49:34.159
So currently you're stating that none of the rents

02:49:34.159 --> 02:49:36.920
are going to go up at this point.

02:49:36.920 --> 02:49:39.479
And the only time the rents will go up

02:49:39.479 --> 02:49:43.520
is after the homes are fixed.

02:49:43.520 --> 02:49:44.020
Correct.

02:49:44.020 --> 02:49:45.760
Is that what you're saying?

02:49:45.760 --> 02:49:47.200
OK.

02:49:47.200 --> 02:49:50.719
The other thing is the places that you

02:49:50.719 --> 02:49:54.719
are going to be fixing up, someone lives in them now.

02:49:54.719 --> 02:50:00.520
Are they going to be able to stay in there while you fix that that home up or that?

02:50:00.520 --> 02:50:02.280
No, they will not be able to.

02:50:02.280 --> 02:50:07.120
OK, so where will they go while you fix that rent up?

02:50:07.120 --> 02:50:10.000
We will work with them to create an accommodation.

02:50:10.000 --> 02:50:13.959
We have thirty five to forty units that are vacant currently that we're working on,

02:50:13.959 --> 02:50:17.399
bringing in a good condition that are promising to our tenants.

02:50:17.399 --> 02:50:22.120
And we will work with them to either ship them their hotel or any other accommodation

02:50:22.120 --> 02:50:25.360
that caters and mutually agreed on.

02:50:25.360 --> 02:50:27.920
Once they agree that they are okay to move forward,

02:50:27.920 --> 02:50:30.319
they will come and they will apply as a proper tenant,

02:50:30.319 --> 02:50:33.280
go through application screening, get their pets,

02:50:33.280 --> 02:50:36.079
everything identified, and while we're doing that process,

02:50:36.079 --> 02:50:38.120
once they're approved, we can move them,

02:50:38.120 --> 02:50:40.079
we'll cater with them, fix their property in seven

02:50:40.079 --> 02:50:41.879
to 14 days, as fast as possible,

02:50:41.879 --> 02:50:43.120
and then cater back to them,

02:50:43.120 --> 02:50:44.559
bring them back to their property.

02:50:44.559 --> 02:50:47.239
Now, once they do sign the 12 months agreement,

02:50:47.239 --> 02:50:50.200
the lease agreement with the market rent that we agree upon

02:50:50.200 --> 02:50:51.840
after fixing the property,

02:50:51.840 --> 02:50:54.120
so they're living in good condition, better condition,

02:50:54.120 --> 02:50:57.040
and less liability condition, and most of these property,

02:50:57.040 --> 02:50:58.079
if not all of these properties,

02:50:58.079 --> 02:51:01.659
are gonna be city court passing,

02:51:01.659 --> 02:51:03.200
so there will be no issues there,

02:51:03.200 --> 02:51:05.079
and then after 12 months, if they're interested

02:51:05.079 --> 02:51:06.840
in buying the home they're living in,

02:51:06.840 --> 02:51:08.000
they're more than welcome to.

02:51:08.000 --> 02:51:10.079
We'll do the finance agreement with them,

02:51:10.079 --> 02:51:12.639
3% down payment option, rent to one agreement,

02:51:12.639 --> 02:51:14.559
they wanna live, they wanna own,

02:51:14.559 --> 02:51:16.739
they wanna contribute to the community,

02:51:16.739 --> 02:51:18.559
we're right there for them.

02:51:18.559 --> 02:51:21.840
So let's say they're paying $600 a month rent

02:51:21.840 --> 02:51:25.360
or $700 a month rent right now where they're at.

02:51:25.360 --> 02:51:26.760
Their house needs to be fixed,

02:51:26.760 --> 02:51:28.639
their apartment needs to be fixed.

02:51:28.639 --> 02:51:31.559
They move into one of your homes that you've fixed up

02:51:31.559 --> 02:51:34.959
or that they can live in while you fix the other one up.

02:51:34.959 --> 02:51:37.920
What will they have to be paying for you a month,

02:51:37.920 --> 02:51:40.520
to you a month to stay in that place

02:51:40.520 --> 02:51:44.299
while their apartment or home or whatever is being fixed?

02:51:45.520 --> 02:51:47.319
That is up to us for a discuss, right?

02:51:47.319 --> 02:51:50.280
when we discuss the options on how that will work out,

02:51:50.280 --> 02:51:52.440
it most likely will remain the same as it is

02:51:52.440 --> 02:51:53.879
because we won't take long.

02:51:53.879 --> 02:51:55.559
We will not gonna take months.

02:51:55.559 --> 02:51:57.639
And so what they need to understand is

02:51:57.639 --> 02:52:00.659
after you fix up their apartment,

02:52:00.659 --> 02:52:02.920
then they have to sign a new lease

02:52:02.920 --> 02:52:05.079
cause the rent will go up, which is understandable

02:52:05.079 --> 02:52:08.959
cause you're fixing up and it costs to fix up an apartment.

02:52:08.959 --> 02:52:11.979
So the people would need to understand that.

02:52:11.979 --> 02:52:12.819
Okay. Right.

02:52:12.819 --> 02:52:13.659
Thank you.

02:52:13.659 --> 02:52:15.479
Ms. Johnson, either it's a yes or a no, right?

02:52:15.479 --> 02:52:45.479
if there's a yes, they're agreeing to what are we going to do with them? How are we going to work with them? And given the condition that they deserve? If they say no, that is not the end of the world, right? There is no, like, hard code rule to evict them for a certain amount of time. We understand, I have family, I have kids, right? We're not evil people here. We're trying to provide good service to the community here. That's the whole idea. And if they feel like, hey, they need a couple of months, they need help, they need guidance, that's what we're here for. That's what we're going to individually

02:52:45.479 --> 02:52:48.659
We work with each and every tenant and cater to their needs.

02:52:48.659 --> 02:52:51.920
Some may need two months, some may need three months,

02:52:51.920 --> 02:52:54.120
some may need four months and we can help them get

02:52:54.120 --> 02:52:56.639
a Section 8 approved or some sort of housing authority

02:52:56.639 --> 02:52:59.360
approved or whatever we can to work with you guys

02:52:59.360 --> 02:53:02.760
to cater to their needs and make sure they're not homeless.

02:53:02.760 --> 02:53:05.959
But six months is what we're even going up to.

02:53:05.959 --> 02:53:07.479
We got 60 days.

02:53:07.479 --> 02:53:11.040
And like I said, I wouldn't wanna have this conversation

02:53:11.040 --> 02:53:12.959
to disturb other landlords.

02:53:12.959 --> 02:53:13.959
That's not what you wanna hear.

02:53:13.959 --> 02:53:15.319
You don't wanna step on anybody's toes.

02:53:15.319 --> 02:53:35.340
I want you to know that I hear you loud and clear, but I also want you to know that I

02:53:35.340 --> 02:53:45.659
saw the letters that were put on the houses, so to sit here or stand there and make out

02:53:45.659 --> 02:53:50.659
like what I said didn't happen, it's bull crap.

02:53:54.600 --> 02:53:59.600
I saw the video of the call saying,

02:53:59.959 --> 02:54:03.760
we're not gonna raise your rent now.

02:54:03.760 --> 02:54:08.760
There was 123, I believe, month-to-month renters

02:54:11.959 --> 02:54:15.440
that received this notice on their door

02:54:15.440 --> 02:54:20.440
and it said $1,200 when they were paying $600.

02:54:21.000 --> 02:54:23.739
One said $1,249.

02:54:23.739 --> 02:54:25.200
You have the letters.

02:54:25.200 --> 02:54:28.219
I'm not telling you nothing you don't already know.

02:54:28.219 --> 02:54:31.079
That was not put on the door.

02:54:31.079 --> 02:54:31.920
That was not provided to them.

02:54:31.920 --> 02:54:34.040
No, but there was a letter put on the door

02:54:34.040 --> 02:54:36.680
and when they contacted you, that's what they were told.

02:54:36.680 --> 02:54:41.680
And then last week you pulled back all of what you said

02:54:41.680 --> 02:55:15.100
All of what you said and now what you said tonight, I guess is what's in place, but when those people were here last week with their kids crying thinking they were going to be homeless, it was based upon a letter they had got from Freeport Portfolio, LLC, and you, your one, telling them that they had to

02:55:15.100 --> 02:55:20.100
and Sine and Lease and their rent was going up or move.

02:55:20.739 --> 02:55:22.739
They have not come and told me this.

02:55:22.739 --> 02:55:25.579
They must have come and told you this, but not me this.

02:55:25.579 --> 02:55:26.860
And I'm here telling you this,

02:55:26.860 --> 02:55:29.020
the letter that was put to the door

02:55:29.020 --> 02:55:31.139
did not have any market rent,

02:55:31.139 --> 02:55:32.780
any type of rental discussion.

02:55:32.780 --> 02:55:35.260
I had the discussion in person with them

02:55:35.260 --> 02:55:37.540
to show them the range of rents

02:55:37.540 --> 02:55:39.620
that our market is paying right now,

02:55:39.620 --> 02:55:43.459
including section eight, Vannebago or Gilgo,

02:55:43.459 --> 02:55:45.420
and any other Freeport Housing Authority,

02:55:45.420 --> 02:55:47.659
what they're paying to have them understand

02:55:47.659 --> 02:55:50.420
what the situation is and what the market rent should be like

02:55:50.420 --> 02:55:52.659
on the condition that they deserve.

02:55:52.659 --> 02:55:55.180
And I was making sure they comprehend

02:55:55.180 --> 02:55:56.860
everything that I'm saying.

02:55:56.860 --> 02:55:59.100
They have not told me on my face, nothing.

02:55:59.100 --> 02:56:00.219
They may have told you in the back

02:56:00.219 --> 02:56:02.579
or been online on Facebook or different social media

02:56:02.579 --> 02:56:05.719
and be the hypocrites that they are, pardon my French.

02:56:07.420 --> 02:56:08.819
But I'm here.

02:56:08.819 --> 02:56:11.299
I'm here to ensure that we can help them out.

02:56:11.299 --> 02:56:12.940
And I'm telling the truth here.

02:56:13.459 --> 02:56:18.459
I'm here telling you, none of the letter owners there said anything about the market rent.

02:56:18.459 --> 02:56:20.459
So I don't know how you can tell me that I'm lying here.

02:56:20.459 --> 02:56:24.459
No, when they spoke with you, this is what they were informed.

02:56:24.459 --> 02:56:26.459
When they spoke with me, what were they informed? In person?

02:56:26.459 --> 02:56:27.459
Yes.

02:56:27.459 --> 02:56:28.459
And I was there and sitting in front of them?

02:56:28.459 --> 02:56:33.459
And then some of them have waited for you to come in and do an inspection and you didn't even show up.

02:56:33.459 --> 02:56:39.459
No, I showed up. I showed up. I stopped showing up because of the mess that was created and rumors that was created.

02:56:39.459 --> 02:56:45.440
It didn't serve my time to ensure that that they were kind of lobbying against what I'm trying to say

02:56:46.600 --> 02:56:48.600
So I hope I've addressed your questions

02:56:50.379 --> 02:56:52.379
Okay

02:56:52.379 --> 02:56:56.219
Okay, so let's not debate between the two. This is

02:56:57.059 --> 02:57:01.000
If you want to have a private phone call, you're welcome to do that

02:57:01.000 --> 02:57:05.120
Is there any other discussion and anyone would like to have on item number 18?

02:57:06.260 --> 02:57:08.260
I appreciate that. I just wanted to add

02:57:08.260 --> 02:57:13.959
Thank you to you. I know you've contacted my department about registering your rentals. You've showed up to any of the

02:57:14.459 --> 02:57:21.940
Recently there was a some code cases. Thank you for showing up. I wanted to add because it was brought up by City Manager Boyer

02:57:23.260 --> 02:57:28.139
Currently the city of Freeport. I want to thank in particular Doug Quinn

02:57:29.180 --> 02:57:32.540
Katie Smith and my entire staff has done a

02:57:33.700 --> 02:57:35.700
tremendous amount of work

02:57:35.700 --> 02:57:41.059
ensuring that we prosecute anybody who is not a registered rental and there is currently going

02:57:41.059 --> 02:57:46.979
to be 480 properties going to have cases in October and that's a total of 332 landlords

02:57:47.700 --> 02:57:53.860
that are going to be receiving fines of $500 per unit. So I would like to state for the record that

02:57:53.860 --> 02:58:00.340
this council has put a tremendous challenge to my staff and we have delivered and there will be five

02:58:00.340 --> 02:58:12.340
We are scheduling five hearings in October that are special hearings to prosecute and put everybody up for $500 per unit fines who have not registered the rentals.

02:58:12.340 --> 02:58:18.340
So the message is clear and is out there that if you have not registered, you will be fined accordingly.

02:58:18.340 --> 02:58:24.340
And thank you for making that a priority.

02:58:24.340 --> 02:58:29.340
And thank you to my staff for all the hard work that they put in to protect our community.

02:58:29.340 --> 02:58:47.340
So just wanted to make that clear. Thank you. And thank you, Moby, for coming. We will move on to item number 19, which is discussion regarding amending section 220.10 slash 23 AB written and verbal public comments. Alderman Stacy.

02:58:48.340 --> 02:58:51.340
Alderperson Simmons, do you have this one?

02:59:24.000 --> 02:59:39.760
So, are you proposing a motion to have the attorneys draft what you're asking?

02:59:39.760 --> 02:59:45.840
I'm asking if that's what you're looking for, because in order for that to be done,

02:59:45.840 --> 02:59:50.319
there has to be a vote of council that it's the will of the council to task the attorneys

02:59:50.319 --> 02:59:51.319
to do something.

02:59:51.319 --> 02:59:57.719
So, I'm asking you, is that the direction you want, is a motion to do that?

02:59:57.719 --> 03:00:04.639
Is there a second? Second. So we have a motion made by Alderman Simmons seconded by Alderman

03:00:04.639 --> 03:00:16.799
Stacy in drafting the amendment as stated. And can I just say something? Sure. Prime

03:00:16.799 --> 03:00:28.090
example last week with those families and then people having to leave for whatever reason

03:00:28.090 --> 03:00:30.649
and they got to go to work at school tomorrow.

03:00:30.649 --> 03:00:34.430
We had a four hour plus meeting or even tonight.

03:00:34.430 --> 03:00:39.270
This gentleman wanted to say something

03:00:40.350 --> 03:00:45.350
as far as thanking somebody for something,

03:00:45.950 --> 03:00:48.610
but it was not an agenda item.

03:00:48.610 --> 03:00:51.110
And so he continued to sit here waiting

03:00:51.110 --> 03:00:53.690
for the end of public comments.

03:00:53.690 --> 03:00:58.690
And so what this would do would give whomever

03:00:58.690 --> 03:01:09.360
the right to speak at the beginning if they're here and move forward and not

03:01:09.360 --> 03:01:17.559
have to sit and wait we've had elderly people here sitting and waiting and why

03:01:17.559 --> 03:01:23.520
not just get it done and get it over with and move forward yeah that will come

03:01:23.520 --> 03:01:26.200
Walsh, and I'm on the non-agenda, non-agenda.

03:01:26.200 --> 03:01:27.200
Did you want to speak?

03:01:27.200 --> 03:01:28.200
I'm sorry.

03:01:28.200 --> 03:01:29.200
I'm sorry.

03:01:29.200 --> 03:01:35.680
But we're saying for public comments, it doesn't have to be an agenda item.

03:01:35.680 --> 03:01:36.680
Exactly.

03:01:36.680 --> 03:01:37.680
It can be anything.

03:01:37.680 --> 03:01:41.120
So the motion is to have the attorneys write that up.

03:01:41.120 --> 03:01:42.120
Yes.

03:01:42.120 --> 03:01:43.120
If you don't agree, vote no.

03:01:43.120 --> 03:01:47.399
If you do, then, or it doesn't matter, it still has to go for a vote once it's done.

03:01:47.399 --> 03:01:51.639
So it's, the motion is to task the attorneys to do this.

03:01:51.639 --> 03:01:52.639
Yes.

03:01:52.639 --> 03:01:56.239
if there's no further discussion on that, Alderman Sellers?

03:01:56.239 --> 03:02:05.840
I have a problem with that is because really our meetings are long is because we're coming unprepared.

03:02:05.840 --> 03:02:13.639
So we're asking question after question after question after question instead of knowing proper preparation prevents poor performance.

03:02:13.639 --> 03:02:20.840
So my issue is being here four hours on going over and over and over a bunch of stuff

03:02:20.840 --> 03:02:40.840
and then we've got you want it at the beginning and you want it at the end, that's a lot because the purpose of having a public forum for agenda items at the beginning of the meeting and other items at the end of it is allow the council to effectively complete its business effectively.

03:02:40.840 --> 03:02:47.479
If everyone were allowed to speak freely on any subject at the start, it would prevent

03:02:47.479 --> 03:02:53.399
the council from moving forward with the material and the required formula action.

03:02:53.399 --> 03:03:00.399
A council meeting is designed to have a meeting to conduct public, not public business, but

03:03:00.399 --> 03:03:02.959
council business in the public.

03:03:02.959 --> 03:03:09.239
It's not to have everybody just talking because we cannot, if they get up there and speak,

03:03:09.239 --> 03:03:12.079
It's not going to be dialogue, they're just going to get there and speak and we're just

03:03:12.079 --> 03:03:13.459
going to look at them.

03:03:13.459 --> 03:03:15.799
We are talking about...

03:03:15.799 --> 03:03:21.000
It's not going to be, it's not going to be a dialogue where everybody gets up.

03:03:21.000 --> 03:03:25.139
If we're going to have it at the beginning and at the end, that's just way too much.

03:03:25.139 --> 03:03:27.840
We are talking about three minutes.

03:03:27.840 --> 03:03:32.399
But three minutes with ten people is a long time.

03:03:32.399 --> 03:03:35.000
My God.

03:03:35.000 --> 03:03:37.200
I don't have a problem with people speaking.

03:03:37.200 --> 03:03:38.479
Let's just take a vote.

03:03:38.479 --> 03:03:40.760
We've been here for over three hours.

03:03:40.760 --> 03:03:44.680
Let's take the vote on if you want to task the attorneys to do what was said.

03:03:44.680 --> 03:03:48.559
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

03:03:48.559 --> 03:04:15.200
I'm sorry, say that again?

03:04:15.200 --> 03:04:16.200
And not at the end?

03:04:16.200 --> 03:04:23.549
Yeah, because they said at the beginning and at the end.

03:04:23.549 --> 03:04:26.309
We work for the people.

03:04:26.309 --> 03:04:28.030
You don't have to tell me that, I know who we are.

03:04:28.030 --> 03:04:29.030
We work for the people.

03:04:29.030 --> 03:04:31.030
I know who we work for.

03:04:31.030 --> 03:04:32.030
Madam Clerk?

03:04:32.030 --> 03:04:33.829
I have a question.

03:04:33.829 --> 03:04:38.709
It is written into the ordinance, Attorney Zito, help me out here, there is a limit on

03:04:38.709 --> 03:04:39.709
and so on.

03:04:39.709 --> 03:04:42.670
How many people can speak to the same topic?

03:04:42.670 --> 03:04:47.590
Can you refresh how that works and would this apply when it's, I mean, if it's not related

03:04:47.590 --> 03:04:51.629
to an agenda item, we could have seven, eight different topics.

03:04:51.629 --> 03:04:55.229
Now last week, as an example, we had one topic.

03:04:55.229 --> 03:05:00.870
So if you could address both multiple topics and one topic, please.

03:05:00.870 --> 03:05:09.110
So any topic, as of right now, can have a maximum of six speakers on it, and if there's

03:05:09.110 --> 03:05:12.190
people on both sides, then they each get, you potentially get three and three, two and

03:05:12.190 --> 03:05:17.270
two, whatever it is, everyone gets their fair up, up to six speakers on any topic.

03:05:17.270 --> 03:05:22.370
So yeah, you could have a lot, you could have eight different topics, you could have up

03:05:22.370 --> 03:05:28.110
to six speakers on each topic, three minutes a person, it'd be all up front.

03:05:28.110 --> 03:05:30.950
It's not that many people having something to say.

03:05:32.430 --> 03:05:34.190
That's just an excuse.

03:05:34.190 --> 03:05:35.030
Okay.

03:05:35.030 --> 03:05:37.389
So Alderman Simmons, just to be clear,

03:05:37.389 --> 03:05:40.270
your motion is to task the attorneys

03:05:40.270 --> 03:05:45.149
to write the ordinance, rewrite the ordinance

03:05:45.149 --> 03:05:47.829
so it is public comment on agenda items

03:05:47.829 --> 03:05:52.969
and non-agenda only at the beginning.

03:05:52.969 --> 03:05:55.149
And is that your second, Alderman Stacy?

03:05:55.149 --> 03:05:56.450
Yes.

03:05:56.450 --> 03:05:57.930
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

03:05:57.930 --> 03:05:59.270
Shadle. No.

03:05:59.270 --> 03:06:34.200
Sanders? Yes. Sellers? No. Klemm? No. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? No. And Stacy? How do you vote? Aye. The motion fails. Of course it fails. Five to three. Okay we will move on to reports of department heads finance. Thank you your honor. I'd just like to echo what Dovie said that finance committee of the whole begins next week and

03:06:34.200 --> 03:06:38.600
and they should be before each council slash COW meeting

03:06:38.600 --> 03:06:40.719
until we pass the budget.

03:06:40.719 --> 03:06:41.920
Is there a time?

03:06:41.920 --> 03:06:45.639
Would you explain the different format, time format?

03:06:45.639 --> 03:06:47.979
I'll try and do that as well as I can.

03:06:48.840 --> 03:06:52.840
So we did set up the Finance Committee of the Whole

03:06:52.840 --> 03:06:55.360
to begin at 5.30 next week

03:06:55.360 --> 03:07:00.360
with the COW meeting to begin immediately following.

03:07:01.459 --> 03:07:03.559
So we're trying to eliminate the gap

03:07:03.559 --> 03:07:18.559
We have a meeting that sometimes happened last year between meetings where we all were kind of sitting around waiting 15 minutes until 6 o'clock to begin the next meeting, so we're going to start at 5.30. Once the finance COW is finished, we'll go right into the COW.

03:07:18.559 --> 03:07:23.559
Thank you. The COW. Thank you.

03:07:23.559 --> 03:07:24.559
Attorney.

03:07:24.559 --> 03:07:56.100
So just to clarify I think that the draft special COW meeting has 545 so most likely your finance will go at least 15 minutes so it shouldn't be from a practical standpoint an issue but heaven forbid that you have a finance COW start at 530 and let's say it only went five minutes you still wouldn't be able to start the COW until till 545 If you wanted to I mean I mean the reality is you're probably not going to have a finance COW

03:07:56.100 --> 03:07:57.940
only go 15 minutes, I would imagine.

03:07:57.940 --> 03:08:00.579
Did you look at my draft agenda, Attorney Zito?

03:08:00.579 --> 03:08:04.860
It's set at 5.45 or as soon as the finance COW adjourns.

03:08:04.860 --> 03:08:05.700
Correct, but-

03:08:05.700 --> 03:08:07.219
But it can't be earlier than 5.45.

03:08:07.219 --> 03:08:09.979
Exactly, so that really applies if it's at 5.50,

03:08:09.979 --> 03:08:11.360
then you can start right at 5.50,

03:08:11.360 --> 03:08:14.100
but you have to set a time for the special COW

03:08:14.100 --> 03:08:14.940
to still start.

03:08:17.180 --> 03:08:18.180
Director Duckman?

03:08:19.860 --> 03:08:21.219
Nothing tonight, Madam Mayor.

03:08:21.219 --> 03:08:22.299
Thank you, Darren?

03:08:22.299 --> 03:08:38.299
Just a reminder, the Hancock Vidoc will be closed. If it wasn't done today, it'll be done tomorrow, and it should be probably three and a half months it'll be closed for the renovations to lower the street.

03:08:38.299 --> 03:08:39.299
Mayer?

03:08:39.299 --> 03:08:41.520
Yes, thank you, your honor.

03:08:41.520 --> 03:08:48.860
Last Thursday, B-Shift responded to a local gas station on West Avenue for a hydraulic

03:08:48.860 --> 03:08:52.379
oil spill on the property.

03:08:52.379 --> 03:08:57.340
The on-duty shift used 26 bags of oil dried to contain the spill.

03:08:57.340 --> 03:09:00.700
They are charged the responsibility of hiring a cleanup crew.

03:09:00.700 --> 03:09:04.459
We just contain it, keep it from going any further.

03:09:04.459 --> 03:09:09.219
We are invoking the spill or pay ordinance to the responsible party.

03:09:09.219 --> 03:09:15.659
They will be reimbursing the city nearly $1,800 for our response and our materials used.

03:09:15.659 --> 03:09:19.149
That's all I have.

03:09:19.149 --> 03:09:20.149
Thank you.

03:09:20.149 --> 03:09:21.149
Police?

03:09:21.149 --> 03:09:22.149
Yeah, I have no report tonight.

03:09:22.149 --> 03:09:23.149
IT?

03:09:23.149 --> 03:09:23.989
I'm sorry.

03:09:23.989 --> 03:09:32.860
IT? Airport? Just real quick, just to let everybody know that this year, unfortunately, we will not be having the air show.

03:09:33.459 --> 03:09:39.139
The promoter ended up having some health issues, so he is not able to continue on. So

03:09:39.620 --> 03:09:43.299
first and foremost, hopefully he gets on the right track and

03:09:43.899 --> 03:09:50.260
he can end up ramping up for next year. So, but this year is unfortunately cancelled. Just to let you know. Thank you.

03:09:50.260 --> 03:09:59.620
City Manager. Just want to reach out to the staff that's been working on all of

03:09:59.620 --> 03:10:04.180
our road resurfacing program this year. I just wanted to say thank you all and got

03:10:04.180 --> 03:10:09.100
a busy week and I appreciate all your effort. Thank you. And I have nothing new

03:10:09.100 --> 03:10:16.780
to add Alderman Shadle. Thursday 6 o'clock shorts on Park Boulevard for the

03:10:16.780 --> 03:10:18.780
Sixth Ward, Neighborhood Bunch.

03:10:18.780 --> 03:10:20.780
Oldman Sanders?

03:10:20.780 --> 03:10:26.780
Yeah, I just want to know, are we almost in completion with our street program for this year?

03:10:26.780 --> 03:10:37.780
No, we're getting there. We still have one that we're going to do that was an add-on, Hans Harvey.

03:10:37.780 --> 03:10:43.780
Carroll still has to be surfaced. That should be happening in a couple weeks, but we're making significant progress.

03:10:43.780 --> 03:10:49.780
the westward water main expansion should start in two weeks so if I had engaged

03:10:49.780 --> 03:10:55.100
we're probably 70% done but a lot of good work going on and the crews are

03:10:55.100 --> 03:10:58.260
making really good progress and everybody's working well together so

03:10:58.260 --> 03:11:07.219
okay. Alderman Sellers? Oh, nothing. Thank you. Alderman Klemm? Nothing. Alderman Johnson?

03:11:07.219 --> 03:11:11.680
I'd just like to thank all the people that came out for the block party on

03:11:11.680 --> 03:11:14.079
and Saturday, it was, there was a lot of people there

03:11:14.079 --> 03:11:17.639
and I think a lot of the residents that were there

03:11:17.639 --> 03:11:19.959
did get some resources and information

03:11:19.959 --> 03:11:21.280
that they needed to help them.

03:11:21.280 --> 03:11:23.719
So I was glad to see that.

03:11:23.719 --> 03:11:24.559
Alderman Simmons?

03:11:24.559 --> 03:11:25.399
I'm sorry, where was it?

03:11:25.399 --> 03:11:26.399
It was the block party.

03:11:26.399 --> 03:11:28.879
It was over at the Boys and Girls Club

03:11:28.879 --> 03:11:31.280
in the parking lot there.

03:11:31.280 --> 03:11:32.120
Thank you.

03:11:32.120 --> 03:11:40.979
Alderman Simmons?

03:11:40.979 --> 03:11:42.040
Alderman Parker?

03:11:42.040 --> 03:11:43.280
Nothing new, Your Honor.

03:11:43.280 --> 03:11:44.879
Alderman Stacey?

03:11:44.879 --> 03:11:47.639
Yes, I would like to announce

03:11:47.639 --> 03:11:51.639
that there's going to be a fourth annual

03:11:51.639 --> 03:11:56.639
Terrence Cheeto Haynes, three on three classic.

03:11:56.920 --> 03:12:01.040
This event will be held Saturday, September the 13th,

03:12:01.040 --> 03:12:03.760
starting at 10 o'clock a.m.

03:12:06.100 --> 03:12:11.159
The age groups for the teams are 10 to 12, 13 to 15,

03:12:11.159 --> 03:12:14.059
and 16 to 18.

03:12:14.059 --> 03:12:16.579
There's no charge for this event,

03:12:16.579 --> 03:12:20.440
but they will be accepting donations

03:12:21.520 --> 03:12:25.940
toward the Terrence Cheeto Haynes

03:12:25.940 --> 03:12:29.520
Stop the Violence Scholarship Foundation.

03:12:29.520 --> 03:12:31.319
This is the young man that was shot

03:12:31.319 --> 03:12:36.319
on Pleasant and Galena a few years ago.

03:12:38.500 --> 03:12:44.780
And this is the fourth annual event in his honor.

03:12:44.780 --> 03:12:50.250
Move on to public comments. Rod Holtz, thank you for waiting.

03:12:50.250 --> 03:12:58.020
I'll make this short since it's been a long meeting.

03:12:58.020 --> 03:13:02.020
Starting in January, I took on a project

03:13:02.020 --> 03:13:06.020
of trying to get my driveway redone.

03:13:06.020 --> 03:13:10.020
I ran into some loopholes,

03:13:10.020 --> 03:13:14.020
one of which being my wife had ovarian cancer,

03:13:14.020 --> 03:13:18.020
and sadly she passed away at the end of July.

03:13:18.020 --> 03:13:23.020
She never got to see our new driveway, but she did.

03:13:26.659 --> 03:13:29.959
Everything got completed around the middle of August

03:13:29.959 --> 03:13:34.959
and I had one loophole that I was trying to overcome.

03:13:37.739 --> 03:13:40.780
And that was where the street met my driveway.

03:13:41.659 --> 03:13:46.659
So I went and I talked to our called

03:13:46.659 --> 03:13:53.819
the street department after a friend of mine suggested that's who I try.

03:13:53.819 --> 03:14:01.420
I talked to her, the lady took down my address and she told me that she says within the next

03:14:01.420 --> 03:14:07.879
week or so when the pothole people are out in your area, they'll be gladly to fix the

03:14:07.879 --> 03:14:08.879
end of your driveway.

03:14:08.879 --> 03:14:16.440
I said great, about a week and a half went by, nothing happened.

03:14:16.440 --> 03:14:21.600
Well, I was in the area of the street department down on Island Avenue, so I decided, well,

03:14:21.600 --> 03:14:26.840
I'm gonna try going down there, speaking to them one-on-one.

03:14:26.840 --> 03:14:28.819
I wish I never did.

03:14:28.819 --> 03:14:34.680
The lady that I encountered down there was very rude.

03:14:34.680 --> 03:14:37.620
She acted like my first impression to her.

03:14:37.620 --> 03:14:39.659
She wanted to get in a fight with me.

03:14:39.659 --> 03:14:47.219
All I wanted to do was get some information on when they were going to fix that or if

03:14:47.219 --> 03:14:50.420
they were going to fix that.

03:14:50.420 --> 03:15:02.059
So I walked away kind of sad because I got another stone I got to try to overcome.

03:15:02.059 --> 03:15:05.979
So I figured, well, I'm going to try calling the city hall.

03:15:05.979 --> 03:15:09.020
I did one morning before I went to work.

03:15:09.020 --> 03:15:20.020
I encountered Michelle Nelson, she was very kind, considerate, listened to my going on

03:15:20.020 --> 03:15:26.540
with my driveway and she referred me, she says I'll take this down as an email.

03:15:26.540 --> 03:15:32.379
She took my name and my phone number and she talked with Darren Steekle.

03:15:32.379 --> 03:15:42.979
in two hours, Darren called me up and wanted to know what was going on and I told him and

03:15:42.979 --> 03:15:50.379
he informed me that, and I didn't know this, but that the end of the, where the street

03:15:50.379 --> 03:15:58.659
and then the driveway meets, that would be my contractor's doings. Well, I thought they're

03:15:58.659 --> 03:16:06.959
and other concrete people, but we were talking a little bit further and Darren finally wanted

03:16:06.959 --> 03:16:20.219
me to take a picture and I sent it to him and sorry, but this was around 10 o'clock.

03:16:20.219 --> 03:16:28.299
I went home from work at lunchtime and I got out of my truck and I parked out on the street

03:16:28.299 --> 03:16:34.459
and I was walking towards and I just about fell down on the street I was

03:16:34.459 --> 03:16:43.059
amazed totally amazed with the hard work that you guys do during the summer and

03:16:43.059 --> 03:16:51.219
everything I get that no but it looked totally professional and I want to give

03:16:51.219 --> 03:17:23.459
Are there any other public comments? I'd like to clarify some things. Joy talked about Henny.

03:17:23.459 --> 03:17:31.819
We've lost Henny, we've lost Tutty, and we've lost Taylor. That's three areas

03:17:31.819 --> 03:17:38.180
where our children played and had in the wards that they're talking about. That's

03:17:38.180 --> 03:17:40.659
That's three, okay?

03:17:40.659 --> 03:17:42.079
History.

03:17:42.079 --> 03:17:46.739
Now, as far as what he's talking about,

03:17:47.700 --> 03:17:51.899
he never mentioned the seven day notices

03:17:51.899 --> 03:17:53.399
that we've all seen.

03:17:54.360 --> 03:17:57.000
As far as the city is concerned,

03:17:57.000 --> 03:17:59.479
what we heard from you guys a week ago

03:17:59.479 --> 03:18:00.700
was everything you couldn't do

03:18:00.700 --> 03:18:03.420
and nothing that you could do.

03:18:03.420 --> 03:18:07.680
What we also found was when Joshua had his meeting,

03:18:07.680 --> 03:18:11.680
we had no Rob Boyer, we had no Jodi Miller,

03:18:11.680 --> 03:18:16.500
we had no older people other than the two that were there.

03:18:16.500 --> 03:18:18.680
Which tells us how much you really care

03:18:18.680 --> 03:18:21.079
about what is happening to your constituents

03:18:21.079 --> 03:18:22.559
because you weren't there.

03:18:22.559 --> 03:18:24.219
You weren't there to hear them,

03:18:24.219 --> 03:18:25.879
you weren't there to listen to them,

03:18:25.879 --> 03:18:27.639
you weren't there to answer questions

03:18:27.639 --> 03:18:30.399
and even when you did something on the television,

03:18:30.399 --> 03:18:33.799
neither of you stood before a television camera

03:18:33.799 --> 03:18:36.479
and addressed the constituents in this town.

03:18:36.479 --> 03:18:40.200
What you did was is use someone who is an employee

03:18:40.200 --> 03:18:44.760
of the city that nobody knows to speak for you.

03:18:44.760 --> 03:18:45.760
It's shameful.

03:18:46.639 --> 03:18:51.120
It is absolutely shameful that you guys won't stand

03:18:51.120 --> 03:18:53.840
before your constituents and listen to them.

03:18:53.840 --> 03:18:58.120
Tonight's vote on the comment section is absolutely

03:18:58.120 --> 03:19:00.600
ridiculous that you would allow this to go on

03:19:00.600 --> 03:19:03.239
for four to five hours and I don't care what the comments

03:19:03.239 --> 03:19:05.479
or what the proposals are on the floor,

03:19:05.479 --> 03:19:09.319
that you would allow someone with babies, with children

03:19:09.319 --> 03:19:12.520
to be sitting here for four hours to speak with you guys.

03:19:12.520 --> 03:19:14.200
When you can change the ordinance

03:19:14.200 --> 03:19:16.200
and you can change the direction of this meeting

03:19:16.200 --> 03:19:17.659
at your own beck and call

03:19:17.659 --> 03:19:19.840
whenever you feel like you want to.

03:19:19.840 --> 03:19:22.239
And all we were asking for was the...

03:19:22.239 --> 03:19:22.959
All we were asking for was the courtesy

03:19:22.959 --> 03:19:26.920
to allow individuals who had to go to work,

03:19:26.920 --> 03:19:29.040
some of whom are working two to three jobs

03:19:29.040 --> 03:19:31.479
with children standing beside them

03:19:31.479 --> 03:19:35.319
to speak to you as your constituents, as taxpayers,

03:19:35.319 --> 03:19:38.600
as working individuals in this town, you refuse to do that.

03:19:38.600 --> 03:19:40.840
And tonight, city council, shame on you,

03:19:40.840 --> 03:19:42.639
you refuse to do it again.

03:19:44.319 --> 03:19:46.120
You can sit here and listen to the monarchy

03:19:46.120 --> 03:19:48.280
that you are being fed by him,

03:19:48.280 --> 03:19:50.159
or you can listen to your constituents

03:19:50.159 --> 03:19:51.959
and what you need to do is sit down

03:19:51.959 --> 03:19:53.920
and have a conversation with them.

03:19:54.979 --> 03:19:56.319
Instead of listening to him,

03:19:56.319 --> 03:19:57.959
listen to the people that is being affected.

03:19:57.959 --> 03:20:00.639
This man knows absolutely nothing about this community

03:20:00.639 --> 03:20:02.600
nor does he know anything about the people

03:20:02.600 --> 03:20:04.000
that are being affected.

03:20:04.000 --> 03:20:05.520
And I'm gonna tell you guys something.

03:20:05.520 --> 03:20:09.920
If you think for a second that this isn't going to affect

03:20:09.920 --> 03:20:12.379
this entire town and I've said this before

03:20:12.379 --> 03:20:15.200
and everything that I've said has come to fortition

03:20:15.200 --> 03:20:18.899
and that is when there becomes a problem in this town,

03:20:18.899 --> 03:20:21.360
it's not gonna just happen on the east side.

03:20:21.360 --> 03:20:23.600
It's not gonna just happen on the west side.

03:20:23.600 --> 03:20:25.940
Their properties are all over town.

03:20:27.079 --> 03:20:40.049
Is there any other public comments this evening?

03:20:40.049 --> 03:20:42.450
I wanna start by saying thank you to, you know,

03:20:42.450 --> 03:20:45.149
everybody involved positively and God like up here.

03:20:46.250 --> 03:20:51.250
And I wanna say congratulations to the people that came

03:20:51.370 --> 03:20:53.809
last week stood up and told their heartfelt stories

03:20:53.809 --> 03:20:57.049
because they really showed more care and concern

03:20:57.049 --> 03:20:59.530
about themselves than our city leaders.

03:20:59.530 --> 03:21:01.690
And I also want to say thank you to Josh Atkins.

03:21:01.690 --> 03:21:03.069
I don't care if y'all don't like him or not,

03:21:03.069 --> 03:21:05.090
but we wouldn't sit here and talk about this

03:21:05.090 --> 03:21:06.850
if he didn't held that meeting.

03:21:06.850 --> 03:21:08.809
But he was the only one that took the time out

03:21:08.809 --> 03:21:10.209
to make a meeting.

03:21:10.209 --> 03:21:14.250
Before that situation came to this council board,

03:21:14.250 --> 03:21:16.690
you've seen this on all social media

03:21:16.690 --> 03:21:19.690
because we know you guys watch it, shadow or not,

03:21:19.690 --> 03:21:22.450
but you guys chose to ignore it until it became chaotic.

03:21:22.450 --> 03:21:28.930
and as leaders you should have held a PowerPoint presentation or whatever you did that accounted

03:21:28.930 --> 03:21:34.049
to really nothing because we still have not asked for you to control the amount.

03:21:34.049 --> 03:21:40.729
We simply ask for the time to be a good timely fashion to give them considering that Freeport

03:21:40.729 --> 03:21:45.770
does not have jobs to accommodate anything to be raised.

03:21:45.770 --> 03:21:52.329
We do not have a council board that does not raise every tax they can on all of the people

03:21:52.329 --> 03:21:58.049
Here. You guys need to think about the future. We don't have half of the creativity that

03:21:58.049 --> 03:22:05.889
we need to run a city. Let's use this as an example. We paid what we say, Winter got $78,000

03:22:05.889 --> 03:22:11.010
for boarding up the bottom of that building and putting a six-foot fence around it. Where

03:22:11.010 --> 03:22:20.090
the hell is they shopping at? OSB at half-inch is only $12 to $15. If we needed 300 sheets

03:22:20.090 --> 03:22:23.729
to that, that would only came to $5,000.

03:22:23.729 --> 03:22:26.969
Let's say the fence, way out of the ballpark, cost 20.

03:22:26.969 --> 03:22:30.170
Where's $78,000 accommodated for?

03:22:30.170 --> 03:22:33.129
My suggestion to the council is that you guys try

03:22:33.129 --> 03:22:36.229
to do a little bit more detailed finding

03:22:36.229 --> 03:22:39.190
on what they actually are doing, the cost, the material,

03:22:39.190 --> 03:22:42.069
the anything that they use, because these are our dollars

03:22:42.069 --> 03:22:45.209
that are paying for this, or it may be a grant

03:22:45.209 --> 03:22:46.049
that we could be used.

03:22:46.049 --> 03:22:48.370
I don't know where that money coming from, to be honest.

03:22:48.370 --> 03:22:51.709
but I'm sure as thirsty as we sound,

03:22:51.709 --> 03:22:54.930
we don't have money to be thrown away.

03:22:54.930 --> 03:22:56.510
We buying all kinds of new stuff.

03:22:56.510 --> 03:22:58.309
This is the most I've seen the distressed city

03:22:58.309 --> 03:23:00.430
spend money on frivolous things.

03:23:00.430 --> 03:23:02.510
Trailers, lawn mowers, and all that stuff.

03:23:02.510 --> 03:23:05.469
And then I wanna know that every election season come up,

03:23:05.469 --> 03:23:07.590
I see everybody all over in third war

03:23:07.590 --> 03:23:08.590
trying to get the approval

03:23:08.590 --> 03:23:10.629
and the support of the black people over there.

03:23:10.629 --> 03:23:12.750
I don't know why, I mean, it might not be an issue

03:23:12.750 --> 03:23:15.870
but why hasn't Jim, Ryan, Tasha, Yancey, Baldy,

03:23:15.870 --> 03:23:21.870
Partridge. Why ain't they been up here for no reward? Recognize all people, man. They got people, too.

03:23:23.870 --> 03:23:28.270
Any other public comments this evening? If not, oh, go ahead, Tommy.

03:23:41.469 --> 03:23:45.790
Tommy, I'm working real hard on that, I promise. You tell, you let them know I'm working real hard.

03:23:45.790 --> 03:23:54.149
and Dalyan. We got a question. Are you going to fix the pothole by Jefferson Suite? That

03:23:54.149 --> 03:24:08.409
certainly trying Tommy. Any other public comments? Go ahead. Good evening council. My name is

03:24:08.409 --> 03:24:13.209
Joshua. I'll keep this short and I promise suite and I'm going to start with Mr. Duckman

03:24:13.209 --> 03:24:20.450
over there. Outstanding with the toll of May and all that stuff. It's I'm shocked but I

03:24:20.450 --> 03:24:24.850
Kudos. Sounds fantastic. That's really good to hear. I hope that all works out.

03:24:27.409 --> 03:24:33.930
All right. Every one of you received an email from me a week ago, exactly a week

03:24:33.930 --> 03:24:41.329
ago. And what you chose to do with it was nothing. Fine. You know, who am I?

03:24:41.329 --> 03:24:46.370
Nobody, right? But then you sat here today and you argued for about 30 minutes,

03:24:46.370 --> 03:24:47.370
Huffines.

03:24:47.370 --> 03:25:00.090
I know it's easy from the outside to look at you guys and say, well, gosh, they should

03:25:00.090 --> 03:25:02.930
be doing this, or you should be doing this, or the mayor should be doing this.

03:25:02.930 --> 03:25:05.889
That is so easy and a luxury we get from out here.

03:25:05.889 --> 03:25:07.870
I understand that.

03:25:07.870 --> 03:25:12.329
But you guys could have taken that 30 minutes, had any of you either made a motion or just

03:25:12.329 --> 03:25:17.850
put it on the agenda and said this is our opportunity to talk about it.

03:25:17.850 --> 03:25:22.770
We can talk about it right now if Tom Klemm says I think it should be 120 days and Cecelia

03:25:22.770 --> 03:25:24.350
says no I think it should be 40.

03:25:24.350 --> 03:25:29.170
You guys could have used that time tonight however many hours we've been here and talked

03:25:29.170 --> 03:25:33.270
about it and been over and done with it or Alderman Johnson could have said I think we

03:25:33.270 --> 03:25:34.629
should add this in there.

03:25:34.629 --> 03:25:35.629
That was the time.

03:25:35.629 --> 03:25:39.329
You don't have to schedule another time to do it because I want to believe that this

03:25:39.329 --> 03:25:41.690
gentleman here is being as honest as possible.

03:25:41.690 --> 03:25:45.989
I talked to, not him, but his co-worker, and I can't remember her name, but she was very

03:25:45.989 --> 03:25:47.729
nice on the phone.

03:25:47.729 --> 03:25:50.690
We invited them to the meeting, they chose not to come.

03:25:50.690 --> 03:25:52.850
I want to assume that they are being truthful.

03:25:52.850 --> 03:25:59.809
But if they're not, your job in this room is to protect the people of this community.

03:25:59.809 --> 03:26:05.370
And you could have done that tonight by just putting in a simple 60-day amendment to that

03:26:05.370 --> 03:26:06.690
ordinance.

03:26:06.690 --> 03:26:10.750
And that would have taken them to, he could have went out tomorrow and said, boom, here's

03:26:10.750 --> 03:26:11.750
and others.

03:26:11.750 --> 03:26:14.270
There's your guys' 16-day notice, and that would have given them two months, but they

03:26:14.270 --> 03:26:16.309
would have 60 days to figure things out.

03:26:16.309 --> 03:26:21.870
Now they have no idea what's going to happen, because we just showed him, and I'm not picking

03:26:21.870 --> 03:26:25.989
on you, sir, that we're not going to do anything.

03:26:25.989 --> 03:26:29.469
We're going to talk about it for the next month.

03:26:29.469 --> 03:26:31.709
That's what we're going to do.

03:26:31.709 --> 03:26:35.729
And I just wish you guys, I don't know if it was about me, if it would have come from

03:26:35.729 --> 03:26:36.829
Miss Yocum.

03:26:36.829 --> 03:26:39.829
Maybe you guys would have taken it a little more seriously, but you guys could have done

03:26:39.829 --> 03:26:40.829
Johnson.

03:26:40.829 --> 03:26:42.190
And that's all the people are asking for.

03:26:42.190 --> 03:26:43.870
They shouldn't be calling me to do it.

03:26:43.870 --> 03:26:48.110
It's just they don't trust you to take them seriously.

03:26:48.110 --> 03:26:49.110
Thank you.

03:26:49.110 --> 03:26:51.350
Any other public comments?

03:26:51.350 --> 03:27:02.979
Hi.

03:27:02.979 --> 03:27:05.180
Sue Cook, Freeport.

03:27:05.180 --> 03:27:11.260
I just want to thank, I'm glad the 65 cap was gone.

03:27:11.260 --> 03:27:13.840
I just have to say, yes, good.

03:27:13.840 --> 03:27:16.040
That should be gone.

03:27:16.040 --> 03:27:23.639
If you're fit, ages should not keep anybody from a job, says the 65-year-old woman that's

03:27:23.639 --> 03:27:27.719
standing here, so I'm glad it's gone.

03:27:27.719 --> 03:27:33.559
The other thing is, do we have a contract with Aspen yet?

03:27:33.559 --> 03:27:37.319
Has that happened?

03:27:37.319 --> 03:27:38.659
I'm worried.

03:27:38.659 --> 03:27:46.540
We just celebrated Labor Day and we celebrated the unions and we celebrated workers and workers'

03:27:46.540 --> 03:27:53.780
rights and what they need and I haven't heard anything about that yet and I'm very, very

03:27:53.780 --> 03:27:56.139
worried.

03:27:56.139 --> 03:28:02.340
Please God don't let them walk away because I do not want to lose 9-1-1 and I came up

03:28:02.340 --> 03:28:05.979
here and I said that last week and I said it while I was crying so you may not have

03:28:05.979 --> 03:28:15.139
I've heard that, but there it is. As far as the ruckus that was caused, sir, the ruckus

03:28:15.139 --> 03:28:21.739
was not caused by just people going out and going, I'm going to cause some chaos. People

03:28:21.739 --> 03:28:27.059
came and were scared and they came to the meeting that Joshua had and they were still

03:28:27.059 --> 03:28:33.180
scared and they were hoping that somebody, that Gabby was going to be there, but Gabby

03:28:33.180 --> 03:28:38.780
and I didn't come that night and so people were very, very scared and yes, they spoke

03:28:38.780 --> 03:28:44.459
to the news because they did not have you there or they did not have Gabby there to

03:28:44.459 --> 03:28:53.459
answer the questions they had. So the ruckus really wasn't a ruckus, it was a cry, please

03:28:53.459 --> 03:29:01.360
help us before we're homeless because it's going to be winter when they end up homeless

03:29:01.360 --> 03:29:05.559
and that's not a good time to have babies in the snow, okay?

03:29:05.559 --> 03:29:08.659
You said you had kids, totally get it.

03:29:08.659 --> 03:29:10.739
It's not a good time to have babies in the snow

03:29:10.739 --> 03:29:12.180
and I'm not gonna start crying again

03:29:12.180 --> 03:29:14.200
even though I look like I am.

03:29:14.200 --> 03:29:19.200
So please, take the ruckus for what it is and take...

03:29:19.200 --> 03:29:48.000
and the 60 days, that's a good idea. It gives them two paychecks. 120 days is kind of long. I know that's Chicago as far as giving, you know, 60 days to let them leave. 30 days is kind of short. It's only one paycheck. 60 days is two paychecks. 120 days, yeah, that's long. And the 60 days, that's a good idea. It gives them two

03:29:48.000 --> 03:29:50.280
So I'm just asking for leniency.

03:29:50.280 --> 03:29:54.040
I know I'm coming up on my three minutes and so mask on.

03:29:54.040 --> 03:30:10.100
Thank you very much for letting me speak and thank you.

03:30:10.100 --> 03:30:15.100
Before I pray, I just wanna say 120 days

03:30:18.620 --> 03:30:23.620
is really not that long when you've been renting

03:30:23.620 --> 03:30:27.639
10, nine, 10 and 12 years.

03:30:27.639 --> 03:30:31.040
and some of these renters have been there that long.

03:30:32.760 --> 03:30:34.920
Father God, in the name of Jesus,

03:30:35.920 --> 03:30:39.959
I come to you as only I know how,

03:30:39.959 --> 03:30:43.680
seeking your face for direction and understanding, Father.

03:30:45.020 --> 03:30:46.520
For this is your city.

03:30:47.520 --> 03:30:52.520
It carries the title, the name, Free Port, for a reason.

03:30:55.459 --> 03:30:59.360
I need you to move, O God, on the behalf of your people.

03:30:59.399 --> 03:31:05.870
The ones that have minds made up without even considering what's really at hand

03:31:07.110 --> 03:31:09.110
Speak to the heart. Oh God

03:31:11.440 --> 03:31:14.600
May we look to the hills from with cometh our help

03:31:15.959 --> 03:31:18.040
For our help cometh from you I

03:31:20.329 --> 03:31:25.770
Bind up the isms and schisms and the hands of the devil they would think

03:31:26.610 --> 03:31:29.770
It was going to run a scheme through our city

03:31:30.409 --> 03:31:39.420
You take control

03:31:39.420 --> 03:31:49.799
you give us what we need to be successful we trust you in advance we praise you in

03:31:49.799 --> 03:32:01.420
advance we give you all glory honor for you alone are worthy and we say victory

03:32:01.420 --> 03:32:16.520
is ours in the name of Jesus we will not lay down and die in Jesus name amen that

03:32:16.520 --> 03:32:19.559
will conclude public comments I'll entertain a motion for adjournment

03:32:19.559 --> 03:32:37.079
Sommel. Second. Motion made by Sellers, seconded by Shadle. Madam Clerk, please take the roll. Shadle. Aye. Sanders. Aye. Sellers. Aye. Klemm. Aye. Johnson. Aye. Simmons. Parker. Aye. Stacy. Aye. Motion passes.

